[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Bitcoin - kurtster - Oct 16, 2021 - 10:47pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - Oct 16, 2021 - 10:26pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 16, 2021 - 8:57pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Oct 16, 2021 - 7:52pm
 
True Confessions - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2021 - 4:49pm
 
Outstanding Covers - Ohmsen - Oct 16, 2021 - 4:44pm
 
And the good news is.... - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2021 - 4:27pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - haresfur - Oct 16, 2021 - 3:54pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Oct 16, 2021 - 3:10pm
 
songs that ROCK! - Ohmsen - Oct 16, 2021 - 2:30pm
 
More reggae, less Marley please - Ohmsen - Oct 16, 2021 - 2:04pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2021 - 1:28pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2021 - 1:08pm
 
Oregon - politics - westslope - Oct 16, 2021 - 9:24am
 
That's good advice - oldviolin - Oct 16, 2021 - 8:00am
 
COVID-19 - miamizsun - Oct 16, 2021 - 7:55am
 
How To Be Politically Correct, A Primer - miamizsun - Oct 16, 2021 - 7:49am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Oct 16, 2021 - 7:03am
 
Regarding dogs - Antigone - Oct 16, 2021 - 5:20am
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Oct 15, 2021 - 9:16pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 15, 2021 - 8:26pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Oct 15, 2021 - 7:56pm
 
Best.Idea.Ever. - Red_Dragon - Oct 15, 2021 - 7:37pm
 
Apps turning itself on at night!night! - jarro - Oct 15, 2021 - 6:16pm
 
Joe Biden - R_P - Oct 15, 2021 - 4:32pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - olivertwist - Oct 15, 2021 - 4:03pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Antigone - Oct 15, 2021 - 3:37pm
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - miamizsun - Oct 15, 2021 - 2:36pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 15, 2021 - 1:00pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Oct 15, 2021 - 12:30pm
 
Britain - davidrsim - Oct 15, 2021 - 12:12pm
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Oct 15, 2021 - 12:09pm
 
Get the Quote - primm - Oct 15, 2021 - 11:48am
 
Oh GOD, they're GAY! - miamizsun - Oct 15, 2021 - 8:21am
 
Democratic Party - westslope - Oct 15, 2021 - 8:03am
 
Have you planned your Halloween costume yet?? - sirdroseph - Oct 15, 2021 - 7:24am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Oct 15, 2021 - 6:48am
 
Rolling Stones - sirdroseph - Oct 15, 2021 - 3:18am
 
BillyGee's Greatest Segues - ScottN - Oct 14, 2021 - 8:31pm
 
Name My Band - Manbird - Oct 14, 2021 - 5:26pm
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - islander - Oct 14, 2021 - 4:17pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Oct 14, 2021 - 1:59pm
 
Health Care - Red_Dragon - Oct 14, 2021 - 9:03am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - Ohmsen - Oct 14, 2021 - 8:03am
 
NORGE (Norway) - Ohmsen - Oct 14, 2021 - 6:39am
 
Economix - Ohmsen - Oct 14, 2021 - 6:12am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Oct 14, 2021 - 6:10am
 
Unresearched Conspiracy Theories - Ohmsen - Oct 14, 2021 - 6:01am
 
Unquiet Minds - Mental Health Forum - miamizsun - Oct 14, 2021 - 4:45am
 
Terrorist Watch! - Red_Dragon - Oct 14, 2021 - 4:37am
 
Africa!! - sirdroseph - Oct 14, 2021 - 4:30am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Oct 13, 2021 - 9:25pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - whatshisname - Oct 13, 2021 - 6:55pm
 
Alexa won't play RP except on Tune-in - jarro - Oct 13, 2021 - 12:47pm
 
Shuttle, ISS and other Real Space Ships - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 13, 2021 - 11:19am
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - black321 - Oct 13, 2021 - 11:16am
 
TV shows you watch - marko86 - Oct 13, 2021 - 9:08am
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - Jiggz - Oct 13, 2021 - 8:22am
 
THREE WORDS - Ohmsen - Oct 12, 2021 - 10:56pm
 
Immigration - Ohmsen - Oct 12, 2021 - 10:42pm
 
possible to ban an artist from my streams ? - oldviolin - Oct 12, 2021 - 8:11pm
 
Free Stuff & Swap - oldviolin - Oct 12, 2021 - 8:10pm
 
• • • Clownstock • • •  - Manbird - Oct 12, 2021 - 7:52pm
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Oct 12, 2021 - 4:19pm
 
Canada - westslope - Oct 12, 2021 - 3:59pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Oct 12, 2021 - 11:52am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Steely_D - Oct 12, 2021 - 11:13am
 
Race in America - black321 - Oct 12, 2021 - 10:03am
 
The War On You - Ohmsen - Oct 12, 2021 - 9:41am
 
Jazz - black321 - Oct 12, 2021 - 9:26am
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - miamizsun - Oct 12, 2021 - 4:09am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Oct 11, 2021 - 7:54pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - Antigone - Oct 11, 2021 - 2:48pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Oct 11, 2021 - 2:19pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - oldviolin - Oct 11, 2021 - 2:14pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » The War On You Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 74, 75, 76
Post to this Topic
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:48am

 kurtster wrote:
miamizsun wrote:
'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans

A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the  September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. 



Thought it worthy of reposting here ...

Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention.

Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things.

Peace



 
I am extremely disappointed in this memo. The good part is that it is being exposed. I'm really glad that someone (Michael Issakoff) has taken this on. It's about time we shined a light on this.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 5, 2013 - 6:42am

miamizsun wrote:
'Due process' is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

EXCLUSIVE: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans

A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the  September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes. 



Thought it worthy of reposting here ...

Just another dot in the minds of those who are paying attention.

Sadly, just part of someone else's paranoia in the minds of those who chose to believe in other things.

Peace




hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 11, 2013 - 6:46am

 miamizsun wrote:
is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge)

U.S. Cities Relying on Precog Software to Predict Murder

 

Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you?

New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision.

The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia.

Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.



 
How often does science fiction become fiction?

As long as they don't use the wooden balls, so stupid. 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2013 - 6:44am

is it me or does this seem very scary? (i mean the potential for abuse is huge)

U.S. Cities Relying on Precog Software to Predict Murder

 

Who needs the freaky precogs of Minority Report to predict if someone’s likely to commit murder when you have an algorithm that can do it for you?

New crime-prediction software used in Maryland and Pennsylvania, and soon to be rolled out in the nation’s capital too, promises to reduce the homicide rate by predicting which prison parolees are likely to commit murder and therefore receive more stringent supervision.

The software aims to replace the judgments parole officers already make based on a parolee’s criminal record and is currently being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia.

Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania who developed the algorithm, claims it will reduce the murder rate and other crimes and could help courts set bail amounts as well as sentencing in the future.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 6:06am

 Zep wrote:
Renditions continue under Obama.

The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators.

U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.

. . . . . .

But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? 
 



 
Obama ? 

Isn't he the guy that hunts down American citizens, ignoring the Constitution and due process and kills them with drones ?
Zep

Zep Avatar



Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:52am

Renditions continue under Obama.

The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators.

U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial.

. . . . . .

But they were suspected terrorists, so that makes it all good, right? Right? Am I right? Right? (is this thing on? tap-tap-tap) RIGHT, everyone, this is ok? 
 


bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:32am

 kurtster wrote:
 Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.   I am just aware.   A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.   What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.   Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.

EdIt:  If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.

 
We live in a country where our choices for President  were Mitt Romney(who I do not care for) or re-elect a child murderer.

Our country picked the child murderer.

 That is when I realized my life is basically over.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:27am

 helenofjoy wrote:

The anger that comes across in many of your posts.  Not just this conversation.  To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.

 

I took your comment, which was obviously directed at me, as a direct charge that I was living a life filled with fear which directly affects all of my thinking and limits my ability to reason properly.  Now that is constructive ?  I think that is more of an attack to be used to dismiss all of my thinking regardless of merit.

Calling something worn out is tantamount to a personal attack now ?

As you wish ...


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:19am

 kurtster wrote:


My reply to you was filled with vitriol ?
 ( Not this particular reply, no. )

and what anger ?

{#Ask}

 
The anger that comes across in many of your posts.  Not just this conversation.  To call my comment a worn out cliche wasn't exactly constructive.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 5:04am

 helenofjoy wrote:

Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are.  It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche.  Your fear is obvious in your anger.  If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol.  You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone.  If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.

 

My reply to you was filled with vitriol ?

and what anger ?

{#Ask}


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:58am

 kurtster wrote:

That cliché is so worn out.  I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.

What is the first step in problem solving ?  Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.  I am just aware.  A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.  What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.  Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.
 
Defining the problem doesn't seem to be so difficult - most of us are very aware of what the problems are.  It is only your opinion that my statement is a worn out cliche.  Your fear is obvious in your anger.  If you were not afraid, you would be able to express your thinking without all the insulting vitriol.  You would be able to discuss your ideas in a reasonable, respectful tone.  If you really expect to get people to "see" what it is you see, you may have to change your approach.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:49am

 helenofjoy wrote:
I think it must be horrible to live a life every day filled with fear-based, negative thinking.  It leaves no room for creative, positive problem solving.  

 
That cliché is so worn out.  I could flip it around and say that is the charge against those who think that Global Warming is the greatest danger facing our planet and worth sacrificing everything in order to combat it.

What is the first step in problem solving ?  Admitting that there is a problem and then defining the problem.

Please make no mistake, at least about me, that I am not afraid.  I am just aware.  A huge difference.

I'll grant you one thing however.  What is scary is that too many are afraid to consider or discuss that things are going wrong or might be going wrong.  Not talking about it is the worst way to go about solving 'the problem'.

EdIt:  If you don't think it is a problem, then never mind.
helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:34am

I think it must be horrible to live a life every day filled with fear-based, negative thinking.  It leaves no room for creative, positive problem solving.  
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 2, 2013 - 4:07am

 ScottN wrote:
kurtster wrote:


I saw this last night.  It is now evident that the 'mental health system' in place was being used as designed. 

I had a waiting room conversation yesterday with a 75 yo gentleman who was retired military and federal worker while waiting for my wife who was having an epidural for her back.

We talked at length about his experience as a federal worker.  What I took away was his point that all, and the emphasis is on all, federal programs are designed with the perfect scenario as the design model for programs.  They are not designed with flexibilty and unseen or unanticipated variables in mind.  That is their inherent design flaw.  That is the fatal flaw in most all government designed one size fits all programs that come with a plethora of unanticipated consequences.

Perhaps this notion will become evident as how the process involved in the shooter's proposed institutionalization is disected in the coming months.



Kurt, the  world, especially the USA under the admin. of BO, is apparently dystopian to you.  I wish you well.

 
A more appropriate place for this reply ...

And a HNY to you to !

Since you wish to dig up my non partisan remark and make it partisan, I'll grant your wish and continue.

I'll keep it simple and somewhat recent for you.  The turning point for me in my feelings was with Bush and the passage of the Patriot Act.  Its been conclusively downhill ever since. 

What really upset me about the Patriot Act (PA)  was when shortly after its passing, a couple came into the store I was working at the time who were European immigrants and most likely Holocaust survivors based upon the conversation I had with them.,  I don't quite remember how the convo started but obviously 9/11 and the PA were fresh in everyone's minds and still much discussed in public.  They expressed approval of the PA saying that 'we' needed it in order to make America a much safer place.  I countered that it took away too many rights and liberties in the process and they simply replied that it was worth it.  I was floored that people such as these, people who had endured all the worst of what WW II was about and they did not see or care about the rights of Americans in light of 'increased security'.  It immediately made me think about the widely circulated Franklin quote :

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"
.Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759.

That is one of the biggest lessons of Germany and WW II.  How someone like these two would ignore the parallels of the past and approve of something like the PA really pissed me off.  After throwing back the Franklin quote and receiving blank stares, I just dropped the subject.  But it sharply illustrated the willingness of some and as it turns out 10 years later, the folly and willingnes of so many to ignore the wisdom of Franklin and roll over and gladly accept whatever comes down the hill from DC in the guise of increased safety, regardless of the costs involved. 

During the campaign of 2008, when everyone was saying that McCain would be Bush 3, I kept countering that Obama would be Bush 3 on steroids.  I have stated many times here, that Bush 43 was the most socialist POTUS since FDR.  That was true until recently.  We have a new winner of that award now.

I'll take my dystopian views over your Pollyannish utopian take of our current events, anyday.  I won't be surprised at how things work out.  You are in for a big shock somewhere down the road I'll wager.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 28, 2012 - 5:33am

as the force and aggression of political leadership progresses, it becomes more difficult to to shield or hide...

it's all one giant continuous war against you...

Senate Rejects FISA Reforms, Delays Vote On Bush-Era Warrantless Wiretapping Program



The Senate rejected three attempts Thursday to add oversight and privacy safeguards to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) amendments that authorize the warrantless wiretapping program begun under President George W. Bush, but delayed a final vote on the measure until Friday.

The program, which the Bush administration started without congressional authorization shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, collects intelligence on Americans who are communicating abroad with foreign "targets" designated by spy agencies like the CIA and National Security Agency. Critics, including NSA whistle-blowers, have raised fears that law-abiding Americans' communications are getting caught up in a vast, electronic dragnet of phone calls and emails.




Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 74, 75, 76