[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

We need some new car names - Manbird - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:12pm
 
Surfing! - Ohmsen - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:11pm
 
Things You Thought Today - islander - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:10pm
 
Trump - islander - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:57pm
 
Internet Addict?? - islander - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:52pm
 
Name My Band - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:17pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - R_P - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:16pm
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:14pm
 
FOUR WORDS - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:11pm
 
THREE WORDS - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:09pm
 
TWO WORDS - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:09pm
 
ONE WORD - SeriousLee - Jan 19, 2020 - 1:08pm
 
Impeachment Time: - buddy - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:37pm
 
Economix - R_P - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:25pm
 
2020 Elections - buddy - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:23pm
 
Music News - buddy - Jan 19, 2020 - 12:09pm
 
Fix My Car - westslope - Jan 19, 2020 - 11:46am
 
Tartaria And The Mud Floods - buzz - Jan 19, 2020 - 11:02am
 
Movie Recommendation - islander - Jan 19, 2020 - 10:39am
 
What Did You See Today? - kcar - Jan 19, 2020 - 10:10am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - agmonaco1 - Jan 19, 2020 - 9:10am
 
RP and Sonos - stefcolonna - Jan 19, 2020 - 9:01am
 
Aliens, Aliens! - success - Jan 19, 2020 - 3:52am
 
Climate Change - success - Jan 19, 2020 - 2:13am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Jan 18, 2020 - 8:57pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - KarmaKarma - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:40pm
 
Democratic Party - KarmaKarma - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:29pm
 
war is a racket - westslope - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:29pm
 
DIY - Red_Dragon - Jan 18, 2020 - 2:26pm
 
Palestine - R_P - Jan 18, 2020 - 11:48am
 
Baseball, anyone? - SeriousLee - Jan 18, 2020 - 11:40am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - R_P - Jan 18, 2020 - 11:28am
 
Vinyl vs CD - SeriousLee - Jan 18, 2020 - 10:40am
 
Documentaries - sirdroseph - Jan 18, 2020 - 9:17am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Coaxial - Jan 18, 2020 - 9:14am
 
Automotive Lust - islander - Jan 18, 2020 - 7:20am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - Red_Dragon - Jan 18, 2020 - 7:11am
 
Republican Wingnut Freak of the Day - Red_Dragon - Jan 18, 2020 - 6:28am
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - islander - Jan 18, 2020 - 6:18am
 
UK stream - mike_barr - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:51am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Jan 18, 2020 - 4:42am
 
Canada - R_P - Jan 17, 2020 - 10:39pm
 
Stream stopping at promo - lannydevaney - Jan 17, 2020 - 7:51pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jan 17, 2020 - 7:41pm
 
R&R Hall of Fame Show - buddy - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:53pm
 
What the hell OV? - buddy - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:51pm
 
how do you feel right now? - SeriousLee - Jan 17, 2020 - 12:43pm
 
Mellow stream - jarro - Jan 17, 2020 - 11:45am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - Red_Dragon - Jan 17, 2020 - 10:22am
 
The war on funk is over! - rhahl - Jan 17, 2020 - 8:25am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Jan 17, 2020 - 5:30am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jan 17, 2020 - 4:40am
 
What makes you smile? - Coaxial - Jan 16, 2020 - 6:14pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Jan 16, 2020 - 2:21pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Jan 16, 2020 - 11:39am
 
Regarding cats - Proclivities - Jan 16, 2020 - 11:11am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Jan 16, 2020 - 6:07am
 
Music Videos - sirdroseph - Jan 16, 2020 - 4:24am
 
I'm a Dem. Which Republican would you recommend I vote for? - jahgirl8 - Jan 15, 2020 - 8:36pm
 
Stuff I like - Antigone - Jan 15, 2020 - 5:07pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - triskele - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:43pm
 
Private messages in a public forum - jahgirl8 - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:19pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - Antigone - Jan 15, 2020 - 2:57pm
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - piratesbaseball44 - Jan 15, 2020 - 1:23pm
 
Books - R_P - Jan 15, 2020 - 1:03pm
 
Breaking News - buddy - Jan 15, 2020 - 8:34am
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - Red_Dragon - Jan 15, 2020 - 7:34am
 
Drinking Establishments - Coaxial - Jan 15, 2020 - 7:00am
 
LOVIN The ONION - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 15, 2020 - 6:59am
 
Star wars with a twist - sirdroseph - Jan 15, 2020 - 4:17am
 
Iran - R_P - Jan 14, 2020 - 8:08pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 14, 2020 - 3:01pm
 
Photography Chat - haresfur - Jan 14, 2020 - 2:50pm
 
Internet Speed Test - miamizsun - Jan 14, 2020 - 11:33am
 
audio codec - BillG - Jan 14, 2020 - 10:33am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » The War on Happiness Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22
Post to this Topic
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 12:05pm

The happiness obtained from defeating an opponent is rather shallow and fleeting.  I prefer more profound pleasures.




hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 11:51am

 kurtster wrote:

Preventing winning is a denial of happiness.  The denial of happiness because its not fair to someone else who doesn't have the same set of skills in a given sport or activity.  Somehow, you tried to inject violent competion as an excuse for injecting 'fairness' or 'non-winning' into all activities.  Not all sports and activities consist of violent competition.  Yet you try to use it as an excuse to stop or end true competition of any kind.

 


Also saying that denial of winning is denial of happiness is a personal projection, not a statement of truth.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 11:49am

 kurtster wrote:

Preventing winning is a denial of happiness.  The denial of happiness because its not fair to someone else who doesn't have the same set of skills in a given sport or activity.  Somehow, you tried to inject violent competion as an excuse for injecting 'fairness' or 'non-winning' into all activities.  Not all sports and activities consist of violent competition.  Yet you try to use it as an excuse to stop or end true competition of any kind.

 


You are putting words in my mouth, I play scrabble as competitively as possible. But cooperation, not competition is the 21st century way. We are a global nation, and we are going to have to learn to help each other. Tribalism and fighting (which physical competition prepares us for) is passe.
btw happiness comes from within, no one can take that from you.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 11:35am

 hippiechick wrote:

You are the one who started the thread, you should at least make a case tor what you believe.

 
Preventing winning is a denial of happiness.  The denial of happiness because its not fair to someone else who doesn't have the same set of skills in a given sport or activity.  Somehow, you tried to inject violent competion as an excuse for injecting 'fairness' or 'non-winning' into all activities.  Not all sports and activities consist of violent competition.  Yet you try to use it as an excuse to stop or end true competition of any kind.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 11:00am

 kurtster wrote:


Political correctness is indeed a major factor in this discussion.

Let your questions simmer for a while. Aflannigan asked a great question, already.  This isn't about me or what I think. 

There are many others around.  This is the most 'us' question of all, IMHO.

 


You are the one who started the thread, you should at least make a case tor what you believe.
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 10:59am

 kurtster wrote:

There is a war on Happiness. 

 

Manufactured outrage courtesy of Fox News.  I caught the segment on O'Reilly where Greg Gutfeld put out his "war on fun stuff" theory, presumably taken from his book.

Everyone knows that the classic definition of a Puritan is someone who has a sneaking suspicion that someone, somewhere, is having fun.  O'Reilly and his fellow Fox pundits basically come from the same Puritan mold.  What Gutfeld is trying to do is invert this old joke to define liberals as Puritans.

It ain't gonna wash, not with folks like O'Reilly and Limbaugh slut-shaming unmarried women who dare to want to have sex.  Remember the Scarlet Letter?  Limbaugh, O'Reilly and others who go after Sandra Fluke are simply carrying on a cherished Puritan tradition.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 10:26am

 hippiechick wrote:

Why do your think that "non -winning" is misery?

 

Political correctness is indeed a major factor in this discussion.

Let your questions simmer for a while. Aflannigan asked a great question, already.  This isn't about me or what I think. 

There are many others around.  This is the most 'us' question of all, IMHO.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 10:14am

 kurtster wrote:

Just take the bolded part and go from there.

Consider my narrow view as a beginning towards the widening of the conversation.

The uneven pursuit of happiness versus the equal sharing of misery. 

As a reason for founding a country and how current events are directly opposed to the notion.



 


Why do your think that "non -winning" is misery?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 10:14am

 buddy wrote:
Much as I see your good intentions, I fear this topic will come to no good end. Some folks don't understand that an "argument" doesn't have to be a negative thing. Best of luck - I give it 2 days ;)

 
Thanks.

Two days around here is pretty good.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 10:06am

 sirdroseph wrote:

Socialism exists as an idea because a lot of people simply reject the idea that in a modern world so many people especially children should go hungry as the millionaire movie stars and athletes you speak of lament on the taxes they have to pay on their Lamborghini's or opulent palaces in gated communities (or injustices of a Czars lifestyle vs. a peasant). You are entering an enormous philosophical discussion from a rather narrow viewpoint skewed suspiciously towards a somewhat different subject imo than the pursuit of happiness and its general importance to the founding fathers.

 
Just take the bolded part and go from there.

Consider my narrow view as a beginning towards the widening of the conversation.

The uneven pursuit of happiness versus the equal sharing of misery. 

As a reason for founding a country and how current events are directly opposed to the notion.


aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 10:04am

 kurtster wrote:
Another example can be infered by the playing of games in public grade schools where no one is allowed to win.  

The idea that there are no winners and losers in public schools is truly laughable.  What do you think grades are?  What do you think high stakes test scores are for?  They are for ranking and sorting children into winners and losers.
buddy

buddy Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 10:02am

Much as I see your good intentions, I fear this topic will come to no good end. Some folks don't understand that an "argument" doesn't have to be a negative thing. Best of luck - I give it 2 days ;)
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 9:57am

And besides, the exact opposite is happening, so what you say isn't even up for discussion.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 9:55am

 kurtster wrote:

I've put out enough already to begin a conversation.  There is lot's of room for an interesting non partisan discussion on this topic.

The idea of Happiness is so profound that it was used as a reason to start a whole new country and reinforce the idea as a worthy ideal.

Apply it to my public school example and tell me how playing to a deliberate tie is good and consistent with the pursuit of Happiness and not contrary to the ideal of the equal sharing of misery.

 


Because non -competitive cooperation is healthier and more relevant than violent competition in the 21st century?
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 9:47am

 kurtster wrote:

I've put out enough already to begin a conversation.  There is lot's of room for an interesting non partisan discussion on this topic.

The idea of Happiness is so profound that it was used as a reason to start a whole new country and reinforce the idea as a worthy ideal.

Apply it to my public school example and tell me how playing to a deliberate tie is good and consistent with the pursuit of Happiness and not contrary to the ideal of the equal sharing of misery.

 
Socialism exists as an idea because a lot of people simply reject the idea that in a modern world so many people especially children should go hungry as the millionaire movie stars and athletes you speak of lament on the taxes they have to pay on their Lamborghini's or opulent palaces in gated communities (or injustices of a Czars lifestyle vs. a peasant). You are entering an enormous philosophical discussion from a rather narrow viewpoint skewed suspiciously towards a somewhat different subject imo than the pursuit of happiness and its general importance to the founding fathers.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 9:34am

 hippiechick wrote:

Why do you think that this is a bad thing?

 
I've put out enough already to begin a conversation.  There is lot's of room for an interesting non partisan discussion on this topic.

The idea of Happiness is so profound that it was used as a reason to start a whole new country and reinforce the idea as a worthy ideal.

Apply it to my public school example and tell me how playing to a deliberate tie is good and consistent with the pursuit of Happiness and not contrary to the ideal of the equal sharing of misery.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 9:16am

 kurtster wrote:

We'll see.

Another example can be infered by the playing of games in public grade schools where no one is allowed to win.  The teams play to a tie so there are no winners and losers.  No hurt feelings of losing are allowed.  Conversely, no happiness in winning is allowed.

I think this really cuts through all the bs and strips it down to the bare bones.  This is the core.  Its about the social paradigm shift were are in the middle of or end of depending on your persuasion.

 
Why do you think that this is a bad thing?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 9:14am

 MsJudi wrote:

Oh for goodness sakes. {#Rolleyes} {#Doh}

 
We'll see.

Another example can be infered by the playing of games in public grade schools where no one is allowed to win.  The teams play to a tie so there are no winners and losers.  No hurt feelings of losing are allowed.  Conversely, no happiness in winning is allowed.

I think this really cuts through all the bs and strips it down to the bare bones.  This is the core.  Its about the social paradigm shift were are in the middle of or end of depending on your persuasion.
MsJudi

MsJudi Avatar

Location: Houston, TX
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 8:56am

 kurtster wrote:

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Sir Winston Churchill.

The Founders of this great country were aware of many things.  The concept of Happiness was so important that it was given star billing in the Declaration Of Independence … the pursuit of Happiness.

Class warfare is an attack on happiness when considered in Churchill’s remarks.  The same can be said of secular attacks on religious events.

How is it that we idolize millionaire movie stars, canonize millionaire rock stars and worship millionaire athletes, yet demonize millionaire entrepreneurs and businessmen ?

There is a war on Happiness.  The fact that the smallest of voices can now attack and silence the joy or celebration of the many by claiming their rights are being trampled is absurd, for openers.



 
Oh for goodness sakes. {#Rolleyes} {#Doh}
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 9, 2012 - 8:47am

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Sir Winston Churchill.

The Founders of this great country were aware of many things.  The concept of Happiness was so important that it was given star billing in the Declaration Of Independence … the pursuit of Happiness.

Class warfare is an attack on happiness when considered in Churchill’s remarks.  The same can be said of secular attacks on religious events.

How is it that we idolize millionaire movie stars, canonize millionaire rock stars and worship millionaire athletes, yet demonize millionaire entrepreneurs and businessmen ?

There is a war on Happiness.  The fact that the smallest of voices can now attack and silence the joy or celebration of the many by claiming their rights are being trampled is absurd, for openers.




Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22