[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - islander - Oct 13, 2019 - 5:48pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Coaxial - Oct 13, 2019 - 2:34pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - katzendogs - Oct 13, 2019 - 1:46pm
 
We are all hostages of 9/11 - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 1:14pm
 
Syria - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 12:53pm
 
Name My Band - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 10:25am
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Oct 13, 2019 - 9:43am
 
Trump - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 9:18am
 
Thanks RP! - Ohmsen - Oct 13, 2019 - 9:11am
 
Remembering the Good Old Days - FourFortyEight - Oct 13, 2019 - 8:25am
 
What did you have for dinner? - Antigone - Oct 13, 2019 - 8:24am
 
Baseball, anyone? - SeriousLee - Oct 13, 2019 - 7:25am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - SeriousLee - Oct 13, 2019 - 7:18am
 
What are you listening to now? - SeriousLee - Oct 13, 2019 - 7:13am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Oct 13, 2019 - 7:09am
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Oct 12, 2019 - 4:28pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - haresfur - Oct 12, 2019 - 1:40pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Oct 12, 2019 - 12:42pm
 
Living in America - Lazy8 - Oct 12, 2019 - 12:19pm
 
Today in History - oldviolin - Oct 12, 2019 - 11:00am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Oct 12, 2019 - 10:44am
 
Eclectic mix not working - BillG - Oct 12, 2019 - 9:22am
 
Celebrity Deaths - miamizsun - Oct 12, 2019 - 7:07am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - haresfur - Oct 12, 2019 - 2:18am
 
RP is not available Echo - WestMidsMatt - Oct 12, 2019 - 1:57am
 
Roku Update Wishlist - BillG - Oct 11, 2019 - 7:36pm
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - buddy - Oct 11, 2019 - 6:41pm
 
Which Five Guests? - buddy - Oct 11, 2019 - 6:37pm
 
Top Lists - R_P - Oct 11, 2019 - 4:02pm
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Oct 11, 2019 - 1:11pm
 
Climate Change - miamizsun - Oct 11, 2019 - 12:11pm
 
Canada - westslope - Oct 11, 2019 - 8:28am
 
King Crimson - westslope - Oct 11, 2019 - 8:21am
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Isabeau - Oct 11, 2019 - 6:49am
 
Outstanding Covers - rhahl - Oct 10, 2019 - 6:22pm
 
5 words for Barack Obama - miamizsun - Oct 10, 2019 - 4:13pm
 
Tech & Science - miamizsun - Oct 10, 2019 - 4:06pm
 
Suggestion: Americana Mix - davekrug - Oct 10, 2019 - 3:20pm
 
New Music - R_P - Oct 10, 2019 - 3:16pm
 
• • • Clownstock • • •  - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 1:47pm
 
Advertising Gone Mad - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 1:44pm
 
Old Time and Folk - miamizsun - Oct 10, 2019 - 1:13pm
 
HALF A WORD - miamizsun - Oct 10, 2019 - 1:04pm
 
Mexico - R_P - Oct 10, 2019 - 12:52pm
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 11:54am
 
HomeKit HomePod AppleTV - BillG - Oct 10, 2019 - 11:49am
 
Trump Lies - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 11:48am
 
HALF A WORLD - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 10:46am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 10, 2019 - 8:38am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - sirdroseph - Oct 10, 2019 - 7:14am
 
Party planning advice - Proclivities - Oct 10, 2019 - 6:53am
 
FLAC stream - black321 - Oct 10, 2019 - 6:07am
 
Cuban, Venezuelan, DR music - miamizsun - Oct 10, 2019 - 5:18am
 
Interview: Samuel L. Jackson - Egctheow - Oct 10, 2019 - 1:29am
 
Best Radio Station in the World - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 9, 2019 - 5:07pm
 
Radiohead - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 9, 2019 - 4:42pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Oct 9, 2019 - 2:18pm
 
Ecuador - R_P - Oct 9, 2019 - 2:00pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - miamizsun - Oct 9, 2019 - 1:46pm
 
Gay Marriage v. Civil Unions: an Intelligent Discussion - Lazy8 - Oct 9, 2019 - 10:37am
 
Weird sounds - Proclivities - Oct 9, 2019 - 10:21am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Oct 9, 2019 - 9:35am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - westslope - Oct 9, 2019 - 9:33am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - sirdroseph - Oct 9, 2019 - 6:21am
 
Economix - miamizsun - Oct 9, 2019 - 4:50am
 
Questions. - Ohmsen - Oct 9, 2019 - 4:02am
 
Art Show - oldviolin - Oct 8, 2019 - 10:14pm
 
Dark Theme - haresfur - Oct 8, 2019 - 10:06pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Oct 8, 2019 - 5:17pm
 
Reviews and Pix from your concerts and shows you couldn't... - Steely_D - Oct 8, 2019 - 3:09pm
 
Fix My Car - westslope - Oct 8, 2019 - 1:04pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Oct 8, 2019 - 10:59am
 
how do you feel right now? - PoundPuppy - Oct 8, 2019 - 10:34am
 
How's the weather? - Proclivities - Oct 8, 2019 - 10:26am
 
What Did You Do Today? - Isabeau - Oct 8, 2019 - 9:44am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Business as Usual Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Post to this Topic
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 11:50am

 RichardPrins wrote:

There are other meanings of fyt. {#Mrgreen}

 

Flaming Youth Tutorial?
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 11:35am

 RichardPrins wrote:

There are other meanings of fyt. {#Mrgreen}

 
Fine Young Tannables. I loved that band.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 9:17am

 Proclivities wrote:

I thought you would've written "CYFC"  (changed your font color)

 
You're right, but I was doing it on the cheap.

Aye, we all get what we pay for  ... {#Wink}
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 9:09am

 kurtster wrote:

My bad.  Shouda used fyf ... fixed your font ...

but I made my point.  Carry on.

 
I thought you would've written "CYFC"  (changed your font color)
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 8:27am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

fyt: Fixed Your Typo. I got that you were attacking the messenger by making the type green, but fyt (to me) means you've creatively edited the post to add some wry humor. I couldn't find any edits. That is all.

 
My bad.  Shouda used fyf ... fixed your font ...

but I made my point.  Carry on.
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 7:27am

 RichardPrins wrote:

There are other meanings of fyt. {#Mrgreen}

 
...as well. Also.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 7:25am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:
fyt: Fixed Your Typo. I got that you were attacking the messenger by making the type green, but fyt (to me) means you've creatively edited the post to add some wry humor. I couldn't find any edits. That is all.
 
There are other meanings of fyt. {#Mrgreen}
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 7:21am

 kurtster wrote:

Just my opinion.  Was it offensive to you ?

 
fyt: Fixed Your Typo. I got that you were attacking the messenger by making the type green, but fyt (to me) means you've creatively edited the post to add some wry humor. I couldn't find any edits. That is all.


aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 19, 2014 - 7:00am

Somebody apparently doesn't understand the concept of Content Curation.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2014 - 6:22pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

wtf

 
Just my opinion.  Was it offensive to you ?

seems to be endless / relentless cutting and pasting with little or no comment, not unlike another who did much the same.  Maybe more diverse in subject matter and with respectful font, but endless.

and this thread seemed to present the opportunity to point out an irony.  Business as usual indeed.  Much of it pointless.

Maybe I should have responded with this, but it would be shot down as a rightwing political reaction, and then it could be interpreted as if I was defending the program in his post that he was illustrating.  Which would not be the case.

When all one does is cut and paste, it has to be assumed at some point the poster believes in and agrees with what they are pasting.  And that is because there is no accompanying comments, almost exclusively.  So I will put up my c / p response to his c / p.  But remember, I am not defending the program, I have to assume he is attacking, because he says nothing.




ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2014 - 9:29am

 kurtster wrote:


fyt

 
wtf
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 18, 2014 - 9:24am

 RichardPrins wrote:
(...)

The F-35, given the amount of money thrown at it, doubtless has some improvements over planes such as the F-15 and F-18. But at a price tag of at least $400 billion to purchase the F-35, and $1.45 trillion over the life of the program to operate and maintain them, it has simply become far too prohibitive for the United State to afford, especially in a climate of fiscal austerity.

 

fyt
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 18, 2014 - 9:07am

(...)

The F-35, given the amount of money thrown at it, doubtless has some improvements over planes such as the F-15 and F-18. But at a price tag of at least $400 billion to purchase the F-35, and $1.45 trillion over the life of the program to operate and maintain them, it has simply become far too prohibitive for the United State to afford, especially in a climate of fiscal austerity.

Based on its track record, it’s probably safe to say that the F-35 will soon be a decade behind schedule and $200 billion over budget, even as it’s increasingly rendered irrelevant by improvements in drone technologies. So why are we buying it? Simply because the program is too big to fail. The Air Force, Navy, and Marines are all counting on it. Meanwhile, Lockheed Martin has distributed its subcontractors across the USA, making it exceedingly difficult for Congress to cut the program without hurting jobs in virtually every Congressional district. Indeed, in an awesome display of chutzpah, you can go to the Lockheed Martin website to see how much your state is involved in building the F-35. Clicking on the “economic impact map,” I see that for the State of Pennsylvania, for example, the F-35 creates 759 jobs and an economic impact of nearly $51 million.

For the DoD, the F-35 may have ridden off the rails, but for Lockheed Martin the F-35 will continue to soar into the stratosphere as a major money-maker for decades to come. In the battle between DoD program managers and Lockheed Martin, the winner and “top gun” is as obvious as it is depressing. Score another victory for Lockheed Martin!  But please avert your eyes as America itself goes down in flames.


helenofjoy

helenofjoy Avatar

Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 7, 2014 - 5:28am

 RichardPrins wrote:
Rachel Aviv: The Scientist Who Took on a Leading Herbicide Manufacturer : The New Yorker

(...) Syngenta denied repeated requests for interviews, but Ann Bryan, its senior manager for external communications, told me in an e-mail that some of the studies I was citing were unreliable or unsound. When I mentioned a recent paper in the American Journal of Medical Genetics, which showed associations between a mother’s exposure to atrazine and the likelihood that her son will have an abnormally small penis, undescended testes, or a deformity of the urethra—defects that have increased in the past several decades—she said that the study had been “reviewed by independent scientists, who found numerous flaws.” She recommended that I speak with the author of the review, David Schwartz, a neuroscientist, who works for Innovative Science Solutions, a consulting firm that specializes in “product defense” and strategies that “give you the power to put your best data forward.” Schwartz told me that epidemiological studies can’t eliminate confounding variables or make claims about causation. “We’ve been incredibly misled by this type of study,” he said.

In 2012, in its settlement of the class-action suits, Syngenta agreed to pay a hundred and five million dollars to reimburse more than a thousand water systems for the cost of filtering atrazine from drinking water, but the company denies all wrongdoing. Bryan told me that “atrazine does not and, in fact, cannot cause adverse health effects at any level that people would ever be exposed to in the real-world environment.” She wrote that she was “troubled by a suggestion that we have ever tried to discredit anyone. Our focus has always been on communicating the science and setting the record straight.” She noted that “virtually every well-known brand, or even well-known issue, has a communications program behind it. Atrazine’s no different.”

Last August, Hayes put his experiments on hold. He said that his fees for animal care had risen eightfold in a decade, and that he couldn’t afford to maintain his research program. He accused the university of charging him more than other researchers in his department; in response, the director of the office of laboratory-animal care sent detailed charts illustrating that he is charged according to standard campus-wide rates, which have increased for most researchers in recent years. In an online Forbes op-ed, Jon Entine, a journalist who is listed in Syngenta’s records as a supportive “third party,” accused Hayes of being attached to conspiracy theories, and of leading the “international regulatory community on a wild goose chase,” which “borders on criminal.”

By late November, Hayes’s lab had resumed work. He was using private grants to support his students rather than to pay outstanding fees, and the lab was accumulating debt. Two days before Thanksgiving, Hayes and his students discussed their holiday plans. He was wearing an oversized orange sweatshirt, gym shorts, and running shoes, and a former student, Diana Salazar Guerrero, was eating fries that another student had left on the table. Hayes encouraged her to come to his Thanksgiving dinner and to move into the bedroom of his son, who is now a student at Oberlin. Guerrero had just put down half the deposit on a new apartment, but Hayes was disturbed by her description of her new roommate. “Are you sure you can trust him?” he asked.

Hayes had just returned from Mar del Plata, Argentina. He had flown fifteen hours and driven two hundred and fifty miles to give a thirty-minute lecture on atrazine. Guerrero said, “Sometimes I’m just, like, ‘Why don’t you let it go, Tyrone? It’s been fifteen years! How do you have the energy for this?’ ” With more scientists documenting the risks of atrazine, she assumed he’d be inclined to move on. “Originally, it was just this crazy guy at Berkeley, and you can throw the Berserkley thing at anyone,” she said. “But now the tide is turning.”

In a recent paper in the Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hayes and twenty-one other scientists applied the criteria of Sir Austin Bradford Hill, who, in 1965, outlined the conditions necessary for a causal relationship, to atrazine studies across different vertebrate classes. They argued that independent lines of evidence consistently showed that atrazine disrupts male reproductive development. Hayes’s lab was working on two more studies that explore how atrazine affects the sexual behavior of frogs. When I asked him what he would do if the E.P.A., which is conducting another review of the safety of atrazine this year, were to ban the herbicide, he joked, “I’d probably get depressed again.”

Not long ago, Hayes saw a description of himself on Wikipedia that he found disrespectful, and he wasn’t sure whether it was an attack by Syngenta or whether there were simply members of the public who thought poorly of him. He felt deflated when he remembered the arguments he’d had with Syngenta-funded pundits. “It’s one thing if you go after me because you have a philosophical disagreement with my science or if you think I’m raising alarm where there shouldn’t be any,” he said. “But they didn’t even have their own opinions. Someone was paying them to take a position.” He wondered if there was something inherently insane about the act of whistle-blowing; maybe only crazy people persisted. He was ready for a fight, but he seemed to be searching for his opponent.

One of his first graduate students, Nigel Noriega, who runs an organization devoted to conserving tropical forests, told me that he was still recovering from the experience of his atrazine research, a decade before. He had come to see science as a rigid culture, “its own club, an élite society,” Noriega said. “And Tyrone didn’t conform to the social aspects of being a scientist.” Noriega worried that the public had little understanding of the context that gives rise to scientific findings. “It is not helpful to anyone to assume that scientists are authoritative,” he said. “A good scientist spends his whole career questioning his own facts. One of the most dangerous things you can do is believe.”



 
I listened to this piece too and was appalled but not surprised.  Do we honestly thing anyone out to make the big bucks - the really big bucks -  gives a damn about truth?
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 7, 2014 - 12:09am

Rachel Aviv: The Scientist Who Took on a Leading Herbicide Manufacturer : The New Yorker

(...) Syngenta denied repeated requests for interviews, but Ann Bryan, its senior manager for external communications, told me in an e-mail that some of the studies I was citing were unreliable or unsound. When I mentioned a recent paper in the American Journal of Medical Genetics, which showed associations between a mother’s exposure to atrazine and the likelihood that her son will have an abnormally small penis, undescended testes, or a deformity of the urethra—defects that have increased in the past several decades—she said that the study had been “reviewed by independent scientists, who found numerous flaws.” She recommended that I speak with the author of the review, David Schwartz, a neuroscientist, who works for Innovative Science Solutions, a consulting firm that specializes in “product defense” and strategies that “give you the power to put your best data forward.” Schwartz told me that epidemiological studies can’t eliminate confounding variables or make claims about causation. “We’ve been incredibly misled by this type of study,” he said.

In 2012, in its settlement of the class-action suits, Syngenta agreed to pay a hundred and five million dollars to reimburse more than a thousand water systems for the cost of filtering atrazine from drinking water, but the company denies all wrongdoing. Bryan told me that “atrazine does not and, in fact, cannot cause adverse health effects at any level that people would ever be exposed to in the real-world environment.” She wrote that she was “troubled by a suggestion that we have ever tried to discredit anyone. Our focus has always been on communicating the science and setting the record straight.” She noted that “virtually every well-known brand, or even well-known issue, has a communications program behind it. Atrazine’s no different.”

Last August, Hayes put his experiments on hold. He said that his fees for animal care had risen eightfold in a decade, and that he couldn’t afford to maintain his research program. He accused the university of charging him more than other researchers in his department; in response, the director of the office of laboratory-animal care sent detailed charts illustrating that he is charged according to standard campus-wide rates, which have increased for most researchers in recent years. In an online Forbes op-ed, Jon Entine, a journalist who is listed in Syngenta’s records as a supportive “third party,” accused Hayes of being attached to conspiracy theories, and of leading the “international regulatory community on a wild goose chase,” which “borders on criminal.”

By late November, Hayes’s lab had resumed work. He was using private grants to support his students rather than to pay outstanding fees, and the lab was accumulating debt. Two days before Thanksgiving, Hayes and his students discussed their holiday plans. He was wearing an oversized orange sweatshirt, gym shorts, and running shoes, and a former student, Diana Salazar Guerrero, was eating fries that another student had left on the table. Hayes encouraged her to come to his Thanksgiving dinner and to move into the bedroom of his son, who is now a student at Oberlin. Guerrero had just put down half the deposit on a new apartment, but Hayes was disturbed by her description of her new roommate. “Are you sure you can trust him?” he asked.

Hayes had just returned from Mar del Plata, Argentina. He had flown fifteen hours and driven two hundred and fifty miles to give a thirty-minute lecture on atrazine. Guerrero said, “Sometimes I’m just, like, ‘Why don’t you let it go, Tyrone? It’s been fifteen years! How do you have the energy for this?’ ” With more scientists documenting the risks of atrazine, she assumed he’d be inclined to move on. “Originally, it was just this crazy guy at Berkeley, and you can throw the Berserkley thing at anyone,” she said. “But now the tide is turning.”

In a recent paper in the Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hayes and twenty-one other scientists applied the criteria of Sir Austin Bradford Hill, who, in 1965, outlined the conditions necessary for a causal relationship, to atrazine studies across different vertebrate classes. They argued that independent lines of evidence consistently showed that atrazine disrupts male reproductive development. Hayes’s lab was working on two more studies that explore how atrazine affects the sexual behavior of frogs. When I asked him what he would do if the E.P.A., which is conducting another review of the safety of atrazine this year, were to ban the herbicide, he joked, “I’d probably get depressed again.”

Not long ago, Hayes saw a description of himself on Wikipedia that he found disrespectful, and he wasn’t sure whether it was an attack by Syngenta or whether there were simply members of the public who thought poorly of him. He felt deflated when he remembered the arguments he’d had with Syngenta-funded pundits. “It’s one thing if you go after me because you have a philosophical disagreement with my science or if you think I’m raising alarm where there shouldn’t be any,” he said. “But they didn’t even have their own opinions. Someone was paying them to take a position.” He wondered if there was something inherently insane about the act of whistle-blowing; maybe only crazy people persisted. He was ready for a fight, but he seemed to be searching for his opponent.

One of his first graduate students, Nigel Noriega, who runs an organization devoted to conserving tropical forests, told me that he was still recovering from the experience of his atrazine research, a decade before. He had come to see science as a rigid culture, “its own club, an élite society,” Noriega said. “And Tyrone didn’t conform to the social aspects of being a scientist.” Noriega worried that the public had little understanding of the context that gives rise to scientific findings. “It is not helpful to anyone to assume that scientists are authoritative,” he said. “A good scientist spends his whole career questioning his own facts. One of the most dangerous things you can do is believe.”


Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 6, 2012 - 3:09pm

It's not just America...
Standard Chartered bank 'in $250bn scheme with Iran'

Standard Chartered bank illegally "schemed" with Iran to launder as much as $250bn (£161bn) for nearly a decade, a US regulator says.

The New York State Department of Financial Services said that the bank hid 60,000 secret transactions for "Iranian financial institutions" that were subject to US economic sanctions.

It labelled UK-based Standard Chartered a "rogue institution".

The bank has been threatened with having its US banking licence revoked.

The allegations are far larger than those involving HSBC, which was recently accused by the US Senate of failing to prevent money laundering from countries around the world including Mexico and Iran. It has set aside $700m to deal with any fines and penalties arising from those allegations.

The bank is ordered to appear before the regulator soon to "explain these apparent violations of law" from 2001 to 2010.

The rest of the story


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5