[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Celebrity Deaths - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 3, 2020 - 7:14am
 
Counting with Pictures - MarcsRadio - Aug 3, 2020 - 6:59am
 
COVID-19 - sirdroseph - Aug 3, 2020 - 5:37am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Aug 3, 2020 - 5:36am
 
Economix - rexi - Aug 3, 2020 - 12:24am
 
Florida - kcar - Aug 2, 2020 - 11:43pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottN - Aug 2, 2020 - 11:21pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Aug 2, 2020 - 8:46pm
 
Trump - R_P - Aug 2, 2020 - 7:17pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Antigone - Aug 2, 2020 - 4:42pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Antigone - Aug 2, 2020 - 2:46pm
 
A little smooth jazz never hurt anyone - rhahl - Aug 2, 2020 - 1:34pm
 
Reccomended System or Powered Speakers - miamizsun - Aug 2, 2020 - 1:31pm
 
Republican Party - westslope - Aug 2, 2020 - 12:47pm
 
Hot Dog... it's Summer! - miamizsun - Aug 2, 2020 - 12:42pm
 
songs that ROCK! - Ohmsen - Aug 2, 2020 - 11:41am
 
Little Feat tour - Ohmsen - Aug 2, 2020 - 9:51am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - R567 - Aug 2, 2020 - 9:22am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Aug 2, 2020 - 9:10am
 
TV shows you watch - Ohmsen - Aug 2, 2020 - 8:59am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Aug 2, 2020 - 7:30am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - norbertZ - Aug 2, 2020 - 5:58am
 
Fire TV App - Lyrics, Comments, Wiki, Play history - MarcsRadio - Aug 2, 2020 - 12:32am
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - BlueHeronDruid - Aug 1, 2020 - 8:51pm
 
Outstanding Covers - R_P - Aug 1, 2020 - 8:41pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Aug 1, 2020 - 5:42pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Isabeau - Aug 1, 2020 - 5:37pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - edz - Aug 1, 2020 - 4:40pm
 
What are you listening to now? - hobiejoe - Aug 1, 2020 - 2:38pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - R_P - Aug 1, 2020 - 12:49pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Aug 1, 2020 - 12:14pm
 
Democratic Party - sirdroseph - Aug 1, 2020 - 12:12pm
 
How are you coping/dealing with the crisis? - marko86 - Aug 1, 2020 - 11:03am
 
How's the weather? - Proclivities - Aug 1, 2020 - 10:40am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Aug 1, 2020 - 10:23am
 
Favorite Quotes - ScottN - Aug 1, 2020 - 10:22am
 
RP stops playing after a few minutes on Samsung Smart TV ... - MarcsRadio - Aug 1, 2020 - 8:28am
 
Misogynistic Attitudes Toward Women - Isabeau - Aug 1, 2020 - 8:13am
 
Questions. - sirdroseph - Aug 1, 2020 - 7:43am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Aug 1, 2020 - 6:22am
 
A little bit of help testing the iOS app is needed... - Ohmsen - Aug 1, 2020 - 5:09am
 
Floyd forum - Ohmsen - Aug 1, 2020 - 4:49am
 
What Did You See Today? - sirdroseph - Aug 1, 2020 - 4:25am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - kurtster - Jul 31, 2020 - 9:05pm
 
Trump Lies - Steely_D - Jul 31, 2020 - 6:07pm
 
Our tolerance for opposing views - R_P - Jul 31, 2020 - 1:06pm
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 31, 2020 - 12:56pm
 
Love & Hate - Red_Dragon - Jul 31, 2020 - 9:59am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - sirdroseph - Jul 31, 2020 - 9:37am
 
Name My Band - buddy - Jul 31, 2020 - 9:21am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - Proclivities - Jul 31, 2020 - 7:16am
 
Mars Exploration Rover Mission Status - R_P - Jul 30, 2020 - 10:53pm
 
Automotive Lust - islander - Jul 30, 2020 - 6:58pm
 
Google Home - apsteinmetz - Jul 30, 2020 - 12:55pm
 
Make Scott laugh - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 30, 2020 - 10:44am
 
Quick! I need a chicken... - miamizsun - Jul 30, 2020 - 9:35am
 
Regarding cats - sirdroseph - Jul 30, 2020 - 6:04am
 
Movie Recommendation - KarmaKarma - Jul 29, 2020 - 9:26pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - haresfur - Jul 29, 2020 - 7:59pm
 
Bolivia - westslope - Jul 29, 2020 - 1:52pm
 
A bit of light. - Proclivities - Jul 29, 2020 - 12:39pm
 
Republican Wingnut Freak of the Day - Red_Dragon - Jul 29, 2020 - 5:11am
 
Title and cover mix up? - yuel - Jul 29, 2020 - 12:16am
 
You're welcome, manbird. - buddy - Jul 28, 2020 - 9:29pm
 
Military Matters - Red_Dragon - Jul 28, 2020 - 3:58pm
 
Buddy's Haven - buddy - Jul 28, 2020 - 3:47pm
 
Random Solutions - Random Advice - buddy - Jul 28, 2020 - 3:30pm
 
Drones - westslope - Jul 28, 2020 - 9:12am
 
Ridiculously easy things to do - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 28, 2020 - 8:30am
 
New Music - Proclivities - Jul 28, 2020 - 7:18am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - kcar - Jul 27, 2020 - 2:26pm
 
Cooking for Friends.... - kcar - Jul 27, 2020 - 2:20pm
 
Reinstock '05 Link Repository - Coaxial - Jul 27, 2020 - 9:20am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jul 27, 2020 - 8:36am
 
Favorite Scriptures...Leave Pontificating at the Door - buddy - Jul 26, 2020 - 6:25pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Immigration Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 26, 27, 28
Post to this Topic
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:22pm

 steeler wrote:


There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  

 
What kind of immigration is waning from Mexico ?  Legal or illegal ?

Before Obama, there wasn't much shooting and open war on the border.  States were not calling for federal troops at the borders before Obama, to my knowledge.  US law enforcement officers were not getting killed with weapons sold by the US governent to Mexican war lords before Obama.

We didn't have an American president talking about moats and alligators for border protection before Obama.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:21pm

 steeler wrote:


There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  

 
There was no illegal immigration before Obama; nor was there crime or dwarf tossing.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:20pm

 oldslabsides wrote:


I gotta wonder why I bother posting sometimes. {#Arrowd}

 

Yep, that's the one.

Sorry, I did not scroll down even a tad. I thought I spotted in earlier in here, but then forgot about it.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:18pm

 steeler wrote:


There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  

 

I gotta wonder why I bother posting sometimes. {#Arrowd}
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:14pm

 kurtster wrote:

Did they sneak in by getting off the boat somewhere else before it docked in SF ?  No they showed up and tried to enter the old fashioned way, publicly and subject to the rules in force at the time.  Their entranced was challenged and they had their days in court.  Nothing sneaky or underhanded about how they tried to enter the country.  Yes, the California law was not a good one and it went all the way to the SCOTUS, as it should.

Arizona and the other states mirror federal law in that they are trying to enforce federal laws that are purposely not being enforced by Obama.  They are not saying what the criteria is for being here legally as was California in your example.  These states are simply determining whether or not people are here with proper federal documents and if not, capture and turn them over to the INS.  If Obama was properly performing his Constitutionally designated duties we would not have this Constitutional crisis.  This Constitutional scholar has no clue as we have seen in his outlandish statements regarding the power and duties of the SCOTUS in his attempts to bully the court into keeping the ACA intact.

 

There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 1:37pm

 aflanigan wrote:


Not according to the guy who tried to keep them out using the California law.

Setting immigration policy is, and should be, the federal government's job.  Arizona has no business setting themselves up to do it.

 
Did they sneak in by getting off the boat somewhere else before it docked in SF ?  No they showed up and tried to enter the old fashioned way, publicly and subject to the rules in force at the time.  Their entranced was challenged and they had their days in court.  Nothing sneaky or underhanded about how they tried to enter the country.  Yes, the California law was not a good one and it went all the way to the SCOTUS, as it should.

Arizona and the other states mirror federal law in that they are trying to enforce federal laws that are purposely not being enforced by Obama.  They are not saying what the criteria is for being here legally as was California in your example.  These states are simply determining whether or not people are here with proper federal documents and if not, capture and turn them over to the INS.  If Obama was properly performing his Constitutionally designated duties we would not have this Constitutional crisis.  This Constitutional scholar has no clue as we have seen in his outlandish statements regarding the power and duties of the SCOTUS in his attempts to bully the court into keeping the ACA intact.


cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 9:40am

 aflanigan wrote:
Not according to the guy who tried to keep them out using the California law.

Setting immigration policy is, and should be, the federal government's job.  Arizona has no business setting themselves up to do it.
 
Aye, there's the rub. The feds have completely abdicated their responsibility, which is why we're in this mess. The border states are trying to do something, ANYTHING, about illegal immigration, since the federal government has just kicked it around. I don't agree with the states' actions, but I understand their frustration.

aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 9:32am

 kurtster wrote:

Nice story an all.  But it is about people who tried to enter legally into this country.
 

Not according to the guy who tried to keep them out using the California law.

Setting immigration policy is, and should be, the federal government's job.  Arizona has no business setting themselves up to do it.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 6:15pm

The rate of Mexican immigration to the US has stalled or maybe even gone into reverse, an analysis shows, ending a four-decade-long trend.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 6:12pm

 aflanigan wrote:
The Case of the 22 Lewd Chinese Women

A crazy 19th-century case shows how the Supreme Court should deal with Arizona’s immigration law.


 
Nice story an all.  But it is about people who tried to enter legally into this country.

Arizona and the other states are about people who are entering illegally.  People who sneak in under the cover of darkness violating our laws and sovereignty in the process do not belong here and have no rights.  The difference is lost on most all people who beleve that being against illegal immigration is a code word for being against immigration of any kind.  That is simply not the case.  Its the biggest bunch of straw and bs that has ever been launched to defend open borders and Sanctuary Cities.  Two wrongs do not make a right and the ends do not justify the means.

California has a strange history in terms of people migrating to the Golden State.  Why just as recently as the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression, California had armed militias at its borders to keep out the Okies trying to escape the Dust Bowl.  They were coming into the state without work lined up and no means to support themselves.  Of Mice and Men, I believe, is a story about this.

But as long as people try to equate illegal immigration as legal and right, I will stand to point out the difference.  The left has tried to get rid of the term illegal immigrants and replace it with the newly politically correct term undocumented immigrants in an effort to change the spin.  Bullpuckey.

There is nothing wrong with legal immigration and there are rules for a reason.  To say that there is no such thing as illegal immigration which is what you ( I assume, though please correct me if I am wrong ) and the supporters of open borders and Sanctuary Cities claim is just plain wrong.

I am always willing to discuss this topic.


aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 8:14am

The Case of the 22 Lewd Chinese Women

A crazy 19th-century case shows how the Supreme Court should deal with Arizona’s immigration law.

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 26, 27, 28