[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

What did you have for lunch? - oldviolin - Feb 27, 2020 - 1:06pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - haresfur - Feb 27, 2020 - 1:02pm
 
Recommended documentaries - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Feb 27, 2020 - 12:52pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Feb 27, 2020 - 11:51am
 
songs that ROCK! - Proclivities - Feb 27, 2020 - 11:34am
 
Bernie Sanders - R_P - Feb 27, 2020 - 10:41am
 
COVID-19 - Proclivities - Feb 27, 2020 - 10:24am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Coaxial - Feb 27, 2020 - 9:33am
 
Interesting or Weird Cover Versions - Proclivities - Feb 27, 2020 - 9:12am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Feb 27, 2020 - 7:23am
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Feb 27, 2020 - 6:57am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Feb 27, 2020 - 6:44am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Feb 27, 2020 - 4:46am
 
Name My Band - Red_Dragon - Feb 27, 2020 - 4:41am
 
Baseball, anyone? - SeriousLee - Feb 27, 2020 - 2:29am
 
Stream links not working - psychokiller - Feb 27, 2020 - 2:19am
 
The War on Women - sirdroseph - Feb 27, 2020 - 2:15am
 
Guns - sirdroseph - Feb 27, 2020 - 1:41am
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Feb 27, 2020 - 12:56am
 
The Obituary Page - Antigone - Feb 26, 2020 - 6:17pm
 
NASA & other news from space - haresfur - Feb 26, 2020 - 6:00pm
 
Environment - haresfur - Feb 26, 2020 - 5:50pm
 
Trump Lies - Red_Dragon - Feb 26, 2020 - 4:45pm
 
Back to the 10's - rhahl - Feb 26, 2020 - 3:47pm
 
Happy RP Anniversary! - jahgirl8 - Feb 26, 2020 - 2:47pm
 
Immigration - jahgirl8 - Feb 26, 2020 - 2:38pm
 
Republican Party - R_P - Feb 26, 2020 - 2:30pm
 
WikiLeaks - R_P - Feb 26, 2020 - 2:07pm
 
Canada - R_P - Feb 26, 2020 - 1:07pm
 
New Music - Proclivities - Feb 26, 2020 - 12:42pm
 
Russia - sirdroseph - Feb 26, 2020 - 11:53am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Feb 26, 2020 - 11:44am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Feb 26, 2020 - 10:54am
 
Birthday wishes - BlueHeronDruid - Feb 26, 2020 - 10:27am
 
Dog - sirdroseph - Feb 26, 2020 - 9:51am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Proclivities - Feb 26, 2020 - 6:24am
 
Automotive Lust - Red_Dragon - Feb 26, 2020 - 4:37am
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - sirdroseph - Feb 26, 2020 - 2:36am
 
shoutcast down? - hacknase - Feb 26, 2020 - 1:26am
 
Age old problem - RP cutting out on NAIM products - tom14 - Feb 26, 2020 - 1:03am
 
What are you listening to now? - jahgirl8 - Feb 25, 2020 - 8:09pm
 
The House I Want (Today) - jahgirl8 - Feb 25, 2020 - 5:41pm
 
Best Song Comments. - haresfur - Feb 25, 2020 - 2:58pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Feb 25, 2020 - 2:32pm
 
Play the Blues - black321 - Feb 25, 2020 - 1:53pm
 
Slide Show Sync - darshan - Feb 25, 2020 - 1:16pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 25, 2020 - 12:22pm
 
A motivational quote - R_P - Feb 25, 2020 - 11:43am
 
Content missing from forum posts prior to ~ 23rd July 2008 - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Feb 25, 2020 - 10:28am
 
Things You Thought Today - jahgirl8 - Feb 25, 2020 - 10:12am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Feb 25, 2020 - 10:06am
 
Streaming addresses currently down? - SoupLadle - Feb 25, 2020 - 9:00am
 
The Green Thread: A place to share info about living a gr... - Proclivities - Feb 25, 2020 - 7:59am
 
Mardi Gras, mon cher! - Steely_D - Feb 25, 2020 - 7:45am
 
Sonos - BillG - Feb 25, 2020 - 6:32am
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Feb 24, 2020 - 6:56pm
 
Show us your NEW _______________!!!! - KurtfromLaQuinta - Feb 24, 2020 - 6:51pm
 
Photos you haven't taken of yourself - KurtfromLaQuinta - Feb 24, 2020 - 6:35pm
 
President Elizabeth Warren - haresfur - Feb 24, 2020 - 6:25pm
 
::yesterday:: - haresfur - Feb 24, 2020 - 5:53pm
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - haresfur - Feb 24, 2020 - 5:45pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - jahgirl8 - Feb 24, 2020 - 4:30pm
 
Local Scandals, politics and news - oldviolin - Feb 24, 2020 - 3:55pm
 
2020 Elections - jahgirl8 - Feb 24, 2020 - 3:16pm
 
Public Messages in a Private Forum - jahgirl8 - Feb 24, 2020 - 2:41pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Feb 24, 2020 - 11:32am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Lazy8 - Feb 24, 2020 - 9:15am
 
Live Music - jahgirl8 - Feb 23, 2020 - 4:40pm
 
Acid Tongue Protest! - jahgirl8 - Feb 23, 2020 - 4:31pm
 
Pick a sport, any sport - jahgirl8 - Feb 23, 2020 - 3:14pm
 
The Best Margaritas! - haresfur - Feb 23, 2020 - 2:12pm
 
American Oil Strikes Again - Red_Dragon - Feb 23, 2020 - 1:01pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - SeriousLee - Feb 23, 2020 - 9:28am
 
Movie Quote - SeriousLee - Feb 23, 2020 - 7:34am
 
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey - SeriousLee - Feb 23, 2020 - 5:46am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Immigration Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27
Post to this Topic
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 3:28pm

 kurtster wrote:


I thought we were talking about legal versus illegal immigration and its present situation.  Everyone keeps changing the subject by trying to talk about it in the past tense and trying to ingnore that there is an illegal immigration problem by painting those against illegal immigration as being against any kind of immigration.  I'm trying to keep it on what is happening now.

Sure we can talk about how we got here, but that doesn't matter anymore, does it ?  We now have a Constitutional crisis manufactured because of our current POTUS' position on illegal immigration and what sovreignty is.

Why he is so concerned about about it that he is promising to get it fixed in the first year of his second term, just like he promised to do in the first year of his first term.  Gimme a flippin break.

Any conversation on the subject has to include and be about who is currently in charge and responsible for the current situation, doesn't it ?  Or would you simply like to talk about straw ?

 

Paragraph 1:  I believe  those advocating building a fence on the border were concerned with illegal immigration and terrorism.  I did not change the subject. Those advocating that the fence be built were doing so before Obama took office.  

Paragraph 2:  It is an issue before the Supreme Court.  I would not label it a constitutional crisis. It is a federal pre-emption issue that is rather nuanced, but it is not manufactured by Obama as you seem to believe and have implied.  

Paragraphs 3 and 4: lllegal immigration from Mexico, or through Mexico, has been a problem for a long time. It is fair to focus on what we are doing about it now. But, per usual, your earlier posts assailed Obama and implied that the problem has grown exponentially during Obama's term.     


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 3:02pm

 steeler wrote:


What are you talking about?

Talk about building a fence along the border between Mexico and the U.S. surfaced well before Obama took office.

See, for example:

House Resolution 6061 (H.R. 6061), "Secure Fence Act of 2006", was introduced on September 13, 2006. It passed through the U.S. House of Representatives on September 14, 2006 with a vote of 283–138.



 

I thought we were talking about legal versus illegal immigration and its present situation.  Everyone keeps changing the subject by trying to talk about it in the past tense and trying to ingnore that there is an illegal immigration problem by painting those against illegal immigration as being against any kind of immigration.  I'm trying to keep it on what is happening now.

Sure we can talk about how we got here, but that doesn't matter anymore, does it ?  We now have a Constitutional crisis manufactured because of our current POTUS' position on illegal immigration and what sovreignty is.

Why he is so concerned about about it that he is promising to get it fixed in the first year of his second term, just like he promised to do in the first year of his first term.  Gimme a flippin break.

Any conversation on the subject has to include and be about who is currently in charge and responsible for the current situation, doesn't it ?  Or would you simply like to talk about straw ?


Monkeysdad

Monkeysdad Avatar

Location: Simi Valley, CA
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:55pm

 steeler wrote:


There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  

 
Heard it on NPR yesterday too. But that's all it's doing, waning, not down dramatically, waning. Less jobs to cross the border for = waning, not "the issue is fixed"...come an economic recovery, which we all know is just around the corner the problem will resurface.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:31pm

 kurtster wrote:


OK, screw the immigration issue then.  We have a full tilt flippin war on the border that wasn't happenning before 2009.

 
Legalize it.{#Cowboy}I agree Obama is not handling our relationship with Mexico and the drug war any better than the rest of em.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:29pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yep, no one has ever talked about illegal immigration before January 2009. That was the first time I ever heard of anyone entering this country illegally.

 

OK, screw the immigration issue then.  We have a full tilt flippin war on the border that wasn't happenning before 2009.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:29pm

 kurtster wrote:

What kind of immigration is waning from Mexico ?  Legal or illegal ?

Before Obama, there wasn't much shooting and open war on the border.  States were not calling for federal troops at the borders before Obama, to my knowledge.  US law enforcement officers were not getting killed with weapons sold by the US governent to Mexican war lords before Obama.

We didn't have an American president talking about moats and alligators for border protection before Obama.

 

What are you talking about?

Talk about building a fence along the border between Mexico and the U.S. surfaced well before Obama took office.

See, for example:

House Resolution 6061 (H.R. 6061), "Secure Fence Act of 2006", was introduced on September 13, 2006. It passed through the U.S. House of Representatives on September 14, 2006 with a vote of 283–138.


steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:25pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

There was no illegal immigration before Obama; nor was there crime or dwarf tossing.

 

No terrorism, either.  And no al-Queda, war in Iraq, war in Afghanistan, strife in Pakistan. All that amped up when Obama took office. Bin Laden did not exist as a threat until he was taken out under Obama's watch.  Wait . . . that last one isn't coming out the way it should.    


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:25pm

 kurtster wrote:

What kind of immigration is waning from Mexico ?  Legal or illegal ?

Before Obama, there wasn't much shooting and open war on the border.  States were not calling for federal troops at the borders before Obama, to my knowledge.  US law enforcement officers were not getting killed with weapons sold by the US governent to Mexican war lords before Obama.

We didn't have an American president talking about moats and alligators for border protection before Obama.

 
Yep, no one has ever talked about illegal immigration before January 2009. That was the first time I ever heard of anyone entering this country illegally.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:22pm

 steeler wrote:


There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  

 
What kind of immigration is waning from Mexico ?  Legal or illegal ?

Before Obama, there wasn't much shooting and open war on the border.  States were not calling for federal troops at the borders before Obama, to my knowledge.  US law enforcement officers were not getting killed with weapons sold by the US governent to Mexican war lords before Obama.

We didn't have an American president talking about moats and alligators for border protection before Obama.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:21pm

 steeler wrote:


There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  

 
There was no illegal immigration before Obama; nor was there crime or dwarf tossing.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:20pm

 oldslabsides wrote:


I gotta wonder why I bother posting sometimes. {#Arrowd}

 

Yep, that's the one.

Sorry, I did not scroll down even a tad. I thought I spotted in earlier in here, but then forgot about it.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:18pm

 steeler wrote:


There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  

 

I gotta wonder why I bother posting sometimes. {#Arrowd}
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 2:14pm

 kurtster wrote:

Did they sneak in by getting off the boat somewhere else before it docked in SF ?  No they showed up and tried to enter the old fashioned way, publicly and subject to the rules in force at the time.  Their entranced was challenged and they had their days in court.  Nothing sneaky or underhanded about how they tried to enter the country.  Yes, the California law was not a good one and it went all the way to the SCOTUS, as it should.

Arizona and the other states mirror federal law in that they are trying to enforce federal laws that are purposely not being enforced by Obama.  They are not saying what the criteria is for being here legally as was California in your example.  These states are simply determining whether or not people are here with proper federal documents and if not, capture and turn them over to the INS.  If Obama was properly performing his Constitutionally designated duties we would not have this Constitutional crisis.  This Constitutional scholar has no clue as we have seen in his outlandish statements regarding the power and duties of the SCOTUS in his attempts to bully the court into keeping the ACA intact.

 

There was little illegal immigration before Obama?

I just read a story in the Washington Post the other day about how the immigration from Mexico is waning.  
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 1:37pm

 aflanigan wrote:


Not according to the guy who tried to keep them out using the California law.

Setting immigration policy is, and should be, the federal government's job.  Arizona has no business setting themselves up to do it.

 
Did they sneak in by getting off the boat somewhere else before it docked in SF ?  No they showed up and tried to enter the old fashioned way, publicly and subject to the rules in force at the time.  Their entranced was challenged and they had their days in court.  Nothing sneaky or underhanded about how they tried to enter the country.  Yes, the California law was not a good one and it went all the way to the SCOTUS, as it should.

Arizona and the other states mirror federal law in that they are trying to enforce federal laws that are purposely not being enforced by Obama.  They are not saying what the criteria is for being here legally as was California in your example.  These states are simply determining whether or not people are here with proper federal documents and if not, capture and turn them over to the INS.  If Obama was properly performing his Constitutionally designated duties we would not have this Constitutional crisis.  This Constitutional scholar has no clue as we have seen in his outlandish statements regarding the power and duties of the SCOTUS in his attempts to bully the court into keeping the ACA intact.


cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 9:40am

 aflanigan wrote:
Not according to the guy who tried to keep them out using the California law.

Setting immigration policy is, and should be, the federal government's job.  Arizona has no business setting themselves up to do it.
 
Aye, there's the rub. The feds have completely abdicated their responsibility, which is why we're in this mess. The border states are trying to do something, ANYTHING, about illegal immigration, since the federal government has just kicked it around. I don't agree with the states' actions, but I understand their frustration.

aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 25, 2012 - 9:32am

 kurtster wrote:

Nice story an all.  But it is about people who tried to enter legally into this country.
 

Not according to the guy who tried to keep them out using the California law.

Setting immigration policy is, and should be, the federal government's job.  Arizona has no business setting themselves up to do it.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 6:15pm

The rate of Mexican immigration to the US has stalled or maybe even gone into reverse, an analysis shows, ending a four-decade-long trend.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 6:12pm

 aflanigan wrote:
The Case of the 22 Lewd Chinese Women

A crazy 19th-century case shows how the Supreme Court should deal with Arizona’s immigration law.


 
Nice story an all.  But it is about people who tried to enter legally into this country.

Arizona and the other states are about people who are entering illegally.  People who sneak in under the cover of darkness violating our laws and sovereignty in the process do not belong here and have no rights.  The difference is lost on most all people who beleve that being against illegal immigration is a code word for being against immigration of any kind.  That is simply not the case.  Its the biggest bunch of straw and bs that has ever been launched to defend open borders and Sanctuary Cities.  Two wrongs do not make a right and the ends do not justify the means.

California has a strange history in terms of people migrating to the Golden State.  Why just as recently as the Dust Bowl and the Great Depression, California had armed militias at its borders to keep out the Okies trying to escape the Dust Bowl.  They were coming into the state without work lined up and no means to support themselves.  Of Mice and Men, I believe, is a story about this.

But as long as people try to equate illegal immigration as legal and right, I will stand to point out the difference.  The left has tried to get rid of the term illegal immigrants and replace it with the newly politically correct term undocumented immigrants in an effort to change the spin.  Bullpuckey.

There is nothing wrong with legal immigration and there are rules for a reason.  To say that there is no such thing as illegal immigration which is what you ( I assume, though please correct me if I am wrong ) and the supporters of open borders and Sanctuary Cities claim is just plain wrong.

I am always willing to discuss this topic.


aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 24, 2012 - 8:14am

The Case of the 22 Lewd Chinese Women

A crazy 19th-century case shows how the Supreme Court should deal with Arizona’s immigration law.

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27