[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

HomeKit HomePod AppleTV - gtufano - Jun 18, 2019 - 12:57am
 
American Oil Strikes Again - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 17, 2019 - 9:30pm
 
Trump - R_P - Jun 17, 2019 - 4:11pm
 
Name My Band - Red_Dragon - Jun 17, 2019 - 3:55pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Jun 17, 2019 - 3:39pm
 
Music News - R_P - Jun 17, 2019 - 3:07pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Jun 17, 2019 - 2:47pm
 
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc) - miamizsun - Jun 17, 2019 - 12:41pm
 
Iran - R_P - Jun 17, 2019 - 11:50am
 
Getting RP in For iPad Mini 2 - Ian_and_Annie - Jun 17, 2019 - 10:12am
 
Recommended documentaries - sirdroseph - Jun 17, 2019 - 10:02am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Jun 17, 2019 - 7:49am
 
Great guitar faces - Proclivities - Jun 17, 2019 - 7:02am
 
How's the weather? - miamizsun - Jun 17, 2019 - 4:43am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Antigone - Jun 17, 2019 - 2:56am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Jun 17, 2019 - 12:33am
 
Things You Thought Today - buddy - Jun 16, 2019 - 9:07pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - rmgman - Jun 16, 2019 - 5:22pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jun 16, 2019 - 2:46pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jun 16, 2019 - 2:12pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Jun 16, 2019 - 1:02pm
 
Trump Lies - westslope - Jun 16, 2019 - 11:59am
 
Race in America - kurtster - Jun 15, 2019 - 6:50pm
 
New Music - R_P - Jun 15, 2019 - 10:49am
 
President Elizabeth Warren - hayduke2 - Jun 15, 2019 - 10:23am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jun 14, 2019 - 7:55pm
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Jun 14, 2019 - 6:51pm
 
Photoshop Help please - echols - Jun 14, 2019 - 5:06pm
 
Rock mix miss you - Arc_Light - Jun 14, 2019 - 4:31pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - miamizsun - Jun 14, 2019 - 3:52pm
 
Anti-War - R_P - Jun 14, 2019 - 3:27pm
 
First World Problems - miamizsun - Jun 14, 2019 - 2:59pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jun 14, 2019 - 2:47pm
 
Weird sounds - Red_Dragon - Jun 14, 2019 - 11:17am
 
Weight Loss Discussions - westslope - Jun 14, 2019 - 9:21am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jun 14, 2019 - 8:08am
 
Basketball, anyone? Hello? Hello? - Proclivities - Jun 14, 2019 - 6:04am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - sunybuny - Jun 14, 2019 - 5:38am
 
war is a racket - islander - Jun 13, 2019 - 9:43pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Jun 13, 2019 - 5:39pm
 
Canada - westslope - Jun 13, 2019 - 3:55pm
 
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey - SeriousLee - Jun 13, 2019 - 3:17pm
 
Outstanding Covers - SeriousLee - Jun 13, 2019 - 3:15pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Jun 13, 2019 - 2:52pm
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Jun 13, 2019 - 1:42pm
 
Thought For The Day - oldviolin - Jun 13, 2019 - 1:40pm
 
Brain-Boosting (memory enhancement) - Proclivities - Jun 13, 2019 - 1:34pm
 
Overheard - SeriousLee - Jun 13, 2019 - 1:23pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - SeriousLee - Jun 13, 2019 - 1:17pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Jun 13, 2019 - 12:05pm
 
Regarding dogs - oldviolin - Jun 13, 2019 - 11:08am
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Jun 13, 2019 - 10:06am
 
Export rated songs playlist - - Jun 13, 2019 - 8:27am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - black321 - Jun 13, 2019 - 7:19am
 
OUR CATS!! - kurtster - Jun 13, 2019 - 4:35am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jun 12, 2019 - 2:29pm
 
Bit Rate Resolution in BlueSound? - black321 - Jun 12, 2019 - 2:08pm
 
The russian guy in "Thanks for listening" - BillG - Jun 12, 2019 - 1:52pm
 
Music Videos - sirdroseph - Jun 12, 2019 - 12:28pm
 
Environment - westslope - Jun 12, 2019 - 11:38am
 
Best Song Comments. - sirdroseph - Jun 12, 2019 - 11:34am
 
Why Everything You Believe Is Immoral, Irresponsible, Irr... - oldviolin - Jun 12, 2019 - 10:42am
 
Your Office - Coaxial - Jun 12, 2019 - 9:17am
 
American Justice - westslope - Jun 12, 2019 - 7:16am
 
Immigration - sirdroseph - Jun 12, 2019 - 6:51am
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Jun 12, 2019 - 6:19am
 
France - oldjack - Jun 12, 2019 - 12:45am
 
Radiohead - R_P - Jun 11, 2019 - 12:05pm
 
What is Humanity's best invention? - Proclivities - Jun 11, 2019 - 7:42am
 
Movement in the doom groove - Proclivities - Jun 11, 2019 - 6:58am
 
Afghanistan - black321 - Jun 11, 2019 - 6:56am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 11, 2019 - 1:20am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - kurtster - Jun 10, 2019 - 11:57pm
 
WikiLeaks - R_P - Jun 10, 2019 - 4:54pm
 
So... what's been happening here lately? - kcar - Jun 10, 2019 - 4:03pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Ask an Atheist Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 49, 50, 51  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 28, 2015 - 6:03pm

 kurtster wrote:
So atheists have no fear of dying.  Ok ...

And what does pain have to do with dying ?  Seems totally unrelated to me.  Two separate issues.

Seems like much ado about nothing.  

Oh well, on to other things.  Have a nice day.
 
Pain (suffering) was used as a sort of control group vs. the idea of what people believe happens when you die. The latter may include the strange idea you'll end up in some form of hell (as threatened by some religions). This obviously has zero impact on most atheists since they don't drink the kool-aid.

It's fairly obvious that the process of dying can be very painful and that the idea of a protracted period of suffering may be stressful in itself to some people (hence euthanasia). Atheists are not immune to the possibility of having to endure suffering as the end approaches. I think most of us would prefer to simply pass away during a good night's sleep.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 28, 2015 - 5:32pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
Why Atheists Terrify Believers
Their presence challenges fundamental defense mechanisms that protect people from fear of death.

 
So atheists have no fear of dying.  Ok ...

And what does pain have to do with dying ?  Seems totally unrelated to me.  Two separate issues.

Seems like much ado about nothing.  

Oh well, on to other things.  Have a nice day. 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 28, 2015 - 2:30pm

I Asked Atheists How They Find Meaning In A Purposeless Universe


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 31, 2015 - 9:40pm

Teens are fleeing religion like never before: Massive new study exposes religion’s decline

(...) “These trends are part of a larger cultural context, a context that is often missing in polls about religion,” Twenge says. “One context is rising individualism in U.S. culture. Individualism puts the self first, which doesn’t always fit well with the commitment to the institution and other people that religion often requires. As Americans become more individualistic, it makes sense that fewer would commit to religion.”

The study also notes an “increasing acknowledgment that religion is not consistent with scientific understanding” could be driving adolescents away from religion.  It is possible that “debates about teaching creationism or intelligent design in U.S. schools, such as those in Kansas in 2005, pushed some young people away from religion,” Twenge and her colleagues write in the study.

The generational decline of religion’s appeal in America has been documented in other studies as well, including one published last year by Massachusetts computer scientist Allen Downey. Downey’s conclusion as to why Americans are turning to atheism contrasts with Twenge’s, however. As noted by the MIT Technology review, Downey finds unprecedented access to information afforded by the Internet to be a major factor in determining a person’s inclination to embrace religion. The Internet, Downey argues, could be as significant a variable as childhood religious upbringing in influencing an individual’s spiritual outcomes.


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 6, 2015 - 8:54am

Why Atheists Terrify Believers
Their presence challenges fundamental defense mechanisms that protect people from fear of death.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 21, 2015 - 2:04pm

Atheists Are as Emotionally Healthy as Believers - Pacific Standard
New research questions the link between religiosity and mental health.

Is being a believer beneficial to one’s mental health? That's the conclusion of much psychological research, which points to both the social support of belonging to a congregation, and the stress-reducing qualities of knowing that a larger force is looking out for you.

But a newly published study challenges those beliefs. Analyzing answers provided by a large and diverse group of participants, it finds “secular and religious adherents have similar levels of mental health.”

“The impaired mental health stigma against secular (individuals) is, at the very least, an exaggeration,” write Jon T. Moore of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System in Palo Alto, California, and Mark Leach of the University of Louisville. Their research is published in the journal Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. (...)


Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 16, 2015 - 2:24pm

In honor of Ask An Atheist Day I present a cobbled-together documentary on the life and letters of Christopher Hitchens.

'The Hitch'- Christopher Hitchens documentary from Kristoffer Hellesmark on Vimeo.


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Apr 6, 2015 - 3:13pm

Fox & Friends Says Protecting Atheists From Discrimination Is Anti-Christian! | Crooks and Liars


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 6:38pm

 haresfur wrote:

Memory is the second thing to go.

 
Response moved here
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 6:07pm

 kurtster wrote:

I stand corrected.  I see that I vehemently rejected the notion back then.  There were also opinions said that reinforced my thoughts.  Perhaps that is why I forgot.

A long time in between.  Not making any excuses.  Well if nothing else, I'm not afraid to review my beliefs and change them as time passes and input changes.  I'll take that as a positive.  I really do seek to get things right.  This one is closed and over.

Thanks for clearing this up, seriously.

 

 
Memory is the second thing to go.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 5:02pm

 Prodigal_SOB wrote: 
I stand corrected.  I see that I vehemently rejected the notion back then.  There were also opinions said that reinforced my thoughts.  Perhaps that is why I forgot.

A long time in between.  Not making any excuses.  Well if nothing else, I'm not afraid to review my beliefs and change them as time passes and input changes.  I'll take that as a positive.  I really do seek to get things right.  This one is closed and over.

Thanks for clearing this up, seriously.

 
Prodigal_SOB

Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 4:34pm

 kurtster wrote:

Actually not.  I sure as hell wouldn't put it up again in these circumstances if it had.  I freely admit to getting things wrong when I do, but I never go about deliberately misleading anyone here on anything.  My original intent in posting it way back when was to find an explanation for the picture.  I never got one.

If it was discussed it was discussed in a thread different from where the picture was posted with everyone having a good laugh on me and I missed it.  It woulda been nice if someone had mentioned it to me directly if it was already discussed.  But that is the way of this place at times.

 
See here Oct 2009


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 4:12pm

 JrzyTmata wrote:

I'm pretty sure the camera strap theory was discussed here before.

 
Actually not.  I sure as hell wouldn't put it up again in these circumstances if it had.  I freely admit to getting things wrong when I do, but I never go about deliberately misleading anyone here on anything.  My original intent in posting it way back when was to find an explanation for the picture.  I never got one.

If it was discussed it was discussed in a thread different from where the picture was posted with everyone having a good laugh on me and I missed it.  It woulda been nice if someone had mentioned it to me directly if it was already discussed.  But that is the way of this place at times.
JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 3:40pm

 kurtster wrote:

Thanks for the straight answer to a straight question.

The coincidences part was tongue in cheek about having enough reservations to not share it with the home owner because I admitted that 'I don't know' what it was to myself and was not sure enough to offer it up for what I thought it might be.  I offered it up here the same way.  Here's a picture that I took that has been seen here several times over the years and I'm still looking for an explanation.  I finally got one and accepted it gladly.  I just wish that I had gotten this explanation many years ago.

 
I'm pretty sure the camera strap theory was discussed here before.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 2:09pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

Far from a pro here (though I have produced images with fingers and straps in front of the lens), but if it had autofocus, it got the fabric right (in focus) and thus it can't focus on the much nearer strap. You could end up with a variety of pictures depending on where the focus ends up. The size and position of the strap will likely be a factor too. More a question for "Ask a photographer".

Coincidence exists (though, like "free will", that too could be argued endlessly if need be), however sometimes a coincidence isn't what it appears to be. {#Wink}

 
Thanks for the straight answer to a straight question.

The coincidences part was tongue in cheek about having enough reservations to not share it with the home owner because I admitted that 'I don't know' what it was to myself and was not sure enough to offer it up for what I thought it might be.  I offered it up here the same way.  Here's a picture that I took that has been seen here several times over the years and I'm still looking for an explanation.  I finally got one and accepted it gladly.  I just wish that I had gotten this explanation many years ago.
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 11:02am

 kurtster wrote:
What still has me wondering is how the image of the fabric is still crystal clear behind an opaque object.  I get the shadows, 
 
 If you "get" the shadows, it's not much of a leap to "getting" the foreground object's softness and translucence as well.


Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 10:23am

kurtster wrote:

ok, did some searching and found some similar images of a camera strap in a picture.  Very likely possibility.  Many people have seen it over the years and you are the first to mention the strap.  Its prolly a 101 level error for a pro to immediately see.  So I happily accept this explanation and it makes me glad we held back the photo from the owner.  

What still has me wondering is how the image of the fabric is still crystal clear behind an opaque object.  I get the shadows, but the clarity of the fabric piece still does not compute.  All the other images I saw clearly obscured all detail behind them.

So does this confirm or refute the notion that there are no coincidences ?

You can't prove there are no anythings, all you can prove is you haven't seen one yet. But even one is proof that there are coincidences.

But this isn't a coincidence, it's a failure to identify something compounded by speculation that the misidentified thing had a supernatural origin. Most claims of the paranormal are similar: I can't explain it, so it must be a ghost/UFO/bigfoot/a massive conspiracy by the Freemasons, Illuminati, the NSA, and the Post Office/god's will. They are leaps to a conclusion that can't be challenged because it isn't supported by anything but an inability to understand natural phenomena.

Our ability (as a species) to understand natural phenomena gets better and better, and the realm of miracles and the supernatural shrinks. In this case we didn't have to extend the reach of science at all to explain what you had seen, but the task of curating and extending science and human understanding of the natural world is never-ending.

It's like building a vast sand castle. The bigger the base of fundamental understanding gets the higher we can build it and the farther we can see from on top, but as we add to the top waves of irrationality lap at the base. Tides of ignorance and superstition occasionally wash in and make the whole project seem in doubt. And sometimes the castle only looks tall because you dug the sand from around the base.

We have a long ways to go as a species before most of us are comfortable saying "I don't know" when asked why something happened instead of just reverting to a familiar superstition. We have even further to go before we can feel the curiosity to fill in those gaps in our knowledge with more knowledge rather than plastering them over with myth.


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 9:56am

 kurtster wrote:
ok, did some searching and found some similar images of a camera strap in a picture.  Very likely possibility.  Many people have seen it over the years and you are the first to mention the strap.  Its prolly a 101 level error for a pro to immediately see.  So I happily accept this explanation and it makes me glad we held back the photo from the owner.  

What still has me wondering is how the image of the fabric is still crystal clear behind an opaque object.  I get the shadows, but the clarity of the fabric piece still does not compute.  All the other images I saw clearly obscured all detail behind them.

So does this confirm or refute the notion that there are no coincidences ?
 
Far from a pro here (though I have produced images with fingers and straps in front of the lens), but if it had autofocus, it got the fabric right (in focus) and thus it can't focus on the much nearer strap. You could end up with a variety of pictures depending on where the focus ends up. The size and position of the strap will likely be a factor too. More a question for "Ask a photographer".

Coincidence exists (though, like "free will", that too could be argued endlessly if need be), however sometimes a coincidence isn't what it appears to be. {#Wink}
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 9:05am

 RichardPrins wrote:

Looks like the camera strap (or something similar. Dreadlocks? {#Mrgreen}) was in front of the lens...

 
ok, did some searching and found some similar images of a camera strap in a picture.  Very likely possibility.  Many people have seen it over the years and you are the first to mention the strap.  Its prolly a 101 level error for a pro to immediately see.  So I happily accept this explanation and it makes me glad we held back the photo from the owner.  

What still has me wondering is how the image of the fabric is still crystal clear behind an opaque object.  I get the shadows, but the clarity of the fabric piece still does not compute.  All the other images I saw clearly obscured all detail behind them.

So does this confirm or refute the notion that there are no coincidences ?

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2015 - 8:32am

 kurtster wrote:


  SPIRITUAL 1
 
 
Ghosts cast shadows! 
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 49, 50, 51  Next