[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Trump - westslope - Mar 28, 2020 - 2:51pm
 
Canada - westslope - Mar 28, 2020 - 2:39pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Mar 28, 2020 - 2:14pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - BlueHeronDruid - Mar 28, 2020 - 1:08pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2020 - 12:43pm
 
Flower Pictures - kcar - Mar 28, 2020 - 12:22pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - Mar 28, 2020 - 11:49am
 
how do you feel right now? - Coaxial - Mar 28, 2020 - 11:03am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - GeneP59 - Mar 28, 2020 - 10:55am
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Mar 28, 2020 - 10:51am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Mar 28, 2020 - 10:18am
 
Airplay - jbuhl - Mar 28, 2020 - 9:47am
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2020 - 8:22am
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2020 - 8:17am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - sirdroseph - Mar 28, 2020 - 4:45am
 
What Did You See Today? - Paul_Andreev - Mar 28, 2020 - 2:52am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Mar 28, 2020 - 12:06am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - buddy - Mar 27, 2020 - 5:16pm
 
Joe Biden - hayduke2 - Mar 27, 2020 - 4:56pm
 
Funny Videos - kcar - Mar 27, 2020 - 4:28pm
 
Last gas price paid? - katzendogs - Mar 27, 2020 - 3:39pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ndg - Mar 27, 2020 - 1:24pm
 
Economix - R_P - Mar 27, 2020 - 1:13pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2020 - 1:09pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Mar 27, 2020 - 11:31am
 
songs that ROCK! - Lazy8 - Mar 27, 2020 - 10:29am
 
Automotive Lust - Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2020 - 8:34am
 
Change mix channel on RP app - BillG - Mar 27, 2020 - 7:56am
 
Things You Thought Today - sirdroseph - Mar 27, 2020 - 7:55am
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Mar 27, 2020 - 6:32am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 26, 2020 - 11:24pm
 
Rhetorical questions - oldviolin - Mar 26, 2020 - 10:38pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Mar 26, 2020 - 5:54pm
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - Coaxial - Mar 26, 2020 - 3:56pm
 
What are you listening to now? - Steely_D - Mar 26, 2020 - 2:32pm
 
Quick! I need a chicken... - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 26, 2020 - 1:26pm
 
Help!!!!!!!! - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2020 - 1:26pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Mar 26, 2020 - 11:12am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 26, 2020 - 10:20am
 
Public Messages in a Private Forum - kurtster - Mar 26, 2020 - 6:49am
 
Music Videos - whatshisname - Mar 25, 2020 - 10:48pm
 
Trump Lies - kurtster - Mar 25, 2020 - 9:45pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - jahgirl8 - Mar 25, 2020 - 5:38pm
 
Democratic Party - jahgirl8 - Mar 25, 2020 - 5:18pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - jahgirl8 - Mar 25, 2020 - 5:14pm
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2020 - 7:29am
 
THANK YOU GUYS - dawnbland - Mar 25, 2020 - 7:07am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2020 - 6:30pm
 
Preferred media player? - gvajda - Mar 24, 2020 - 4:05pm
 
Get the Quote - oldviolin - Mar 24, 2020 - 11:54am
 
Unresearched Conspiracy Theories - miamizsun - Mar 24, 2020 - 6:17am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - sirdroseph - Mar 24, 2020 - 2:42am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Mar 23, 2020 - 5:12pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - westslope - Mar 23, 2020 - 3:16pm
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Mar 23, 2020 - 9:42am
 
Things that make you sick - sirdroseph - Mar 23, 2020 - 2:36am
 
Art Show - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 22, 2020 - 11:33pm
 
Amazon Products (May Contain Spam) - BlueHeronDruid - Mar 22, 2020 - 4:01pm
 
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet - gvajda - Mar 22, 2020 - 11:52am
 
Thanks Bill, Rebecca, and crew! - steeler - Mar 22, 2020 - 10:33am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Isabeau - Mar 22, 2020 - 8:56am
 
Coffee - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 21, 2020 - 9:20am
 
Celebrity Deaths - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 21, 2020 - 12:22am
 
Pick a sport, any sport - haresfur - Mar 20, 2020 - 11:38pm
 
World Music - jahgirl8 - Mar 20, 2020 - 7:32pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Mar 20, 2020 - 6:45pm
 
PSD for Roku - mshafe - Mar 20, 2020 - 3:51pm
 
Climate Change - westslope - Mar 20, 2020 - 3:26pm
 
Contemporary québécois music - westslope - Mar 20, 2020 - 3:21pm
 
Drinking Establishments - oldviolin - Mar 20, 2020 - 1:59pm
 
music that makes you dance with big wavy gestures - buddy - Mar 20, 2020 - 8:55am
 
Poetry Forum - buddy - Mar 20, 2020 - 8:28am
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - jahgirl8 - Mar 19, 2020 - 3:38pm
 
Tomato Gardens - Red_Dragon - Mar 19, 2020 - 1:08pm
 
That's good advice - Steely_D - Mar 19, 2020 - 12:32pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Anti-War Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 20, 21, 22  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 15, 2012 - 6:25pm


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 11, 2012 - 7:13am

Veterans for Peace convene in Miami

 

The pro-peace organization is having its national convention in downtown Miami this week, looking at past U.S. military involvement in Latin America to learn lessons for the future.

 

aedgerton@MiamiHerald.com

With pamphlets and peace buttons, bumper stickers and self-published books, the gray-haired veterans and eager young activists at the Veterans For Peace convention in Miami this week are out to educate America on the evils of war.

The national convention began on Wednesday at the Marriott in downtown Miami and is focused on “Liberating the Americas: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean.” Highlights include speeches from author Alice Walker and filmmaker and former TV talk host Phil Donahue. The convention concludes Saturday.

VFP president Leah Bolger explained that as the United States is wrapping up wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, dancing around military engagement with Iran, and starting to pick sides in Syria, these veterans are trying to draw attention to the military mistakes of the past and the perils of fighting undeclared wars. She denounced the “war on drugs” and “war on terror” as a “huge waste of money and just a premise to intervene militarily” all over the world.

The focus on Latin America is also connected to the founding of VFP in 1985 when a group of Vietnam veterans organized to oppose the Reagan administration’s involvement in the civil wars and regime changes in the southern half of the hemisphere. The group has since protested U.S. support of Nicaraguan contras, funding of death squads in El Salvador and training of dictators in Argentina, Brazil and Chile.

In the early years of the Iraq war, the membership grew to over 4,000, but the organization has struggled to attract younger veterans returning from these conflicts. Bolger said that the soldiers of this generation “have to work so hard to heal themselves,” that they probably don’t have time for anti-war activism.

Veterans manning tables at the convention also offered literature on the prolonged detainment of Wikileaks informant Bradley Manning, the ongoing environmental impact of Agent Orange in Vietnam, and drone strikes in Pakistan. They commemorated the 65th anniversary of the atomic bomb in Nagasaki and petitioned for closing Guantánamo.

Yet with all these ideas and impassioned arguments, some participants were still frustrated with the lack of concrete action.

Peter Branson, a 78-year-old retired schoolteacher from New York City, said he wants VFP to talk to the “unconverted” who still support a bloated defense department and ambitious military campaigns.

“Most progressives want to demonstrate and carry banners and hold vigils, but our job needs to be to educate the American people,” Branson said. “We need to organize locally and act nationally.”


Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/08/10/2944539/veterans-for-peace-convene-in.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: May 10, 2012 - 5:22am

Poll: US Opposition to Afghan War Hits New High

Opposition Levels Unseen Since Vietnam War

by Jason Ditz, May 09, 2012

A new AP/Gfk poll is showing that the trend of opposition to the Afghan War continues, with an overwhelming 66% of Americans now opposed to the conflict, with only 8 percent of Americans remaining “strongly” in support of it.

The AP compared the poll to a late 1971 poll on the Vietnam War, which showed 65% of Americans opposed to continuing that war. But while the US was slowly beginning its withdrawal from Vietnam at that time, President Obama is just one week off of signing a deal to keep US troops occupying Afghanistan through 2024.

Surprisingly, the false narrative of Obama as in touch with the opposition to the war and moving to extricate America from the conflict remains at least somewhat intact, with a slight majority (53%) approving of President Obama’s handling of Afghanistan.

Still and all, every poll is securely showing a supermajority of voters in opposition to the Afghan War, and sooner or later it seems like that opposition must make the administration’s determination to escalate and extend the war is going to become a political liability.

===============================
the questions

why in f**k are we still there?

what happened to sane people speaking out for peace?

and why aren't politicians responsive to voters?


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 24, 2012 - 7:53am

 Manbird wrote:
First World Politics.
 
Nothing will get better until our politicians stop killing people.

Think peace.

Let's hope it catches on.

{#Good-vibes}

Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: Oroville, Ca
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 2:39pm

 miamizsun wrote:
conscience by who is IOZ
 
First World Politics. 
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 2:35pm

conscience by who is IOZ
mzpro5

mzpro5 Avatar

Location: Budda'spet, Hungry
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 11:36am

 kurtster wrote:

As long as we these kinds of guys around, we can have some hope.
 



Unfortunately with the insane redistricting I think Dennis will get defeated this time around.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 23, 2012 - 11:25am

 Romulus wrote:
I'm happy these two are uniting against an unjust, undeclared war on Libya. What an interview.



 
As long as we these kinds of guys around, we can have some hope.

Romulus

Romulus Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 16, 2011 - 5:18am

I'm happy these two are uniting against an unjust, undeclared war on Libya. What an interview.




beamends

beamends Avatar



Posted: Jun 16, 2011 - 5:01am

 Romulus wrote:
the first causality of war is truth.

 
"Lies get round the world while truth is still getting it's boots on".

Romulus

Romulus Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 16, 2011 - 4:51am

the first causality of war is truth.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 16, 2011 - 4:45am

f'n insane, and if you think this is ok or that we should tolerate this type of murder, time for a moral check up. we absolutely shouldn't put up with this. ignoring the law and intentionally taking innocent life isn't acceptable. somebody needs to speak up and stop this, like right now. please make a phone call.

Yet another illegal war — now in Yemen

"Contrary to false denials, the U.S., under the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner, has been bombing Yemen for the last two years, including one attack using cluster bombs that killed dozens of civilians. But what's new is that this will be a CIA drone attack program that is a massive escalation over prior bombing campaigns." Know what you're paying for when you give the government money.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 8:04pm

 buzz wrote:

chill out dude. Obama has a Nobel Peace Prize. or was that the Noble Pizza Prize?



let's see, guns or pie  {#Think} 

i'm all for obama eating pie!



miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:54pm

 oldslabsides wrote:

...and people think I'm weird.

 
you may be weird, however you clearly grasp that moral and ethical behavior is good.

you also understand that if violent governments make enough rules, we'll all eventually break one and feel the brunt of a well armed government gang.

i wish more people understood your " peaceful weirdness"

buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:46pm

 miamizsun wrote:
just how bad does all of this BS have to get before we speak up?

US says dropping bombs is not war, but guessing a computer password is
June 5, 2011

By Ethan A. Huff - Natural News

The US government sure has an interesting way of defining war these days. Just a few months after the Obama administration played word games with the public by insisting that air strikes in Libya were just "kinetic military action," not acts of war, the Pentagon has now come on the record stating that it will treat all acts of cyber-hacking against the US as "acts of war."

The announcement came on the heels of a supposed cyber-attack that occurred a few weeks ago against defense contractor Lockheed Martin. Officials say when hacking incidents like this occur in the future, retaliation in the form of reverse cyber-attacks, economic sanctions, and even "military strike" may take place.

"A response to a cyber-incident or attack on the US would not necessarily be a cyber-response," said Col. Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman. "All appropriate options would be on the table." A White House statement also said the US plans to "respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," implying that computer hackers could soon face retaliatory attacks by the US military.

So when the US decides to invade foreign nations, often times without necessary congressional approval, it is just a simple act of exerting kinetic energy. But when a computer hacker correctly guesses a password and breaches the security protocols of the US government or one of its contracted companies, this is an act of war. And so it goes in the arbitrary world of the military-industrial complex, where definitions of war are applied only when it benefits the corporate oligarchy.

In truth, this latest cyber fear mongering out of the Pentagon is just another excuse for those running the US government to widen the scope of those it considers to be terrorists and enemies of the state. And now that the announcement has been made, you can expect to hear about many more "cyber-attacks" that will predicate convenient excuses to launch new kinetic military actions against nations, groups, and perhaps even fellow American citizens.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-...

 
chill out dude. Obama has a Nobel Peace Prize. or was that the Noble Pizza Prize?
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:41pm

 miamizsun wrote:
just how bad does all of this BS have to get before we speak up?

US says dropping bombs is not war, but guessing a computer password is
June 5, 2011

By Ethan A. Huff - Natural News

The US government sure has an interesting way of defining war these days. Just a few months after the Obama administration played word games with the public by insisting that air strikes in Libya were just "kinetic military action," not acts of war, the Pentagon has now come on the record stating that it will treat all acts of cyber-hacking against the US as "acts of war."

The announcement came on the heels of a supposed cyber-attack that occurred a few weeks ago against defense contractor Lockheed Martin. Officials say when hacking incidents like this occur in the future, retaliation in the form of reverse cyber-attacks, economic sanctions, and even "military strike" may take place.

"A response to a cyber-incident or attack on the US would not necessarily be a cyber-response," said Col. Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman. "All appropriate options would be on the table." A White House statement also said the US plans to "respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," implying that computer hackers could soon face retaliatory attacks by the US military.

So when the US decides to invade foreign nations, often times without necessary congressional approval, it is just a simple act of exerting kinetic energy. But when a computer hacker correctly guesses a password and breaches the security protocols of the US government or one of its contracted companies, this is an act of war. And so it goes in the arbitrary world of the military-industrial complex, where definitions of war are applied only when it benefits the corporate oligarchy.

In truth, this latest cyber fear mongering out of the Pentagon is just another excuse for those running the US government to widen the scope of those it considers to be terrorists and enemies of the state. And now that the announcement has been made, you can expect to hear about many more "cyber-attacks" that will predicate convenient excuses to launch new kinetic military actions against nations, groups, and perhaps even fellow American citizens.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-...

 
...and people think I'm weird.


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 6, 2011 - 7:35pm

just how bad does all of this BS have to get before we speak up?

US says dropping bombs is not war, but guessing a computer password is
June 5, 2011

By Ethan A. Huff - Natural News

The US government sure has an interesting way of defining war these days. Just a few months after the Obama administration played word games with the public by insisting that air strikes in Libya were just "kinetic military action," not acts of war, the Pentagon has now come on the record stating that it will treat all acts of cyber-hacking against the US as "acts of war."

The announcement came on the heels of a supposed cyber-attack that occurred a few weeks ago against defense contractor Lockheed Martin. Officials say when hacking incidents like this occur in the future, retaliation in the form of reverse cyber-attacks, economic sanctions, and even "military strike" may take place.

"A response to a cyber-incident or attack on the US would not necessarily be a cyber-response," said Col. Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman. "All appropriate options would be on the table." A White House statement also said the US plans to "respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," implying that computer hackers could soon face retaliatory attacks by the US military.

So when the US decides to invade foreign nations, often times without necessary congressional approval, it is just a simple act of exerting kinetic energy. But when a computer hacker correctly guesses a password and breaches the security protocols of the US government or one of its contracted companies, this is an act of war. And so it goes in the arbitrary world of the military-industrial complex, where definitions of war are applied only when it benefits the corporate oligarchy.

In truth, this latest cyber fear mongering out of the Pentagon is just another excuse for those running the US government to widen the scope of those it considers to be terrorists and enemies of the state. And now that the announcement has been made, you can expect to hear about many more "cyber-attacks" that will predicate convenient excuses to launch new kinetic military actions against nations, groups, and perhaps even fellow American citizens.

Sources for this story include:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-...


thefoodoflove

thefoodoflove Avatar

Location: Sydney
Gender: Male


Posted: May 23, 2011 - 10:59am

 miamizsun wrote:
Revealing the Roots of U.S. Wars

America's denial of the roots of 9/11 is not a unique phenomenon in U.S. history, according to Ivan Eland, director of the Independent Institute's Center on Peace & Liberty. Although Osama Bin Laden told the world why he attacked-he detested specific U.S. policies in the Middle East-Americans did not want to hear this, just as they wished not to learn about U.S. policies that precipitated other security crises.

Like the citizens of many other countries, Americans believe that their government is blameless when it comes to taking up arms against other peoples: wars are simply thrust upon their government, which they absolve of any responsibility for helping to create the conditions that precipitated the crises. The pattern, Eland argues in his latest op-ed, can be found in the popular perception of the causes of the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Civil War, the Battle of Little Bighorn, the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Iran hostage crisis, and the U.S. invasion of Grenada.

Americans need to better learn their history-and to see what their government does in their name. Were they to do so, they would learn scores of unacknowledged truths, such as that the War of 1812 was instigated by congressional "war hawks" who sought to grab land from Canada, that the Mexican-American War was precipitated by President James Polk's blockade of the Rio Grande, and that the attack on Pearl Harbor resulted from the United States cutting off oil and other vital resources to Japan. "American history vindicates the old saying that ‘truth is the first casualty of war,' Eland writes, "but the passage of time should allow a republic to undertake a more honest and dispassionate examination of historical events. It rarely does, with truth being swept under the rug in favor of assuming uncaused indignities.

 

"Unprovoked' Attacks, From 1812 to 9/11 by Ivan Eland (5/11/11)

The Empire Has No Clothes: U.S. Foreign Policy Exposed, by Ivan Eland

Recarving Rushmore: Ranking the Presidents on Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty, by Ivan Eland

Partitioning for Peace: An Exit Strategy for Iraq, by Ivan Eland

 

 

 



 


Now that is refreshing i have been so tired of initial Bush lies, "they hate our freedoms" being the extent of debate in the US over the last 10 years. What happened to, " know your enemy"?
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: May 23, 2011 - 10:32am

 Beaker wrote:

You misspelled Republicans.
 


meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: May 23, 2011 - 10:31am

 Beaker wrote:

You misspelled Republicans.
 


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 20, 21, 22  Next