Israel
- haresfur - Jul 26, 2024 - 11:52pm
what the hell, miamizsun?
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:59pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:54pm
NY Times Strands
- Steely_D - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:29pm
J.D. Vance
- haresfur - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:26pm
Wordle - daily game
- Steely_D - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:25pm
Outstanding Covers
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 26, 2024 - 9:19pm
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 8:56pm
Paris Olympics
- Bill_J - Jul 26, 2024 - 7:45pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 7:21pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 7:14pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 7:12pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 6:59pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Jul 26, 2024 - 6:39pm
WHY am I so addicted to chocolate???
- kcar - Jul 26, 2024 - 6:25pm
Yellowstone is in Wyoming Meetup • Aug. 11 2007 • YEA...
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 26, 2024 - 3:59pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- DrLex - Jul 26, 2024 - 3:02pm
Things You Thought Today
- GeneP59 - Jul 26, 2024 - 2:33pm
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Jul 26, 2024 - 2:24pm
Russia
- a_geek - Jul 26, 2024 - 2:20pm
July 2024 Photo Theme - Summer
- fractalv - Jul 26, 2024 - 8:18am
Project 2025
- rgio - Jul 26, 2024 - 5:38am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Jul 26, 2024 - 5:01am
What inspires you?
- sirdroseph - Jul 26, 2024 - 4:42am
As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country
- kurtster - Jul 25, 2024 - 9:48pm
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- haresfur - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:49pm
Neoliberalism: what exactly is it?
- Steely_D - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:24pm
What makes you smile?
- Steely_D - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:18pm
Poetry
- oldviolin - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:50pm
Trump
- kcar - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:22pm
Things that piss me off
- Manbird - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:50pm
Electronic Music
- Manbird - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:45pm
your music
- Manbird - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:37pm
Joe Biden
- Beaker - Jul 25, 2024 - 5:10pm
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 25, 2024 - 11:56am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jul 25, 2024 - 10:48am
The War On You
- Isabeau - Jul 25, 2024 - 9:31am
The Obituary Page
- Antigone - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:43am
Get the Quote
- black321 - Jul 25, 2024 - 8:06am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:44am
Rhetorical questions
- oldviolin - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:36am
Message To Lucky
- oldviolin - Jul 25, 2024 - 6:22am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jul 24, 2024 - 7:56pm
2024 Elections!
- black321 - Jul 24, 2024 - 5:56pm
Song from the TV series
- Steely_D - Jul 24, 2024 - 3:49pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 10:17am
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today...
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:39am
Song stuck in your head?
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:29am
Play the Blues
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:24am
Songs with a Groove
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 9:04am
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 24, 2024 - 8:54am
RightWingNutZ
- Steely_D - Jul 24, 2024 - 8:21am
favorite love songs
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 8:21am
Jam! (why should a song stop)
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 7:49am
Amazing animals!
- thisbody - Jul 24, 2024 - 12:47am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Jul 23, 2024 - 11:18pm
Kamala Harris
- haresfur - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:38pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 23, 2024 - 7:34pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 5:32pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- Antigone - Jul 23, 2024 - 3:28pm
Animal Resistance
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Race in America
- R_P - Jul 23, 2024 - 12:15pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- geoff_morphini - Jul 23, 2024 - 11:42am
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 23, 2024 - 11:00am
Poetry Forum
- Isabeau - Jul 23, 2024 - 8:18am
Sampled
- R_P - Jul 22, 2024 - 6:51pm
Live Music
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:29pm
• • • What Makes You Happy? • • •
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:04pm
Kamala Harris
- kurtster - Jul 22, 2024 - 4:02pm
Europe
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:48pm
Got my Goat
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 3:02pm
Best wishes
- thisbody - Jul 22, 2024 - 2:20pm
Jon Stewart interview
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 21, 2024 - 3:08pm
Acoustic Guitar
- oldviolin - Jul 21, 2024 - 1:44pm
Gardeners Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 21, 2024 - 7:39am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge?
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... , 24, 25, 26 Next |
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 23, 2011 - 6:40am |
|
bokey wrote:What's with the '70's porn music background? I keep waiting for the plumber to show up so the housewife with the huge,unshaved bush on her crotch can open the door with her negligee all askew. I almost mentioned that. It definitely scored points with me.
|
|
bokey
Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 23, 2011 - 5:50am |
|
miamizsun wrote:ok, i stayed up late and got up early reading and watching some info on what may be is a very viable alternative to this situation. In a word, Thorium. (It's cheap, plentiful, way more efficient and you can't make bombs/weapons with it, which is why I believe the powers that be have worked to squelch it. ) Here's some easy to understand vids from howstuffworks. comthe political angle please feel free to comment. What's with the '70's porn music background? I keep waiting for the plumber to show up so the housewife with the huge, unshaved bush on her crotch can open the door with her negligee all askew.
|
|
beamends
|
Posted:
Mar 23, 2011 - 5:47am |
|
miamizsun wrote: ok, i stayed up late and got up early reading and watching some info on what may be is a very viable alternative to this situation.
In a word, Thorium. (It's cheap, plentiful, way more efficient and you can't make bombs/weapons with it, which is why I believe the powers that be have worked to squelch it.
Thorium looks like a less problematic solution, though I don't doubt it will have it's own problems. Inevitably there's only one way to find out In answer to the question : Saviour - with reservations.
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 23, 2011 - 5:11am |
|
|
|
Umberdog
Location: In my body. Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 22, 2011 - 8:07pm |
|
If it wasn't for all the money involved I'm pretty sure it would be illegal to threaten the public health like nuclear power has potential, not to mention what kinds of disasters it can cause. But when it comes to comfort, convenience, and money, everything else seems expendable.
I say it's a scourge.
|
|
nuggler
Location: RU Sirius ? Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 22, 2011 - 5:49pm |
|
"The nuclear bomb, does that bother you? I just want you to think big, Henry, for chrissakes. The only place where you and I disagree is with regard to the bombing. You’re so goddamned concerned about civilians, and I don’t give a damn. I don’t care." ~ Nixon to Kissinger April 25, 1972
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 22, 2011 - 4:39pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: If the claims are true (99.5% efficiency, use of spent fuel from water-cooled reactors, nuclear waste with a half-life of 200 years, enough fuel already there (i.e. no new mining) for a thousand or more years), then we don't need to wait for fusion... or at the least it will give us another 1000 years development time.. Sounds pretty good to me!
There are some pretty decent reviews on Blees book on Amazon as well. I don't know enough about this subject and I'd like to read his book, however my reading list is six books on my desk right now. Regards
|
|
MrsHobieJoe
Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 22, 2011 - 11:28am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:Georges Monbiot has really put the cat among the pigeons today with his article favoring nuclear power. Before everyone starts ditching the idea of nuclear power, take a look at this design and I'd appreciate if anyone could tell me what the drawbacks are.. (I know there must be some but the concept looks damn good to me. The danger in this is that I am neither an engineer nor a physicist so I'm not really qualified to judge) Yes, I read the article in the Guardian today. My only comment is about the title of the thread- why does it have to be "saviour or scourge?"- this isn't the X factor. It's a useful tool but not without some significant drawbacks.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 22, 2011 - 11:15am |
|
Georges Monbiot has really put the cat among the pigeons today with his article favoring nuclear power. Before everyone starts ditching the idea of nuclear power, take a look at this design and I'd appreciate if anyone could tell me what the drawbacks are.. (I know there must be some but the concept looks damn good to me. The danger in this is that I am neither an engineer nor a physicist so I'm not really qualified to judge)
|
|
(former member)
Location: hotel in Las Vegas Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 20, 2011 - 3:04pm |
|
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:10pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: huge manatees all over the place?
snerk.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:09pm |
|
islander wrote: one word: Balloons.
huge manatees all over the place?
|
|
islander
Location: West coast somewhere Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 9:49pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:The other thing that excites me about some of these GenIV designs is that they can be used to produce hydrogen thermochemically in addition to the electricity they produce. I know hydrogen has major problems all of its own ( transport, storage, etc.) but at least it's clean. one word: Balloons.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 9:29pm |
|
The other thing that excites me about some of these GenIV designs is that they can be used to produce hydrogen thermochemically in addition to the electricity they produce. I know hydrogen has major problems all of its own (transport, storage, etc.) but at least it's clean.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 8:06pm |
|
cptbuz wrote:I hate getting involved in these discussions but...
I have been inspecting nuke plants for over 20 years, to me they are a safe and viable energy option. One of the big concerns that people bring up is what to do about the radiological waste. By far the majority (volume-wise) of radioactive waste produced at a nuke plant is very low level contaminated trash. The good news is that over the past 20 years the amount of contaminated trash created at nuke plants has dropped significantly through better planning, the reuse of materials/tools etc. in contaminated areas. The source of high level waste is spent fuel. Sites have spent fuel storage pools, but they are fast filling up (due to operating license extentions). Dry cask storage, an above ground shielded storage 'pod', allows for safe on-site storage of spent fuel and is a system used at many sites already. Dry cask storage has created a public uproar at some sites that could potentially cause a plant to shutdown prior to the end of its licensing.
Many people argue that wind and solar are "green" energy sources while nuke power, because of the waste and potential of contamination, should not be considered 'green'. What these arguements don't consider is the climate damage created in the manufacture of items such as fiberglass for fan blades of a wind farm, or manufacture of the panels for solar collectors. Yes, the concrete and steel used in the manufacture of a nuke plant adds a size or two to the ol' carbon foot print too, but unlike wind and solar farms, the concrete structures of a nuke plant do not need to be routinely replaced.
Finally, ground has been broken in the U.S. for a new nuke plant @ the Vogtle site in Georgia. The hope is for the new unit (one of 7 planned in the US) to be on the grid by 2017...and one last thing, nuclear power plants are not run by baffoons as depicted in movies like 'China System', or (UGH!) the made for TV abomination 'Atomic Twister'.
I'm glad you joined the discussion cptbuz! What is your opinion on fast breeders? Are their claims realistic? They seem to have pretty good fail-safes built into them and the waste has a half-life of 200 years (or low level for hundreds of thousands but so low it's not a major issue). I don't know why we are wringing our hands looking for alternative energy sources to replace fossil fuels when this technology is just sitting there unused.
|
|
geoff_morphini
Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 8:44am |
|
Beaker wrote:Buffoons China Syndrome I'm a nuclear inspector Jim, not a proofreader!
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 8:40am |
|
cptbuz wrote:I hate getting involved in these discussions but...
I have been inspecting nuke plants for over 20 years,
Nice to hear from someone who is intimately involved with existing facilities. Thank you.
|
|
cptbuz
Location: Sacramento CA Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 8:38am |
|
Beaker wrote:Buffoons China Syndrome damn decaf!
|
|
cptbuz
Location: Sacramento CA Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 8:22am |
|
I hate getting involved in these discussions but...
I have been inspecting nuke plants for over 20 years, to me they are a safe and viable energy option. One of the big concerns that people bring up is what to do about the radiological waste. By far the majority (volume-wise) of radioactive waste produced at a nuke plant is very low level contaminated trash. The good news is that over the past 20 years the amount of contaminated trash created at nuke plants has dropped significantly through better planning, the reuse of materials/tools etc. in contaminated areas. The source of high level waste is spent fuel. Sites have spent fuel storage pools, but they are fast filling up (due to operating license extentions). Dry cask storage, an above ground shielded storage 'pod', allows for safe on-site storage of spent fuel and is a system used at many sites already. Dry cask storage has created a public uproar at some sites that could potentially cause a plant to shutdown prior to the end of its licensing.
Many people argue that wind and solar are "green" energy sources while nuke power, because of the waste and potential of contamination, should not be considered 'green'. What these arguements don't consider is the climate damage created in the manufacture of items such as fiberglass for fan blades of a wind farm, or manufacture of the panels for solar collectors. Yes, the concrete and steel used in the manufacture of a nuke plant adds a size or two to the ol' carbon foot print too, but unlike wind and solar farms, the concrete structures of a nuke plant do not need to be routinely replaced.
Finally, ground has been broken in the U.S. for a new nuke plant @ the Vogtle site in Georgia. The hope is for the new unit (one of 7 planned in the US) to be on the grid by 2017...and one last thing, nuclear power plants are not run by baffoons as depicted in movies like 'China System', or (UGH!) the made for TV abomination 'Atomic Twister'.
|
|
laozilover
Location: K Town (Kenosha, Wisconsin) Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 4:15am |
|
The discussion so far seems pretty reasonable. Is this RP??? I read Beaker's link and the Wikipedia article on the IFR. Looks like the IFR wins on points. Nice to see both PEAK OIL and Global Warming taken seriously, even tacitly.
Thanks for the topic, Beaker.
|
|
|