[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Name My Band - oldviolin - Dec 8, 2021 - 7:18am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Dec 8, 2021 - 6:54am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Dec 8, 2021 - 6:46am
 
Coffee - miamizsun - Dec 8, 2021 - 6:45am
 
Germany - Red_Dragon - Dec 8, 2021 - 5:56am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Coaxial - Dec 8, 2021 - 5:21am
 
Things You Thought Today - Coaxial - Dec 8, 2021 - 5:18am
 
Irish Traditional - sunybuny - Dec 8, 2021 - 5:13am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Dec 8, 2021 - 5:06am
 
Alexa/Echo?Echo Plus stereo streaming - Milhouse - Dec 8, 2021 - 3:24am
 
Apple Computer - KurtfromLaQuinta - Dec 7, 2021 - 8:02pm
 
COVID-19 - oldviolin - Dec 7, 2021 - 3:18pm
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Dec 7, 2021 - 2:56pm
 
Alternative to Travis Scott CD - miamizsun - Dec 7, 2021 - 2:38pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Dec 7, 2021 - 1:50pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - GeneP59 - Dec 7, 2021 - 11:01am
 
Skeptix - geoff_morphini - Dec 7, 2021 - 10:46am
 
Supreme Court Rulings - steeler - Dec 7, 2021 - 10:41am
 
Democratic Party - westslope - Dec 7, 2021 - 10:30am
 
Saudi Arabia - Red_Dragon - Dec 7, 2021 - 10:27am
 
Future of Human Race (in 500 years) - kurtster - Dec 7, 2021 - 8:44am
 
What did you have for dinner? - oldviolin - Dec 7, 2021 - 6:31am
 
TV shows you watch - R_P - Dec 6, 2021 - 11:11pm
 
Republican Party - R_P - Dec 6, 2021 - 3:43pm
 
Blast from the past - miamizsun - Dec 6, 2021 - 3:21pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Dec 6, 2021 - 2:47pm
 
Webcomics? ... Webcomics! Webcomics! - Proclivities - Dec 6, 2021 - 12:17pm
 
Race in America - westslope - Dec 6, 2021 - 12:10pm
 
Timing Off? - orrinc - Dec 6, 2021 - 11:17am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - oldviolin - Dec 6, 2021 - 10:20am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Ohmsen - Dec 6, 2021 - 10:15am
 
What Did You Have For Breakfast? - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 6, 2021 - 10:01am
 
Robots - Red_Dragon - Dec 6, 2021 - 9:59am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Dec 6, 2021 - 9:44am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Dec 6, 2021 - 8:25am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Dec 6, 2021 - 7:52am
 
The Obituary Page - yuel - Dec 6, 2021 - 7:52am
 
Environment - Red_Dragon - Dec 6, 2021 - 7:14am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Dec 6, 2021 - 5:55am
 
Floyd forum - Ohmsen - Dec 6, 2021 - 1:52am
 
Buddy's Haven - KurtfromLaQuinta - Dec 5, 2021 - 6:10pm
 
Joe Biden - KurtfromLaQuinta - Dec 5, 2021 - 6:07pm
 
short track after short jingle - KurtfromLaQuinta - Dec 5, 2021 - 6:04pm
 
Music documentaries - Manbird - Dec 5, 2021 - 5:07pm
 
Trump - R_P - Dec 5, 2021 - 11:06am
 
Fix my dogma - Coaxial - Dec 5, 2021 - 8:28am
 
What is the meaning of this? - oldviolin - Dec 5, 2021 - 8:13am
 
Fox Spews - R_P - Dec 4, 2021 - 1:03pm
 
World Music - Ohmsen - Dec 4, 2021 - 11:41am
 
Breaking News - westslope - Dec 4, 2021 - 11:24am
 
Mens Health - miamizsun - Dec 4, 2021 - 10:51am
 
RP Tapes! - miamizsun - Dec 4, 2021 - 10:36am
 
Nice set Bill.... - miamizsun - Dec 4, 2021 - 6:44am
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - KurtfromLaQuinta - Dec 3, 2021 - 7:58pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - Manbird - Dec 3, 2021 - 3:59pm
 
Back to the 60's - R_P - Dec 3, 2021 - 2:33pm
 
Automotive Lust - R_P - Dec 3, 2021 - 1:20pm
 
• • • Things Magicians Exclaim • • •  - Manbird - Dec 3, 2021 - 12:30pm
 
This Film is not yet Rated - Proclivities - Dec 3, 2021 - 12:02pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - GeneP59 - Dec 3, 2021 - 9:32am
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Dec 3, 2021 - 9:11am
 
Play the Blues - rhahl - Dec 3, 2021 - 6:41am
 
2020 Elections - Red_Dragon - Dec 3, 2021 - 5:53am
 
RightWingNutZ - Manbird - Dec 2, 2021 - 9:02pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Dec 2, 2021 - 3:06pm
 
New Music - black321 - Dec 2, 2021 - 10:48am
 
The RANT Forum - Red_Dragon - Dec 2, 2021 - 6:05am
 
Things that are just WRONG - Manbird - Dec 1, 2021 - 6:13pm
 
This Wonderfully Weird World - Red_Dragon - Dec 1, 2021 - 4:01pm
 
Damn Dinosaurs! - R_P - Dec 1, 2021 - 9:42am
 
Happy Thanksgiving! - GeneP59 - Dec 1, 2021 - 8:46am
 
Bear! - Ohmsen - Dec 1, 2021 - 6:50am
 
That's good advice - Proclivities - Dec 1, 2021 - 6:24am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Nov 30, 2021 - 9:20pm
 
Sunrise, Sunset - Coaxial - Nov 30, 2021 - 7:30pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Climate Change Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 111, 112, 113, 114  Next
Post to this Topic
dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 4:01pm

 miamizsun wrote:
First, I'd like to see this "de-politicized", most politicians are people we pay to lie to us. Politicians(both parties) should be out of this altogether. Opposing something because of another party's take on it makes zero sense.

I like others here want to see the evidence, all of it, and put it through the rigors. I'm also more concerned with pollution than climate change, we can deal with water better/easier than poison.

I'm wondering what caused the planet to go through its cycles before we were here(short of a cataclysmic event). We see glacial striations all over the place, glaciers receding and forming thousands of years ago, yet we weren't using fossil fuels to any extent then.

I tend to think that it is mostly caused by the sun(in all of its flux) and man plays a minor part, much less than hyped. Lots of articles like this which suggest warming coinciding between mars and earth for example, are solar induced phenomena.(this is an older article, but I think that this type of data may gaining traction)

"Man-made greenhouse warming has made a small contribution to the warming seen on Earth in recent years, but it cannot compete with the increase in solar irradiance," Abdussamatov said.

It is difficult to say.

Regards

 
Hi Jeff!

No, not all all difficult to say. No one doubts that cycles in solar radiation occur, and that they have affected terrestrial climate in the past. But it takes many thousands of years for such variations in solar radiation or orbital attitude to achieve significant change. The relative speed of the warming points towards human causality. It's happening too quickly to be natural.

Read the Scientific American article, and its debunking of the solar radiation hypothesis:

"Astronomical phenomena are obvious natural factors to consider when trying to understand climate, particularly the brightness of the sun and details of the earth's orbit, because those seem to have been major drivers of the ice ages and other climate changes before the rise of industrial civilization. Climatologists, therefore, do take them into account in their models. But in defiance of the naysayers who want to chalk the recent warming up to natural cycles, there is insufficient evidence that enough extra solar energy is reaching our planet to account for the observed rise in global temperatures.

"The IPCC notes that between 1750 and 2005, the radiative forcing from the sun increased by 0.12 watts/square-meter-less than a tenth of the net forcings from human activities (1.6 W/m2). The largest uncertainty in that comparison comes from the estimated effects of aerosols in the atmosphere, which can variously shade the earth or warm it. Even granting the maximum uncertainties to these estimates, however, the increase in human influence on climate exceeds that of any solar variation."




miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 3:50pm

First, I'd like to see this "de-politicized", most politicians are people we pay to lie to us. Politicians(both parties) should be out of this altogether. Opposing something because of another party's take on it makes zero sense.

I like others here want to see the evidence, all of it, and put it through the rigors. I'm also more concerned with pollution than climate change, we can deal with water better/easier than poison.

I'm wondering what caused the planet to go through its cycles before we were here(short of a cataclysmic event). We see glacial striations all over the place, glaciers receding and forming thousands of years ago, yet we weren't using fossil fuels to any extent then.

I tend to think that it is mostly caused by the sun(in all of its flux) and man plays a minor part, much less than hyped. Lots of articles like this which suggest warming coinciding between mars and earth for example, are solar induced phenomena.(this is an older article, but I think that this type of data may gaining traction)

"Man-made greenhouse warming has made a small contribution to the warming seen on Earth in recent years, but it cannot compete with the increase in solar irradiance," Abdussamatov said.

It is difficult to say.

Regards

I thought this was good.

Climate Change - the Scientific Debate


Welly

Welly Avatar

Location: Lotusland
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 12:02pm

Interesting!


oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 11:15am

 dionysius wrote:


What does this even mean?

 

Doesn't mean anything, Mark. Not a thing...I use big words to make myself sound smart. I said it was my opinion, but what do I know. Take it or leave it.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 11:14am

 dionysius wrote:


The two are intimately related in a whole complex of bad human behaviors that damage the natural world. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere is itself a form of pollution that (for instance) increases the acidity of the oceans, dooming coral reefs and associated ecosystems. Deforestation is not itself pollution, but is the destruction of (a) habitat for many, many animal and plant species, and (b) one of our main carbon sinks, the destruction of which makes a bad problem worse. *Etc., etc.* History will not judge us kindly if we do not act soon and act decisively to curb our bad habits.

 
Everyone wants simple answers to complex questions. We are now paying for hundreds of years of bad behavior, financially, ecologically, educationally. Whatever the causes, we must stop our bad behavior anyway, if we want anything left for our grandchildren.

dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 11:12am

 oldviolin wrote:

My point was / is, that if we can address the realities of pollution in general, then the arguable pretensions of the effects of human attributes to climate change will be addressed. My opinion.

"Here we go round the prickly pear..."
 

What does this even mean?
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 11:11am

 dionysius wrote:


The two are intimately related in a whole complex of bad human behaviors that damage the natural world. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere is itself a form of pollution that (for instance) increases the acidity of the oceans, dooming coral reefs and associated ecosystems. Deforestation is not itself pollution, but is the destruction of (a) habitat for many, many animal and plant species, and (b) one of our main carbon sinks, the destruction of which makes a bad problem worse. *Etc., etc.* History will not judge us kindly if we do not act soon and act decisively to curb our bad habits.

 
My point was / is, that if we can address the realities of pollution in general, then the arguable pretensions of the effects of human attributes to climate change will be addressed. My opinion.

"Here we go round the prickly pear..."

hobiejoe

hobiejoe Avatar

Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light.
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:59am

 dionysius wrote:
We must do something, after all, to help save the gharial.



 
{#Idea} ! Oh, of course......{#Good-vibes}
Welly

Welly Avatar

Location: Lotusland
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:55am

 dionysius wrote: 
{#Clap}

dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:54am

We must do something, after all, to help save the gharial.


dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:50am

 oldviolin wrote:
My point was / is, that if we can address the realities of pollution in general, then the arguable pretensions of the effects of human attributes to climate change will be addressed. My opinion.
 

The two are intimately related in a whole complex of bad human behaviors that damage the natural world. Increased CO2 in the atmosphere is itself a form of pollution that (for instance) increases the acidity of the oceans, dooming coral reefs and associated ecosystems. Deforestation is not itself pollution, but is the destruction of (a) habitat for many, many animal and plant species, and (b) one of our main carbon sinks, the destruction of which makes a bad problem worse. *Etc., etc.* History will not judge us kindly if we do not act soon and act decisively to curb our bad habits.


Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: Owl Creek Bridge
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:49am

"   c   l   i   m   a   t   e       i   s       g   e   t   t   i   n   g       w   a   r   m   e   r   "


oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:38am

My point was / is, that if we can address the realities of pollution in general, then the arguable pretensions of the effects of human attributes to climate change will be addressed. My opinion.

dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:34am

 oldviolin wrote:

Pretty cut and dried. I honor your opinion. You must be emersed in the know...


 

I honor the opinions of the scientists who make their lives' work the study of climate. The overwhelming majority of them agree on anthropogenic climate change. If you're going to disagree with this majority, you had better bring better arguments than those dealt with in the Scientific American article. Read the article!
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:29am

 dionysius wrote:


There is no lack of consensus, really, The denial game is to manufacture one. There is no equivalence between the two "sides" in this matter—one is right and the other simply wrong.

 
Pretty cut and dried. I honor your opinion. You must be emersed in the know...



dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:28am

 oldviolin wrote:

The extreme politics played with lack of consensus among dissenting opinions.

 

There is no lack of consensus, really, The denial game is to manufacture a seeming lack of consensus. There is no equivalence between the two "sides" in this matter—one is right and the other simply wrong.


oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:26am

 dionysius wrote:


What do you base your opinion on?

 
The extreme politics played with lack of consensus among dissenting opinions.


dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:22am

 oldviolin wrote:
Bogus
Pollution however- very much human and serious

IMO of course...

 

What do you base your opinion on?
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:21am

Bogus
Pollution however- very much human and serious

IMO of course...
dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 30, 2009 - 10:20am

From Scientific American, November 30th, 2009

Seven Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense

Evidence for human interference with Earth's climate continues to accumulate


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 111, 112, 113, 114  Next