[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

2020 Elections - R_P - Sep 30, 2020 - 9:49pm
 
Trump Lies - haresfur - Sep 30, 2020 - 9:46pm
 
Bluesound Sound Dropouts - BillG - Sep 30, 2020 - 6:27pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Sep 30, 2020 - 5:54pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Sep 30, 2020 - 5:27pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Sep 30, 2020 - 4:35pm
 
New Music - Lazy8 - Sep 30, 2020 - 1:47pm
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - oldviolin - Sep 30, 2020 - 12:30pm
 
Fox Spews - Red_Dragon - Sep 30, 2020 - 11:00am
 
Name My Band - jre_1 - Sep 30, 2020 - 9:52am
 
Problems with RP on BluOS in the UK - jre_1 - Sep 30, 2020 - 9:47am
 
Nigeria - cc_rider - Sep 30, 2020 - 9:45am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 30, 2020 - 8:53am
 
American Justice - Red_Dragon - Sep 30, 2020 - 7:26am
 
What Did You Do Today? - miamizsun - Sep 30, 2020 - 6:46am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - helenofjoy - Sep 30, 2020 - 6:16am
 
FLAC Streaming - ntalwalkar - Sep 30, 2020 - 6:13am
 
p4jkafla's personal thread because she is mean or kicks p... - haresfur - Sep 30, 2020 - 3:13am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 29, 2020 - 8:41pm
 
Amazing animals! - kcar - Sep 29, 2020 - 8:00pm
 
Music Videos - Steely_D - Sep 29, 2020 - 7:58pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - Red_Dragon - Sep 29, 2020 - 6:37pm
 
Media Bias - Ohmsen - Sep 29, 2020 - 5:12pm
 
Breaking News - Steely_D - Sep 29, 2020 - 4:54pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - GeneP59 - Sep 29, 2020 - 4:37pm
 
Business as Usual - R_P - Sep 29, 2020 - 1:25pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 29, 2020 - 1:16pm
 
Coffee - Steely_D - Sep 29, 2020 - 1:09pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - miamizsun - Sep 29, 2020 - 12:20pm
 
Modern - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 29, 2020 - 11:02am
 
It's the economy stupid. - rgio - Sep 29, 2020 - 9:18am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Sep 29, 2020 - 8:56am
 
RP App for Android - bevgerry - Sep 29, 2020 - 8:29am
 
Race in America - cc_rider - Sep 29, 2020 - 8:16am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Sep 29, 2020 - 7:46am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Sep 29, 2020 - 5:17am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Sep 28, 2020 - 11:58pm
 
Crazy conspiracy theories - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 28, 2020 - 6:38pm
 
Dial 1 for English - kcar - Sep 28, 2020 - 4:58pm
 
Supreme Court: Who's Next? - Steely_D - Sep 28, 2020 - 3:55pm
 
Things You Thought Today - ScottN - Sep 28, 2020 - 1:47pm
 
FLAC via TuneIn - Steely_D - Sep 28, 2020 - 11:35am
 
China - westslope - Sep 28, 2020 - 11:22am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Sep 28, 2020 - 3:06am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Sep 27, 2020 - 8:02pm
 
The American Dream - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2020 - 4:02pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:50pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - haresfur - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:33pm
 
Classical Music - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 12:14pm
 
Twitter's finest moment - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2020 - 11:23am
 
KUDOS for BillG - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2020 - 9:04am
 
What are you reading now? - rhahl - Sep 27, 2020 - 7:48am
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Sep 26, 2020 - 4:27pm
 
Khruangbin - Red_Dragon - Sep 26, 2020 - 3:36pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Sep 26, 2020 - 2:19pm
 
How's the weather? - westslope - Sep 26, 2020 - 7:20am
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - Red_Dragon - Sep 25, 2020 - 1:17pm
 
Integration of RP app with Apple Music playlists - BillG - Sep 25, 2020 - 12:14pm
 
Canada - westslope - Sep 25, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Sep 25, 2020 - 10:58am
 
This is Odd, Gross and a good excuse to be late for work - miamizsun - Sep 25, 2020 - 10:08am
 
Drop the Puck! NHL Lockout Ends! - sunybuny - Sep 25, 2020 - 5:35am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 24, 2020 - 4:32pm
 
Animal Resistance - R_P - Sep 24, 2020 - 4:13pm
 
Language - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:12am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - miamizsun - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:59am
 
Film & Video Production - rgio - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:11am
 
Quotes: Your Favorite Comedians - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:07am
 
Questions. - whatshisname - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:10pm
 
Your favourite conspiracy theory? - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:56pm
 
*** PUNS *** ASTRONOMY - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:24pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:21pm
 
how do you feel right now? - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
WikiLeaks - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:58am
 
Favorite Quotes - Coaxial - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:39am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Climate Change Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 87, 88, 89 ... 103, 104, 105  Next
Post to this Topic
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 17, 2009 - 8:49am

 miamizsun wrote:
OK, I know Stossel is considered controversial, so let's edit him out of the clip.

What about the rest of the material?

The scientists in the film that left the IPCC?

And now we see the IPCC for what it is.

Are you OK with George Carlin? (btw, I don't agree with everything he says)

This is not a Battle of Celebrities.

Science does not work on argument by authority, it works on argument by evidence. John Stossel saying outrageous things doesn't make him wrong any more than Michael Mann faking tree ring data makes him wrong.

He makes one good point in particular (and if you're concerned that John Stossel isn't a climate scientist and isn't qualified to make such an observation, unwind your knickers—it isn't his observation, he's just reporting it): historical CO2 levels in the atmosphere really do lag temperature rises. This isn't even controversial among climate scientists who support the anthropogenic climate change model.

Anyone who works with physical laws can tell you that correlation is not causation. Yes, CO2 levels correlate with temperature fluctuations...but the temperature changes first. That means that the temperature changes caused the CO2 changes (by, for instance, warming the oceans, reducing their ability to hold dissolved gasses) rather than the other way around. So when Al Gore points to CO2 levels and says they are high in comparison to recent geological history (which is true) and says the earth's average temperature is rising (which is also true) and concludes that the CO2 caused the temperature rise he might well be wrong. Thousands of years of climate data would say he is. And if that historical trend has reversed (ie CO2 levels now lead temperature changes) he may still be wrong, at least in part.

CO2 and methane levels in the atmosphere have been rising for the last 20,000 years (along with the temperature, lagging dutifully behind by 500 years or so) without our help.The CO2 level has spiked lately due to humans burning fossil fuels on top of an underlying natural rising trend in temperature. If the humans were gone and that carbon stayed in the ground the temperature and greenhouse gas levels would probably still be rising, but the historical connection between CO2 levels and global mean temperatures has been broken—the greenhouse gasses are rising faster than temperatures now, and we can't use greenhouse gas levels to estimate or predict temperatures. The historical data is fascinating, but we're not on that curve anymore.

None of this means that additional CO2 provided by jets flying to Copenhagen isn't contributing to the earth warming up. It probably is, but we can't (honestly) say we know how much. What we can say is that the earth's climate history isn't evidence for it. Pointing this out is not evil, it gets us closer to the truth.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 2:45pm

 islander wrote:


I'm open to other viewpoints, but John Stossel? Come on.


 
OK, I know Stossel is considered controversial, so let's edit him out of the clip.

What about the rest of the material?

The scientists in the film that left the IPCC?

And now we see the IPCC for what it is.

Are you OK with George Carlin? (btw, I don't agree with everything he says)



islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 12:51pm

 miamizsun wrote:
In a video that's fairly current, one of RP's favorites, John Stossel makes a few points.



 

I'm open to other viewpoints, but John Stossel? Come on.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3418

ABC News free-market evangelist John Stossel is no stranger to distorting facts and attacking environmentalists for their "earth worship" (4/28/00), so it's no surprise that he would be among the corporate media's most outspoken global warming deniers.

Stossel's 2001 special Tampering With Nature (6/29/01) tried to argue that climate skeptics are excluded from media discussions of the issue despite their impressive scientific credentials-not to mention their sheer numbers.
In contrast to environmentalist "preachers of doom and gloom," Stossel portrayed the marginal skeptics' movement as the majority: "You may have heard that 1,600 scientists signed a letter warning of ‘devastating consequences,'" Stossel reported. "But I bet you hadn't heard that 17,000 scientists signed a petition saying there's ‘no convincing evidence' that greenhouse gases will disrupt the Earth's climate."

While the implication is impressive-10 times as many scientists question global warming-what Stossel didn't tell ABC viewers were the significant qualitative differences between the two petitions. The first petition was circulated by the well-respected Union of Concerned Scientists and signed by 110 Nobel laureates; the second petition was a response organized by industry-affiliated groups that included dentists, nutritionists and others with no expertise in climatology; the only alleged requirement for signing on was a bachelor's degree in science. For a time, the screening process was so lax that the list included a number of gag names, like Ginger Spice and Michael J. Fox, added by environmentalists (AP, 5/1/98).



miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 6:24am

In a video that's fairly current, one of RP's favorites, John Stossel makes a few points.


MrsHobieJoe

MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 5:15am

A photo gallery from the Daily Telegraph illustrating some of the countries most at threat from climate change.  I woud have to say that the Bangladesh one is the one I have chosen to copy below as it is a classic example of a low lying country with a densely settled and poor population which will be massively affected by the projected changes.  Is anyone going to offer settlement for 30m Bangladeshis in their countries?  Some of the examples in the gallery are being used for visual purposes rather than because they are the best examples however it does help to remind ouselves about the actual impact rather than saying "well the world has experienced large temperature shifts before and coped"- that was a very different world.  The impact this time on marginal populations will be terrible.

An aerial view of clouds covering flooded Chandpur 170km (106 miles) southeast of the Bangladeshi capital Dhaka

rachlan

rachlan Avatar

Location: nyc
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 2:33am

 HazzeSwede wrote:
"The largest part of the world's oil consumption is spent on cooling, and not heating, which is a common misconception"
{#Whisper}  Have you heard about "smart windows" ?
 
it is cool, especially because of what you said.   it annoys me though that they spent so much time saying :

"In reverse, it's an advantage to be able to choose to let in the sun light and heat on cold days."  .... as if there was some kind of new technology presented for this.  they don't mean more heat will be let in, they just mean the windows adjust.  i guess it is more the writers fault.   not the technology.   i guess i am in a mood, being up at 5:30 in the morning, maybe that is why i can't sleep.

HazzeSwede

HazzeSwede Avatar

Location: Hammerdal
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 1:35am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Very cool!
  {#Yes}  Cool, being the operative word here !  {#Cool}


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 1:29am

 HazzeSwede wrote:
"The largest part of the world's oil consumption is spent on cooling, and not heating, which is a common misconception"
{#Whisper}  Have you heard about "smart windows" ?
 
Very cool!

HazzeSwede

HazzeSwede Avatar

Location: Hammerdal
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 16, 2009 - 1:19am

"The largest part of the world's oil consumption is spent on cooling, and not heating, which is a common misconception"
{#Whisper}  Have you heard about "smart windows" ?

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 4:13pm

 hobiejoe wrote:
 
I didn't say I liked the IMF or World Bank. At all. They're a band aid to make the western neo-liberal economies look as if they care, and a sharp stick to prod developing nations in the "right" direction, ie here's some money, now open your markets to these nice corporations, they'll look after your best interests. And don't you worry your pretty heads about these natural mineral, agricultural and fuel resources, we'll pay you with this nice little bag of money, take away those muddy old diamonds, ores and coffee beans and do the nasty old business of transforming their value through a little bit of processing ourselves.
 

Sheesh, sorry. Must've got out of the wrong side of bed this morning. Time for bed.
 
 
Hey I'm ok, if you're ok.

We're just having a conversation, that's all.

All I'm saying is that the way this deal is setup the WB will be scamming all involved.

See you tomorrow {#Wave}
hobiejoe

hobiejoe Avatar

Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light.
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 4:03pm

 miamizsun wrote:

These people are criminal.

I'd simply suggest that you and others investigate the World Bank and IMF.

If after you have done that and still put your blessing on them, I'd be surprised.

Regards

World Bank and IMF.

Confessions of an Economic Hitman.

  
I didn't say I liked the IMF or World Bank. At all. They're a band aid to make the western neo-liberal economies look as if they care, and a sharp stick to prod developing nations in the "right" direction, ie here's some money, now open your markets to these nice corporations, they'll look after your best interests. And don't you worry your pretty heads about these natural mineral, agricultural and fuel resources, we'll pay you with this nice little bag of money, take away those muddy old diamonds, ores and coffee beans and do the nasty old business of transforming their value through a little bit of processing ourselves.
 

Sheesh, sorry. Must've got out of the wrong side of bed this morning. Time for bed.
 

Welly

Welly Avatar

Location: Lotusland
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 4:02pm

 MrsHobieJoe wrote:
Oh- just saw this.  Thanks peeps.  Sorry if I went a bit school marm.

 
{#Silenced} I'm still too scared to respond.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 3:50pm

 hobiejoe wrote:

 
Oh good grief. On one hand you've got Lord (hereditary - all he had to do to get called "Lord" was to survive child-birth) Monckton spouting his swivel-eyed Hitler lunacies and on the other the Guardian pointing out that there are suggestions that responsibility for climate control should be moved from the UN to that hot-bed of Marxist-Leninism The World Bank.
 
The figure of 2% is, I understand, to be the higher estimated cost to global turnover (ie all of us) of beating climate change, which, compared to the projected costs of carrying on regardless sounds quite reasonable.
 
The Tobin tax - the tax that may be levied on internatonal financial transactions, not industrial or trade, is the earth shatteringly punitative rate of 0.05%. The fact that such a low rate could generate such huge incomes also highlights the insane amounts of electronic cash being shovelled around the system by the banks for very little social benefit yet generating colossal amounts of comission - you can bet your arse that each time a dealer passes on the dough a shitload more than 0.05% sticks on his fingers. Use this to fund research and development into carbon reducing technologies and you're nuturing and expanding a huge new industry, saving the planet and getting the pinstriped wankers on Wall Street and in the City of London to a) atone for getting us into this horrible financial mess after having money shovelled down their throats for the last thirty years and b) start paying their way in society from now on.
 
 

 
*edit* Well, at least that made me feel better.
 


 
These people are criminal.

I'd simply suggest that you and others investigate the World Bank and IMF.

If after you have done that and still put your blessing on them, I'd be surprised.

Regards

World Bank and IMF.

Confessions of an Economic Hitman.


MrsHobieJoe

MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 3:44pm

Funny that HJ, Callum and I all have the same view on Christopher Monckton although we all come from different political standpoints.  Some things are just universal.

The problem is that anything quoting him puts up an immediate "that idiot" flag in my mind that kind of loses the rest of the information.

edit- for those of you who think that I have the same political views as HJ- he didn't speak to me for a fornight in May after the last local elections and for the European parliament- again- totally different voting.


Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: Oroville, Ca
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 3:35pm

on sean's big cranium
hobiejoe

hobiejoe Avatar

Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light.
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 3:32pm

 miamizsun wrote:

Please follow the link, I can't stress it enough.

This carbon tax, and make no mistake, this is the crux of the biscuit, is huge, and my feeling is that once enacted, it won't be reversed.

{#Arrow}We can't put the shit back in the horse on this one. {#Arrowl}

Bait and Switch and Who Really Gets the Dough

Additional skepticism arose last week when it was revealed by Britain's Lord Christopher Monckton warned that the secretive draft version of the Copenhagen climate change treaty represents a global government power grab on an "unimaginable scale," and mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 percent levies on both GDP and every international financial transaction.

The London Guardian states things a bit more strongly, reporting;

"The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank."

So it now appears that this massive new system of global taxation will be paid not to the UN, as originally sold , but directly into the coffers of the World Bank.

This has all the appearances of being the funding mechanism of a World Government run by Banks - not elected and not accountable to anyone.

Perhaps none of us should be surprised. Bankers do claim they are doing "god's work", don't they?



 
 
Oh good grief. On one hand you've got Lord (hereditary - all he had to do to get called "Lord" was to survive child-birth) Monckton spouting his swivel-eyed Hitler lunacies and on the other the Guardian pointing out that there are suggestions that responsibility for climate control should be moved from the UN to that hot-bed of Marxist-Leninism The World Bank.
 
The figure of 2% is, I understand, to be the higher estimated cost to global turnover (ie all of us) of beating climate change, which, compared to the projected costs of carrying on regardless sounds quite reasonable.
 
The Tobin tax - the tax that may be levied on internatonal financial transactions, not industrial or trade, is the earth shatteringly punitative rate of 0.05%. The fact that such a low rate could generate such huge incomes also highlights the insane amounts of electronic cash being shovelled around the system by the banks for very little social benefit yet generating colossal amounts of comission - you can bet your arse that each time a dealer passes on the dough a shitload more than 0.05% sticks on his fingers. Use this to fund research and development into carbon reducing technologies and you're nuturing and expanding a huge new industry, saving the planet and getting the pinstriped wankers on Wall Street and in the City of London to a) atone for getting us into this horrible financial mess after having money shovelled down their throats for the last thirty years and b) start paying their way in society from now on.
 
 

 
*edit* Well, at least that made me feel better.
 



zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 2:35pm

 miamizsun wrote:

Please follow the link, I can't stress it enough.

This carbon tax, and make no mistake, this is the crux of the biscuit, is huge, and my feeling is that once enacted, it won't be reversed.

{#Arrow}We can't put the shit back in the horse on this one. {#Arrowl}

Bait and Switch and Who Really Gets the Dough

Additional skepticism arose last week when it was revealed by Britain's Lord Christopher Monckton warned that the secretive draft version of the Copenhagen climate change treaty represents a global government power grab on an "unimaginable scale," and mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 percent levies on both GDP and every international financial transaction.

The London Guardian states things a bit more strongly, reporting;

"The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank."

So it now appears that this massive new system of global taxation will be paid not to the UN, as originally sold , but directly into the coffers of the World Bank.

This has all the appearances of being the funding mechanism of a World Government run by Banks - not elected and not accountable to anyone.

Perhaps none of us should be surprised. Bankers do claim they are doing "god's work", don't they?



 
It's always about controlling the people and the money. Sad.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 1:37pm

 MrsHobieJoe wrote:


Well I understood (and maybe I am wrong) that Copenhagen is a political summit to succeed Kyoto and sort out the actions to respond to the scientific data agreed by various intergovernmental bodies and it isn't the place for further scientific debate ie it is a political forum, not a scientific one. 

Good to continue to research and to keep an open mind but this is the action point not the "let's think a bit further point".  If further information comes to light showing that the agreed strategy is wrong then we'll have to reassess but for now we go on the best info available. 

Whether we are in time or politically capable of making a difference is another matter..

 
Please follow the link, I can't stress it enough.

This carbon tax, and make no mistake, this is the crux of the biscuit, is huge, and my feeling is that once enacted, it won't be reversed.

{#Arrow}We can't put the shit back in the horse on this one. {#Arrowl}

Bait and Switch and Who Really Gets the Dough

Additional skepticism arose last week when it was revealed by Britain's Lord Christopher Monckton warned that the secretive draft version of the Copenhagen climate change treaty represents a global government power grab on an "unimaginable scale," and mandates the creation of 700 new bureaucracies as well as a colossal raft of new taxes including 2 percent levies on both GDP and every international financial transaction.

The London Guardian states things a bit more strongly, reporting;

"The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank."

So it now appears that this massive new system of global taxation will be paid not to the UN, as originally sold , but directly into the coffers of the World Bank.

This has all the appearances of being the funding mechanism of a World Government run by Banks - not elected and not accountable to anyone.

Perhaps none of us should be surprised. Bankers do claim they are doing "god's work", don't they?




NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 11:15am

 MrsHobieJoe wrote:
Oh- just saw this.  Thanks peeps.  Sorry if I went a bit school marm.

 
whadda you mean "went"  ?  

(/jk)

MrsHobieJoe

MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 15, 2009 - 11:10am

Oh- just saw this.  Thanks peeps.  Sorry if I went a bit school marm.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 87, 88, 89 ... 103, 104, 105  Next