[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Sonos - haresfur - May 26, 2024 - 9:32pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - May 26, 2024 - 8:29pm
 
Funny Videos - ScottFromWyoming - May 26, 2024 - 7:49pm
 
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful - Alchemist - May 26, 2024 - 6:02pm
 
John Prine - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2024 - 5:34pm
 
New Music - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2024 - 5:24pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - May 26, 2024 - 3:51pm
 
Israel - R_P - May 26, 2024 - 3:50pm
 
First World Problems - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2024 - 2:25pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2024 - 2:23pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - May 26, 2024 - 2:13pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - jarro - May 26, 2024 - 1:58pm
 
NYTimes Connections - Bill_J - May 26, 2024 - 1:47pm
 
NY Times Strands - Bill_J - May 26, 2024 - 1:41pm
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - May 26, 2024 - 1:08pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - May 26, 2024 - 12:58pm
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 26, 2024 - 8:02am
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 26, 2024 - 4:37am
 
Artificial Intelligence - R_P - May 25, 2024 - 11:05pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - thisbody - May 25, 2024 - 10:42pm
 
Fascism In America - R_P - May 25, 2024 - 6:16pm
 
The Obituary Page - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 25, 2024 - 2:40pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - May 25, 2024 - 12:57pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - miamizsun - May 25, 2024 - 12:02pm
 
Media Matters - Beaker - May 25, 2024 - 10:59am
 
2024 Elections! - kurtster - May 24, 2024 - 9:43pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - May 24, 2024 - 3:42pm
 
What's that smell? - oldviolin - May 24, 2024 - 3:41pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - May 24, 2024 - 3:40pm
 
Trump - Steely_D - May 24, 2024 - 2:01pm
 
Business as Usual - R_P - May 24, 2024 - 12:49pm
 
It's the economy stupid. - R_P - May 24, 2024 - 12:38pm
 
Bob Dylan - Steely_D - May 24, 2024 - 10:50am
 
Rock mix sound quality below Main and Mellow? - R567 - May 24, 2024 - 9:11am
 
RightWingNutZ - Steely_D - May 24, 2024 - 8:54am
 
Odd sayings - GeneP59 - May 24, 2024 - 8:08am
 
Things You Thought Today - GeneP59 - May 24, 2024 - 8:06am
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - Red_Dragon - May 24, 2024 - 6:55am
 
Nederland / The Netherlands - R_P - May 23, 2024 - 10:03am
 
Music News - Beaker - May 23, 2024 - 8:30am
 
Interviews with the artists - Beaker - May 23, 2024 - 8:12am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 22, 2024 - 8:51pm
 
Science is bullsh*t - GeneP59 - May 22, 2024 - 4:16pm
 
Maarjamaa - oldviolin - May 22, 2024 - 3:32pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - ScottFromWyoming - May 22, 2024 - 3:25pm
 
Coffee - haresfur - May 22, 2024 - 12:12am
 
Most played: what's the range? Last 30 days? 90? - theirongiant - May 21, 2024 - 2:20pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Steely_D - May 20, 2024 - 1:24pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - May 20, 2024 - 12:00pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - May 20, 2024 - 7:50am
 
Shawn Phillips - Isabeau - May 20, 2024 - 6:20am
 
The Corporation - Red_Dragon - May 20, 2024 - 5:08am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - GeneP59 - May 19, 2024 - 4:08pm
 
What can you hear right now? - GeneP59 - May 19, 2024 - 4:07pm
 
China - Isabeau - May 19, 2024 - 2:22pm
 
TV shows you watch - Steely_D - May 19, 2024 - 1:13am
 
Music library - nightdrive - May 18, 2024 - 1:28pm
 
Paul McCartney - miamizsun - May 18, 2024 - 4:06am
 
Virginia News - Steely_D - May 18, 2024 - 2:51am
 
Gnomad here. Who farking deleted my thread? - Red_Dragon - May 17, 2024 - 5:59pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - ScottFromWyoming - May 17, 2024 - 1:43pm
 
DIY - black321 - May 17, 2024 - 9:16am
 
Other Medical Stuff - kurtster - May 16, 2024 - 10:00pm
 
Your Local News - Proclivities - May 16, 2024 - 12:51pm
 
Alexa Show - thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 12:15pm
 
Joe Biden - Steely_D - May 16, 2024 - 1:02am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:13pm
 
how do you feel right now? - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:10pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 12:38pm
 
NASA & other news from space - Beaker - May 15, 2024 - 9:29am
 
Human Rights (Can Science Point The Way) - miamizsun - May 15, 2024 - 5:50am
 
Play the Blues - Steely_D - May 15, 2024 - 1:50am
 
Animal Resistance - R_P - May 14, 2024 - 6:37pm
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - thisbody - May 14, 2024 - 1:27pm
 
Social Media Are Changing Everything - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2024 - 8:08am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next
Post to this Topic
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:47am

 JrzyTmata wrote:

our regular stores do. Even CVS has a program when using a reusable bag.
I would guess most do, you might have to ask.
 
I never shop at those stores, so it doesn't matter.

JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:44am

 hippiechick wrote:

Whole Foods does. Trader Joes gives you a raffle ticket. The regular stores do not give you anything.
 
our regular stores do. Even CVS has a program when using a reusable bag.
I would guess most do, you might have to ask.

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:42am

 JrzyTmata wrote:

Every supermarket I ever shopped gives you a 5¢ discount per bag when you bring your own.
 
Whole Foods does. Trader Joes gives you a raffle ticket. The regular stores do not give you anything.

JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:40am

 hippiechick wrote:

If people want to used grocery bags, they should have to pay 10c for each one. That would help curtail the use. We always take our own bags to the store.
 
Every supermarket I ever shopped gives you a 5¢ discount per bag when you bring your own.

oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 7:56am

If people want to use plastic grocery bags they should get .10 off for each one they bring back to the store for credit (with limits of course)
and the store get credit from the cart manufacturer that melts them down to make new wheels, which won't go bonka bonka bonka...
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 7:50am

 oldslabsides wrote:


"Los Angeles just enacted a ban on plastic grocery bags. That put three or four manufacturers out of business,'' Stone, a pharmacist from Temecula, said.

wow.  there's some priorities for ya.  hey, Stone, let's bring back the manufacture of DDT, I'm sure that'll provide lots of jobs for your new state.  idiot.



 
If people want to used grocery bags, they should have to pay 10c for each one. That would help curtail the use. We always take our own bags to the store.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 7:04am

 kurtster wrote:


A new twist on a very old idea.  As a native born and raised there, this has been an ongoing debate ever since I can remember and that's back to the 50's.

Back in the 60's and before, California was a very conservative state, Western style, and saw Southern California draining the resources of the the North including water, timber and energy and mostly tax revenue.  It was the North that wanted to ditch the South.  The South was busy trying to irrigate an unihabitable desert and build highways that the tax base down there could not provide for. 

Southern California is more dependent on foreign water than anything else.  As a kid in the 60's, it was breaking news when the Colorado River actually made it all the way to the Gulf of California.  It usually was diverted so much that it never made it to the Gulf.  To understand the west, one must look at the history of water and water rights.

Now the San Joaquin Valley has been dried up by Easterners because of a stupid little fish and put thousands out of work and driven up the price of food in the process unnecessarily.

Freaking Yankees screw up everything, everywhere.  Carpetbaggers. 

 

"Los Angeles just enacted a ban on plastic grocery bags. That put three or four manufacturers out of business,'' Stone, a pharmacist from Temecula, said.

wow.  there's some priorities for ya.  hey, Stone, let's bring back the manufacture of DDT, I'm sure that'll provide lots of jobs for your new state.  idiot.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 6:58am

 hippiechick wrote: 

A new twist on a very old idea.  As a native born and raised there, this has been an ongoing debate ever since I can remember and that's back to the 50's.

Back in the 60's and before, California was a very conservative state, Western style, and saw Southern California draining the resources of the the North including water, timber and energy and mostly tax revenue.  It was the North that wanted to ditch the South.  The South was busy trying to irrigate an unihabitable desert and build highways that the tax base down there could not provide for. 

Southern California is more dependent on foreign water than anything else.  As a kid in the 60's, it was breaking news when the Colorado River actually made it all the way to the Gulf of California.  It usually was diverted so much that it never made it to the Gulf.  To understand the west, one must look at the history of water and water rights.

Now the San Joaquin Valley has been dried up by Easterners because of a stupid little fish and put thousands out of work and driven up the price of food in the process unnecessarily.

Freaking Yankees screw up everything, everywhere.  Carpetbaggers. 
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 6:35am

'South California' proposed as 51st state by Republican supervisor


samiyam

samiyam Avatar

Location: Moving North


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 7:31am

 hippiechick wrote:

debt
 


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 7:15am

 donna_birichina wrote:
And then there's this:

California license plates could soon carry advertising


A new proposed bill in California would put digital advertisements on vehicle license plates to help pull the cash-strapped state out of dept.

 
debt

donna_birichina

donna_birichina Avatar

Location: in the middle
Gender: Female


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 7:14am

And then there's this:

California license plates could soon carry advertising


A new proposed bill in California would put digital advertisements on vehicle license plates to help pull the cash-strapped state out of dept.
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 25, 2010 - 5:17am

 kurtster wrote:

How ironic you made that statement in this thread.  In California, gas prices did in fact rise several years ago directly because overall consumption went down because of economizing.  The state had to raise the taxes on gas because of falling tax revenue due to falling consumption.  Therefore, the base price of gas went up.  We still have fluctuations, but the minimum price did go up.

Another example lies in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the municipal water district had to raise prices because of conservation, again because usuge went down so much, they could no longer cover fixed expenses without a price increase.
 
That is ironic.  I was not aware of that taking place in California - so I stand (or sit, actually) corrected.  I believe the main reason for the Charlotte increases was based on drought conditions - which did reduce consumption, but the (often mandatory) conservation was spurred by reduced supply - which will increase prices.  Anyhow, thanks for pointing out those examples.
{#Cheers}

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 5:31pm

 Proclivities wrote:

I agree with some of your points (especially the "data-collecting" question), but the argument that "if we use less they'll charge more" is unsubstantiated and frequently used as an alarmist ploy.  That was a major talking point of supply-side types who, over 30 years ago, opposed regulations for higher automobile fuel-efficiency.  Gasoline prices did not rise when (or because) more people started driving fuel-efficient, compact cars.  For one thing, that theory contradicts the sacred Capitalist principle of supply-and-demand.
Though assuming energy providers are "principled" may be a stretch.
 
How ironic you made that statement in this thread.  In California, gas prices did in fact rise several years ago directly because overall consumption went down because of economizing.  The state had to raise the taxes on gas because of falling tax revenue due to falling consumption.  Therefore, the base price of gas went up.  We still have fluctuations, but the minimum price did go up.

Another example lies in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the municipal water district had to raise prices because of conservation, again because usuge went down so much, they could no longer cover fixed expenses without a price increase.

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 4:33pm

 miamizsun wrote:

One of the "unintended consequences" will be fluctuating (variable) rates, which will allow them to increase the price during peak usage.

I think as we use less, or become more efficient, they may charge us more, which would cancel out any savings to the end user, but potentially boost profits for providers.

These meters will allow very specific two way monitoring, which would allow them to charge for specific appliances/activities if they choose.

I understand the angle of well connected corporations using their government "buddies" to gouge us, nothing new there.

What bothers me is where do they think they get the right to do any of this?

Politicians and bureaucrats collecting data (spying) to what end?

Government intervention in markets always causes problems.

Regards
 
I agree with some of your points (especially the "data-collecting" question), but the argument that "if we use less they'll charge more" is unsubstantiated and frequently used as an alarmist ploy.  That was a major talking point of supply-side types who, over 30 years ago, opposed regulations for higher automobile fuel-efficiency.  Gasoline prices did not rise when (or because) more people started driving fuel-efficient, compact cars.  For one thing, that theory contradicts the sacred Capitalist principle of supply-and-demand.
Though assuming energy providers are "principled" may be a stretch.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 4:16pm

 dmax wrote:

I was offered the choice a year or so ago, but my wife vetoed the idea that, on power hungry days when it's likely that we'll need the AC, it would be possible for PG&E to throttle our use.

 
One of the "unintended consequences" will be fluctuating (variable) rates, which will allow them to increase the price during peak usage.

I think as we use less, or become more efficient, they may charge us more, which would cancel out any savings to the end user, but potentially boost profits for providers.

These meters will allow very specific two way monitoring, which would allow them to charge for specific appliances/activities if they choose.

I understand the angle of well connected corporations using their government "buddies" to gouge us, nothing new there.

What bothers me is where do they think they get the right to do any of this?

Politicians and bureaucrats collecting data (spying) to what end?

Government intervention in markets always causes problems.

Regards

(former member)

(former member) Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:55pm

 kurtster wrote:


OBTW, does anyone still call PG&E, pigs, goats and elephants anymore ?  I remember that from days gone by.
 
Heh. Never heard that!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:51pm

 dmax wrote:

I was offered the choice a year or so ago, but my wife vetoed the idea that, on power hungry days when it's likely that we'll need the AC, it would be possible for PG&E to throttle our use.

 
Glad to hear participation is voluntary, I wasn't sure.  My concerns would be more relevant if it was mandatory.

OBTW, does anyone still call PG&E, pigs, goats and elephants anymore ?  I remember that from days gone by.

(former member)

(former member) Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:45pm

 kurtster wrote:

I may be wrong, but there is no choice involved with participation as I understand it.  And the smart grid will overide your thermostat settings, if someone decides that your settings are inapropriate.
 
I was offered the choice a year or so ago, but my wife vetoed the idea that, on power hungry days when it's likely that we'll need the AC, it would be possible for PG&E to throttle our use.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 24, 2010 - 3:24pm

California welfare cards can be used in many casino ATMs

Times review finds that in more than half of the state's casinos and gaming rooms, welfare recipients can get cash from state-issued EBT cards.


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next