[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - Coaxial - Aug 23, 2019 - 8:09pm
 
Trump - kcar - Aug 23, 2019 - 6:27pm
 
What are you listening to now? - westslope - Aug 23, 2019 - 6:23pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - SeriousLee - Aug 23, 2019 - 5:47pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - ledzeplisa - Aug 23, 2019 - 5:39pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Aug 23, 2019 - 5:30pm
 
List of Feel-Good Movies - SeriousLee - Aug 23, 2019 - 4:26pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - SeriousLee - Aug 23, 2019 - 4:24pm
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - Steely_D - Aug 23, 2019 - 2:10pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - oldviolin - Aug 23, 2019 - 11:55am
 
Freedom of speech? - oldviolin - Aug 23, 2019 - 11:42am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - miamizsun - Aug 23, 2019 - 11:07am
 
Hong Kong - miamizsun - Aug 23, 2019 - 10:44am
 
OldSchool 60s-70s - Proclivities - Aug 23, 2019 - 9:29am
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Aug 23, 2019 - 7:48am
 
Fix My Car - miamizsun - Aug 23, 2019 - 7:44am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Aug 23, 2019 - 7:43am
 
App is slow in skipping songs and loading playlists - BillG - Aug 23, 2019 - 7:42am
 
TED Talks - Red_Dragon - Aug 23, 2019 - 7:38am
 
Brazil - R_P - Aug 23, 2019 - 7:12am
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Aug 23, 2019 - 6:55am
 
surrealistic views... - miamizsun - Aug 23, 2019 - 6:22am
 
New Music - miamizsun - Aug 23, 2019 - 6:17am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Aug 23, 2019 - 6:17am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Aug 23, 2019 - 5:44am
 
rotation - miamizsun - Aug 23, 2019 - 4:54am
 
Live Music - sirdroseph - Aug 23, 2019 - 4:48am
 
What's your addiction? - miamizsun - Aug 23, 2019 - 4:26am
 
RP 20th anniversary, Feb 2020 - sirdroseph - Aug 23, 2019 - 4:11am
 
Who is? - sirdroseph - Aug 23, 2019 - 4:08am
 
Unresearched Conspiracy Theories - Steely_D - Aug 22, 2019 - 7:25pm
 
Business as Usual - R_P - Aug 22, 2019 - 7:20pm
 
Fox Spews - R_P - Aug 22, 2019 - 6:59pm
 
Animal Resistance - R_P - Aug 22, 2019 - 6:04pm
 
The All-Things Beatles Forum - kurtster - Aug 22, 2019 - 2:13pm
 
Films you're excited about. - miamizsun - Aug 22, 2019 - 12:51pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Steely_D - Aug 22, 2019 - 11:47am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Aug 22, 2019 - 11:42am
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - pilgrim - Aug 22, 2019 - 11:33am
 
And the good news is.... - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 22, 2019 - 9:33am
 
The Lost Room - Proclivities - Aug 22, 2019 - 8:53am
 
Happy friendship Day - Proclivities - Aug 22, 2019 - 7:28am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Aug 22, 2019 - 7:00am
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Aug 22, 2019 - 6:57am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Aug 22, 2019 - 6:51am
 
Most under rated albums ? - sirdroseph - Aug 22, 2019 - 5:51am
 
Just Time Lapse - miamizsun - Aug 22, 2019 - 4:24am
 
Propriety - sirdroseph - Aug 22, 2019 - 2:01am
 
New Zealand - haresfur - Aug 21, 2019 - 8:51pm
 
Best Song Comments. - haresfur - Aug 21, 2019 - 6:48pm
 
Got my Goat - Antigone - Aug 21, 2019 - 6:19pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - kurtster - Aug 21, 2019 - 4:36pm
 
Canada - westslope - Aug 21, 2019 - 1:45pm
 
Private messages in a public forum - oldviolin - Aug 21, 2019 - 10:28am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Aug 21, 2019 - 10:17am
 
A History of Violence - oldviolin - Aug 21, 2019 - 10:14am
 
True Confessions - oldviolin - Aug 21, 2019 - 8:58am
 
Regarding cats - sunybuny - Aug 21, 2019 - 8:49am
 
Stupid Questions (and Answers) - Proclivities - Aug 21, 2019 - 8:08am
 
BACK TO THE 80's - R_P - Aug 21, 2019 - 7:23am
 
RP App for Android - armando - Aug 21, 2019 - 7:02am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - sirdroseph - Aug 21, 2019 - 7:01am
 
Syncing streams for multi-room Radio Paradise? - radparadise - Aug 21, 2019 - 6:41am
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - miamizsun - Aug 21, 2019 - 4:52am
 
By jimminy! Cricket! - dxnerd86 - Aug 21, 2019 - 1:44am
 
Israel - westslope - Aug 20, 2019 - 11:11pm
 
stupid (hey it's whatever thread) - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 20, 2019 - 7:10pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - Red_Dragon - Aug 20, 2019 - 5:21pm
 
DXing- long distance radio reception - dxnerd86 - Aug 20, 2019 - 3:27pm
 
Surfing! - kurtster - Aug 20, 2019 - 2:25pm
 
Interesting Art - miamizsun - Aug 20, 2019 - 2:09pm
 
Oops! - ScottFromWyoming - Aug 20, 2019 - 7:52am
 
China - black321 - Aug 20, 2019 - 7:46am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - miamizsun - Aug 20, 2019 - 4:25am
 
Regarding dogs - sirdroseph - Aug 20, 2019 - 4:02am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Thoughtful Suggestions for Improving America Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Post to this Topic
dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 2:48pm

 javahnagila wrote:
one word: tolerance

 

I will not just tolerate your new av, I will wholeheartedly support it.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 2:30pm

 maryte wrote:


 

 
Wha?  I didn't say "state's rights."

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 2:28pm

 maryte wrote:

 
Not parsing for you? Works for me.

maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 2:22pm

 oldslabsides wrote:

A state has no rights, only people have rights.  That so many of them choose to give them up to the state is very disturbing to me.
 

 oldslabsides wrote:

They all assume responsibilities that are not those of the national government.  They all represent the abdication of rights and state responsibilities.  They are all financed by a confiscatory system of robbery called taxation.  They are all backed by the police power of the national government.
 

 
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 2:13pm

 maryte wrote:


Of course I accept that about you!  I sure as hell can't change how you feel.  Although I've got to wonder about your concerns that the poor state is having its rights usurped.  Oklahoma must be heaven, because state gubmint in Texas imposes on its citizenry far worse than the federal gubmint...

 
A state has no rights, only people have rights.  That so many of them choose to give them up to the state is very disturbing to me.

maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 2:11pm

 oldslabsides wrote:

Acceptance, say, of the fact that some of us feel very threatened by the power of the state?  That some of us just want to be left alone to take responsibility for ourselves without the intrusions of a nanny state?  Just askin'...
 

Of course I accept that about you!  I sure as hell can't change how you feel.  Although I've got to wonder about your concerns that the poor state is having its rights usurped.  Oklahoma must be heaven, because state gubmint in Texas imposes on its citizenry far worse than the federal gubmint...
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 2:03pm

 maryte wrote:


better:  Acceptance

 
Acceptance, say, of the fact that some of us feel very threatened by the power of the state?  That some of us just want to be left alone to take responsibility for ourselves without the intrusions of a nanny state?  Just askin'...

maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:59pm

 javahnagila wrote:
one word: tolerance

 

better:  Acceptance
javahnagila

javahnagila Avatar

Location: Spaced Coast of Florida
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:55pm

one word: tolerance
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:55pm

 zipper wrote:

I so love your communication skills and your ability to grasp the details and apply them to the big picture in a way that anyone can comprehend.
 
That makes at least two of us. {#Yes}
zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:53pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
kurtster wrote:
If the only end user of your product is the government, then it makes sense to me.  The landscaper in Waukegan probably isn't netting more than $400K. 

And what if it isn't? The burden of compliance would fall on anyone doing business with the feds at any level. Or do you want to add yet another accounting/compliance requirement: state what portion of your company's income comes from federal contracting as well, documented with this form and that table and audited by this certified accounting agency, paid for out of overhead. None of which cuts the grass.

It doesn't matter that the guy cutting the grass doesn't make more than $471,000/year (and as far as I'm concerned, bully for him if he does)—he has to prove he doesn't, and proving he doesn't takes time and money. It means there's no point taking on a federal contract for a small job—you'll lose money. You need to take on lots of federal contracts or charge more for them, putting you at a disadvantage to a company that does nothing but. You're accomplishing the opposite of your intent.

You might consider this feel good legislation, where as I see it as a backlash to the outragous missuse of the TARP fund and similar proposals.  A line must be drawn somewhere. 

I consider it both: a misguided attempt to fix a problem caused by red tape with more red tape. Motivating it by a desire to punish those who took advantage of the system Congress put in place doesn't change the outcome or punish those truly responsible. The guy cutting grass didn't get any TARP money.

Imagine the impact on Major League Baseball, which exists in its present form by an Act of Congress as an Anti Trust exempt organization.  Sure, there will be ways to seek out loopholes, there always are.  But just putting this out there for consideration should make people shudder, especially those who have been milking at the governments teet for far to long.

I can imagine the impact on MLB: none at all. An exemption from antitrust law can be undone separately, at any time. So do that, and leave the lawn maintenance guy alone.
Wouldn't you love to see the wages at Haliburton affected by this approach ?  Or how about the wages at Exxon Mobil if they sell fuel to the government ?  Let these companies reinvest the difference in their companies or pay dividends to the stock holders and pay more taxes on earnings not diverted to the same.  I realize this isn't perfect, but do you have a better idea ?  Trillions of dollars have disappeared down ratholes overnight and no one seems to have a meaningful idea as to how to stop it.
 
No, I wouldn't. I'd rather see each company's owners set compensation based on the value added by the employee, or the scarcity and necessity of the work s/he does. Or whatever the owners of the company want to use—it's none of our business. If they pay too much the cost of their goods and services will go up and somebody who pays less gets the job.

You want my idea? Scrap the requirements irrelevant to the actual work. Eliminate the intrusive and burdensome accounting rules that govern every minute detail of doing business with the government; rules that bloat administration within companies and make them uncompetitive with non-governmental customers.

As for TARP and other such boondoggles: even easier. Don't do it. Admit there are problems government is helpless against, and concentrate on the ones it can help with, and should help with.
 
I so love your communication skills and your ability to grasp the details and apply them to the big picture in a way that anyone can comprehend.

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:47pm

kurtster wrote:
If the only end user of your product is the government, then it makes sense to me.  The landscaper in Waukegan probably isn't netting more than $400K. 

And what if it isn't? The burden of compliance would fall on anyone doing business with the feds at any level. Or do you want to add yet another accounting/compliance requirement: state what portion of your company's income comes from federal contracting as well, documented with this form and that table and audited by this certified accounting agency, paid for out of overhead. None of which cuts the grass.

It doesn't matter that the guy cutting the grass doesn't make more than $471,000/year (and as far as I'm concerned, bully for him if he does)—he has to prove he doesn't, and proving he doesn't takes time and money. It means there's no point taking on a federal contract for a small job—you'll lose money. You need to take on lots of federal contracts or charge more for them, putting you at a disadvantage to a company that does nothing but. You're accomplishing the opposite of your intent.

You might consider this feel good legislation, where as I see it as a backlash to the outragous missuse of the TARP fund and similar proposals.  A line must be drawn somewhere. 

I consider it both: a misguided attempt to fix a problem caused by red tape with more red tape. Motivating it by a desire to punish those who took advantage of the system Congress put in place doesn't change the outcome or punish those truly responsible. The guy cutting grass didn't get any TARP money.

Imagine the impact on Major League Baseball, which exists in its present form by an Act of Congress as an Anti Trust exempt organization.  Sure, there will be ways to seek out loopholes, there always are.  But just putting this out there for consideration should make people shudder, especially those who have been milking at the governments teet for far to long.

I can imagine the impact on MLB: none at all. An exemption from antitrust law can be undone separately, at any time. So do that, and leave the lawn maintenance guy alone.

Wouldn't you love to see the wages at Haliburton affected by this approach ?  Or how about the wages at Exxon Mobil if they sell fuel to the government ?  Let these companies reinvest the difference in their companies or pay dividends to the stock holders and pay more taxes on earnings not diverted to the same.  I realize this isn't perfect, but do you have a better idea ?  Trillions of dollars have disappeared down ratholes overnight and no one seems to have a meaningful idea as to how to stop it.
 
No, I wouldn't. I'd rather see each company's owners set compensation based on the value added by the employee, or the scarcity and necessity of the work s/he does. Or whatever the owners of the company want to use—it's none of our business. If they pay too much the cost of their goods and services will go up and somebody who pays less gets the job.

You want my idea? Scrap the requirements irrelevant to the actual work. Eliminate the intrusive and burdensome accounting rules that govern every minute detail of doing business with the government; rules that bloat administration within companies and make them uncompetitive with non-governmental customers.

As for TARP and other such boondoggles: even easier. Don't do it. Admit there are problems government is helpless against, and concentrate on the ones it can help with, and should help with.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:44pm

 Beaker wrote:

Sorry Schlabby, I wasn't suggesting you were any one persuasion over another, beyond what we already know - a well-armed man with mullet.


 
Yer pressin' yer luck, Canuck. {#Lol}
maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:42pm

 Beaker wrote:

Some are more liberal than others.  Waaay more liberal.

When the far right does the reacharound and runs into the far left, what do ya call that anyway? 

 



Fixed your typo. 

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:40pm

 Beaker wrote:

Some are more liberal than others.  Waaay more liberal.

When the far left does the reacharound and runs into the far right, what do ya call that anyway? 

 
I think anyone would be hard pressed to describe my positions as either liberal or conservative.  And those libertarians?  Too conservative for me. {#Lol}
Zep

Zep Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:39pm

Beaker wrote:
Some are more liberal than others. Waaay more liberal.

When the far left does the reacharound and runs into the far right, what do ya call that anyway?




Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:36pm

 maryte wrote:


All generalities.  Like everyone at RP is a liberal. 

 
There are at least two people around here I can think of who are far better at specifics than myself.  I don't think I was quite as general as your analogy. {#Wink}
maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:33pm

 oldslabsides wrote:

They all assume responsibilities that are not those of the national government.  They all represent the abdication of rights and state responsibilities.  They are all financed by a confiscatory system of robbery called taxation.  They are all backed by the police power of the national government.
 

All generalities.  Like everyone at RP is a liberal. 
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:29pm

 maryte wrote:


Articulate where all of these organizations have done more harm than good.  That would be thoughtful.

 
They all assume responsibilities that are not those of the national government.  They all represent the abdication of rights and state responsibilities.  They are all financed by a confiscatory system of robbery called taxation.  They are all backed by the police power of the national government.

oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2009 - 1:27pm

 kurtster wrote:


Life is not without risk {#Wink}

 
Kurt, in spite of my high ideals, you would know infinitely more about that than I.

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11  Next