[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Listener-supported — Commercial-free
Album:
Avg rating:
0

Your rating:
Total ratings: 0










Released: 0
Length: 0:00
Plays (last 30 days): 0
share tweet wikiwebsitesearchamg
cd
mp3
search
Comments (55)add comment
I was trying to wait this one out but someone was coming down the stairs to see what the hell this was all about and I had to shut it down...
Posted 13 years ago by tovarisch    [ Reply ]
This is just shit. A party piece, not even very well executed.
Posted 13 years ago by Wittgenstein    [ Reply ]
A harsh, yet entirely justified sentiment.
 mauflex wrote:
Bill, can you please STOP PLAYING this f*cking s*it? Don't you see the 3.7 rating?? Are you blind or what?
 


Posted 13 years ago by dburges    [ Reply ]
I honestly don't see what Neil Gaiman sees in her. Every time I see her the phrase that most often comes to mind is "undeservedly pretentious". 

Finally had to turn my media player off until it was over. 
Posted 13 years ago by Catalytic    [ Reply ]
Big Amanda Palmer/Dresden Dolls fan, but I don't know what the hell she was thinking.

Posted 13 years ago by bluefrog    [ Reply ]
Bill, can you please STOP PLAYING this f*cking s*it? Don't you see the 3.7 rating?? Are you blind or what?
Posted 13 years ago by mauflex    [ Reply ]
Wow, what a party this must have been, a seemingly sober (could be the ludes) Courtney Love accompanied by Jake Shimbakuro (SP?) on the Uke... can't wait for the next BIG hit off this one....{#Whistle}
Posted 13 years ago by SpamNRice    [ Reply ]
Damn what a awefull cover
Posted 13 years ago by flapser    [ Reply ]
At first I thought, hhhmm different but then the more I heard... it "just wears me out"

Posted 13 years ago by Shaker    [ Reply ]
I think they mispelled tragic.
Posted 13 years ago by Wittgenstein    [ Reply ]
 sirdroseph wrote:


Wow! You know a song is bad when RT gives a negative comment!!{#Lol}
 

Woah... That's kind of unprecedented, isn't?
Posted 13 years ago by Fables85    [ Reply ]
No effin way.
Posted 13 years ago by mirland    [ Reply ]
I think in keeping with the name of the song, a ukelele is the perfect instrument for her. It's like a toy guitar - it pretends with all its little heart and soul to be a Stratocaster, but only will ever be a Toys 'R Us novelty.  Sad, really.  Poor little ukelele.
Posted 13 years ago by Cynaera    [ Reply ]
 romeotuma wrote:


She might be able to do something interesting with Marilyn Manson's "The Fight Song", but she just stinks up the cover of this Radiohead song...  yuck...

 

 

Wow! You know a song is bad when RT gives a negative comment!!{#Lol}
Posted 13 years ago by sirdroseph    [ Reply ]
This is an absolutely fantastic song that has been totally ruinated!!!!! {#Puke}This woman should be sued by Radiohead pronto!!! Knowing what pretentious pricks Radiohead are, they probably already are!{#Lol}
Posted 13 years ago by sirdroseph    [ Reply ]
{#Arrowd} Having trouble with the technology, Ludite? {#Whistle}  {#Lol}
Posted 13 years ago by hobiejoe    [ Reply ]
Why is it all these asses playing ukeleles lately think they're being original?
Posted 13 years ago by iggam    [ Reply ]
Actually, I quite like this . . .
Posted 13 years ago by ludite    [ Reply ]
If you ever consider stopping a song before the end, now is the time.
Posted 13 years ago by riverjim    [ Reply ]
 romeotuma wrote:


This pathetic cover is pure putrid buttmud...  it does NOTHING for the original...  what a waste...


 
Man, I just gave you props for "Alone Again Or," and you throw this. Geez.


Posted 13 years ago by WonderLizard    [ Reply ]
Someone give her Ukelelehead a shake...

Posted 13 years ago by 3enny_3lanco    [ Reply ]
We know you love covers Bill, but this might be a bit too much. This sounds like it might work as a sketch on SNL when Radiohead was the band of the evening.
Posted 13 years ago by beinder    [ Reply ]
hahahahaha.  Now make it stop!
Posted 13 years ago by Dior    [ Reply ]

Really lame!


Posted 13 years ago by maggie6969    [ Reply ]
 SirLars wrote:
i would expect slightly better with a "magical" ukelele

6 

 

{#Lol} - you're right.  I like her voice but this rendition is a little too stark.

Posted 13 years ago by justlistening    [ Reply ]
I like it. . .
Posted 13 years ago by vandal    [ Reply ]
didn't realize you could make this song any worse...was wrong on that count.
Posted 13 years ago by BigTimber    [ Reply ]
Ye gods this is harsh.
Posted 13 years ago by Jamunca    [ Reply ]
A perfectly imperfect interpretation.

Posted 13 years ago by drife    [ Reply ]
Brave, but unsuccessful, in my opinion. Just don't feel any emotion in this cover at all.
Posted 13 years ago by jhorton    [ Reply ]
Um wow, ukelele? Could this get any more sickeningly self-indulgent?

Posted 13 years ago by Shouc    [ Reply ]
i would expect slightly better with a "magical" ukelele

6 

Posted 13 years ago by SirLars    [ Reply ]
Her unusual voice sounds better doing her own songs.

This is like listening to Dylan cover McCartney.  Blech!
Posted 13 years ago by ziggytrix    [ Reply ]
 californiaview wrote:
Please make it stop :(
 
Hahaha! I was just about to say the exact same thing!

Posted 13 years ago by audiophelia    [ Reply ]
I hate fake plastic trees!

It's real plastic trees or nothing for me. 

Posted 13 years ago by MojoJojo    [ Reply ]
I'll donate more money if you never play this 'song' again. Holy cow, it is just awful.
Posted 13 years ago by jatkins679    [ Reply ]
Please make it stop :(
Posted 13 years ago by californiaview    [ Reply ]
{#Sealed}
Posted 13 years ago by rdo    [ Reply ]
Do not mind this. Will enjoy it in my yard with a beer. Do not want the album.
 
6. Could move 2 points either way.
Posted 13 years ago by ScottFromWyoming    [ Reply ]
The singing's certainly an improvement on Thom Yorke's angst-ridden high-pitched whining, shame about the ukulele. Now, if you could mix Amanda Palmer's singing with the Radiohead band - that would really be worth listening to. 6 from the Nottingham jury for the sheer eclecticism and iconclasm of the cover, and because it hacks off Radiohead fans so much :o)
Posted 13 years ago by fredriley    [ Reply ]
Es una mierda

Posted 13 years ago by cppedro    [ Reply ]
Whateves.......
Posted 13 years ago by Beez    [ Reply ]
Again, I like hearing an alternative version of a song I rarely listened to.  Interpretation seems good to me!
Posted 13 years ago by cohifi    [ Reply ]
wow i guess anyone can be a "rock star" or have their CD pressed these days..

strongly preferring the reggae cover album RH cover tunes we've been hearing.
Posted 13 years ago by floydoftherocks    [ Reply ]
Amusing, but I certainly prefer the original.
Posted 13 years ago by zogma    [ Reply ]
I love a good cover... sadly this wasn't one. Perhaps I just love the original too much but I thought that was pretty terrible.
Posted 13 years ago by Jacksonstat    [ Reply ]
Hmm...  Yes Bill, that is a bit bizarre...

Posted 13 years ago by RC_in_Bezerkeley    [ Reply ]
 romeotuma wrote:
This pathetic cover is pure putrid buttmud...  it does NOTHING for the original...  what a waste...
 
...but is it better than the stuff on Peter Gabriel's new CD? Hmm?


Posted 13 years ago by crockydile    [ Reply ]
 romeotuma wrote:


This pathetic cover is pure putrid buttmud...  it does NOTHING for the original...  what a waste...


 

Ouch!! When romeo goes negative, a rare thing indeed, lookout.
Posted 13 years ago by lemmoth    [ Reply ]
Great cover!
Posted 13 years ago by Phlegmaticman    [ Reply ]
 romeotuma wrote:


This pathetic cover is pure putrid buttmud...  it does NOTHING for the original...  what a waste...



  Holy crap, Romeo posted a negative comment!!!

Posted 13 years ago by Droidac    [ Reply ]
Hmmmmnnn, interesting idea — not sure what I think, need a few more listens
Posted 13 years ago by socalhol    [ Reply ]
Wow.  First to comment.

OK - not averse to creative covers

Like the ukelele generally

Voice pretty good

Love the song of course

ok Cool
Posted 13 years ago by lemmoth    [ Reply ]