Kurt, Let's get back to the supreme court issues and your continued support for trump even though he is a convicted felon. You use every slippery move possible to avoid saying that, or any of the other crimes he is accused of disqualify him as president. Oh, his appeal hasn't gone through to get a ruling from the Supreme Court? Most other felons are sentenced and serve time and maybe, eventually their appeals wind through the process and maybe are taken up by the Supreme Court years later. Usually that won't happen. Sure, due process and all before they are convicted. But once someone is convicted of a crime, they are considered a criminal. You are willing to vote for a felon for president. No way around that. You will continue to turn a blind eye to his being a felon and all indications he is a creep, including his own wife saying he raped her. Your bar for his behaviour is set at it is ok until the Supreme Court rules against him. Oh, and the places like all his attempts to tamper with the election where the Supreme Court ruled against him don't count. And the many legal cases that he and his organisation have lost don't count if they were not criminal cases. So if you wonder why several people here treat your opinions with contempt, that's probably a lot of it.
Well when you look at the post below and watch the associated video you will find out that Trump is not a convicted felon. Nor is he a convicted rapist as you all keep insisting.
Words do matter.
To continue calling Trump a convicted felon would make you or anyone else who does the same, a liar.
Back to you and anyone else to whom this may apply.
WTF are you talking about ? What does this have to do with the topic which was the SCOTUS ? I don't recall making any such statements. Show me the quotes. You're channeling someone else, maybe veev ? Sounds like something he would say.
You're fascination with rape is beyond comprehension. Rape this, rape that, here a rape there a rape, everywhere a rape, rape ... old Mac kcar had a dream e, i, e, i, oh ....
.
Do you fantasize about it ? Did your mommy cut you off too soon ?
You have seriously gone off the reservation. You're too far gone to talk to at all anymore.
Geezus, you really need to get laid, stat !!
Or maybe canoeing ...
.
Kurt,
Let's get back to the supreme court issues and your continued support for trump even though he is a convicted felon.
You use every slippery move possible to avoid saying that, or any of the other crimes he is accused of disqualify him as president. Oh, his appeal hasn't gone through to get a ruling from the Supreme Court? Most other felons are sentenced and serve time and maybe, eventually their appeals wind through the process and maybe are taken up by the Supreme Court years later. Usually that won't happen. Sure, due process and all before they are convicted. But once someone is convicted of a crime, they are considered a criminal. You are willing to vote for a felon for president. No way around that.
You will continue to turn a blind eye to his being a felon and all indications he is a creep, including his own wife saying he raped her. Your bar for his behaviour is set at it is ok until the Supreme Court rules against him. Oh, and the places like all his attempts to tamper with the election where the Supreme Court ruled against him don't count. And the many legal cases that he and his organisation have lost don't count if they were not criminal cases.
So if you wonder why several people here treat your opinions with contempt, that's probably a lot of it.
Trump's still a rapist and a convicted felon, pendejo. He still owes over half a billion dollars in civil damages. He cannot stop lying. He sucked as president.
Traci Lords is irrelevant to this "discussion."
I can understand why you support Trump. He's a clown and you're a clown. But still: GFY and wipe your ass while you're at it.
Good lord, you're the very model of an illogical and immature fool. Have you ever successfully argued a position, for real benefits/consequences in your life? I'd wager: never
Burden of proof is on you, dipshit. But do continue screaming at the clouds.
Trump's still a rapist and a convicted felon, pendejo. He still owes over half a billion dollars in civil damages. He cannot stop lying. He sucked as president.
Traci Lords is irrelevant to this "discussion."
I can understand why you support Trump. He's a clown and you're a clown. But still: GFY and wipe your ass while you're at it.
Except you still can't/won't provide your evidence. So once again, you're just a pointless mosquito. Find something better to do on the 4th of July, dipshit.
Already did, just to refresh my memory. Maybe YOU should re-read the Wiki article! Then I also read news reports on charges laid and outcomes. And it's YOUR claims that are in need of defending & proving - not mine. Nice try though.
Get busy and provide some proof! FYI - Wiki is not proof.
And no, I'm not going to provide research for you, dipshit.
Except you still can't/won't provide your evidence. So once again, you're just a pointless mosquito. Find something better to do on the 4th of July, dipshit.
Falsehoods so easily provable that you couldn't provide evidence to support your claim! Huh!
I referred to Traci Lord's Wikipedia entry and this Wikipedia article about the related trial and conviction of a video distributor. Read them, Beaker.
Already did, just to refresh my memory. Maybe YOU should re-read the Wiki article! Then I also read news reports on charges laid and outcomes. And it's YOUR claims that are in need of defending & proving - not mine. Nice try though.
Get busy and provide some proof! FYI - Wiki is not proof.
And no, I'm not going to provide research for you, dipshit.
If you're going to cite as an example, the underage Traci Lords, you really should be aware of the facts of how she entered the business, made films, and took part in photoshoots for adult mags.
Uttering easily provable falsehoods and lies to support your narrative only illustrates your ignorance and bias on the topic itself.
Falsehoods so easily provable that you couldn't provide evidence to support your claim! Huh!
I referred to Traci Lord's Wikipedia entry and this Wikipedia article about the related trial and conviction of a video distributor. Read them, Beaker.
You're fascination with rape is beyond comprehension. Rape this, rape that, here a rape there a rape, everywhere a rape, rape ... old Mac kcar had a dream e, i, e, i, oh ....
.
The claims of rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment against Trump are numerous and long-established. In one incident of a rape claim, a jury of Trump's peers believed the claim was true and awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million in damages for Trump's defamation of her character. A second jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million in further damages, basing that decision on their belief that Carroll's story of Trump raping her was true and that his statements about her after the first decision were therefore defamatory as well.
The claims of rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment against Trump reveal his pattern of violent criminal behavior, abuse of power and use of threats and coercion to silence the women. Trump's sexual behavior and his behavior in defense of his predatory acts are on their own perfect demonstrations that he's unfit to be president.
Your desperate attempts to defend his rape of Carroll and your silence on the other claims of sex crimes against Trump show quite clearly that when it comes to Trump, your moral compass and ability to think rationally disappear.
Frankly, if you're not being paid to shill for Trump you're missing out on big money. It's gotten to the point where I have no respect for you or your claims. I see people like you as a clear sign that we are near the end of democracy, truth and fairness in this country.
âThey who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.â —Ben Franklin
Traci was 15 IIRC when she passed herself off as 18 using a doctored passport from another person.
Inaccurate/false.
kcar wrote:
People went to prison for failing to do due diligence on verifying her age.
False x 2
If you're going to cite as an example, the underage Traci Lords, you really should be aware of the facts of how she entered the business, made films, and took part in photoshoots for adult mags.
Uttering easily provable falsehoods and lies to support your narrative only illustrates your ignorance and bias on the topic itself.
WTF are you talking about ? What does this have to do with the topic which was the SCOTUS ? I don't recall making any such statements. Show me the quotes.
I'm not sure what your point is. If someone did their due diligence and was shown a falsely issued passport, I wouldn't prosecute them, particularly if they responded appropriately after the fact by removing the films. That surely is a rare case. I don't see the relevance here.
Traci was 15 IIRC when she passed herself off as 18 using a doctored passport from another person. All of her films made before she was 18 were destroyed. People went to prison for failing to do due diligence on verifying her age.
If a woman/girl tells you she's not a minor when she actually is and you have sex with her, you're still criminally liable. If you could have sex with a minor and then claim "she didn't tell me/she said she was 18" as a successful defense, it would be the perfect get-out-of-jail card and render the relevant law useless.
WTF are you talking about ? What does this have to do with the topic which was the SCOTUS ? I don't recall making any such statements. Show me the quotes. You're channeling someone else, maybe veev ? Sounds like something he would say.
Donât even have clue as to what youâre blabbing about but thanks for the shout-out! Baba-booey!
So kcar and rgio and veev who have endorsed his stuff by adding to his comments without doing any corrections to them.
No... my comment below related solely to your defending/excusing predators who say "she looked 18", by deflecting blame to parents using the supposed word of someone who had been abused. Bad parenting doesn't excuse bad actors.
But instead of opening with the "there's nothing to see here"... you engage in defending perverts and criminals. It's a reflex... because you will grasp at anything to defend the criminal insurrectionist you want back in charge. Engaging in the "see looked 18" line of defense shows there is no line that Trump could cross that disqualifies him for you.
you don't care that Trump raped and sexually assaulted women. You said that the jury got it wrong when they sided with E. Jean Carroll's statement that Trump raped her. I believe you called it "a foul tip" instead of a full strike. Classy.
WTF are you talking about ? What does this have to do with the topic which was the SCOTUS ? I don't recall making any such statements. Show me the quotes. You're channeling someone else, maybe veev ? Sounds like something he would say.
You're fascination with rape is beyond comprehension. Rape this, rape that, here a rape there a rape, everywhere a rape, rape ... old Mac kcar had a dream e, i, e, i, oh .... . Do you fantasize about it ? Did your mommy cut you off too soon ?
You have seriously gone off the reservation. You're too far gone to talk to at all anymore.
I'm not sure what your point is. If someone did their due diligence and was shown a falsely issued passport, I wouldn't prosecute them, particularly if they responded appropriately after the fact by removing the films. That surely is a rare case. I don't see the relevance here.
