NYTimes Connections
- ScottFromWyoming - May 28, 2024 - 4:20pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- Steely_D - May 28, 2024 - 3:11pm
Wordle - daily game
- JrzyTmata - May 28, 2024 - 2:59pm
USA! USA! USA!
- kurtster - May 28, 2024 - 2:52pm
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful
- Antigone - May 28, 2024 - 2:42pm
NY Times Strands
- n4ku - May 28, 2024 - 1:57pm
Interviews with the artists
- dischuckin - May 28, 2024 - 1:33pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - May 28, 2024 - 12:02pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- timothy_john - May 28, 2024 - 11:45am
Israel
- R_P - May 28, 2024 - 9:47am
You might be getting old if......
- kurtster - May 28, 2024 - 9:36am
Trump
- Lazy8 - May 28, 2024 - 9:28am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 28, 2024 - 9:12am
Baseball, anyone?
- Proclivities - May 28, 2024 - 9:03am
What makes you smile?
- black321 - May 28, 2024 - 6:20am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 27, 2024 - 9:43pm
RP Daily Trivia Challenge
- ScottFromWyoming - May 27, 2024 - 8:24pm
Poetry Forum
- Manbird - May 27, 2024 - 7:20pm
Climate Change
- haresfur - May 27, 2024 - 6:07pm
The Obituary Page
- rgio - May 27, 2024 - 4:10pm
fortune cookies, says:
- thisbody - May 27, 2024 - 3:50pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - May 27, 2024 - 2:26pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - May 27, 2024 - 11:12am
Favorite Quotes
- oldviolin - May 27, 2024 - 11:08am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - May 27, 2024 - 9:29am
First World Problems
- ColdMiser - May 27, 2024 - 7:33am
Funny Videos
- thisbody - May 27, 2024 - 7:20am
Internet connection
- thisbody - May 27, 2024 - 7:12am
Ways to Listen to RP on WiiM Plus
- earthbased - May 27, 2024 - 6:56am
Things You Thought Today
- thisbody - May 27, 2024 - 6:36am
Roku App - Roku Asterisk Menu
- earthbased - May 27, 2024 - 5:49am
Sonos
- haresfur - May 26, 2024 - 9:32pm
John Prine
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2024 - 5:34pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2024 - 5:24pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- jarro - May 26, 2024 - 1:58pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - May 25, 2024 - 11:05pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- thisbody - May 25, 2024 - 10:42pm
Fascism In America
- R_P - May 25, 2024 - 6:16pm
The Dragons' Roost
- miamizsun - May 25, 2024 - 12:02pm
Media Matters
- Beaker - May 25, 2024 - 10:59am
2024 Elections!
- kurtster - May 24, 2024 - 9:43pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - May 24, 2024 - 3:42pm
What's that smell?
- oldviolin - May 24, 2024 - 3:41pm
Business as Usual
- R_P - May 24, 2024 - 12:49pm
It's the economy stupid.
- R_P - May 24, 2024 - 12:38pm
Bob Dylan
- Steely_D - May 24, 2024 - 10:50am
Rock mix sound quality below Main and Mellow?
- R567 - May 24, 2024 - 9:11am
Odd sayings
- GeneP59 - May 24, 2024 - 8:08am
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- Red_Dragon - May 24, 2024 - 6:55am
Nederland / The Netherlands
- R_P - May 23, 2024 - 10:03am
Music News
- Beaker - May 23, 2024 - 8:30am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 22, 2024 - 8:51pm
Science is bullsh*t
- GeneP59 - May 22, 2024 - 4:16pm
Maarjamaa
- oldviolin - May 22, 2024 - 3:32pm
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- ScottFromWyoming - May 22, 2024 - 3:25pm
Coffee
- haresfur - May 22, 2024 - 12:12am
Most played: what's the range? Last 30 days? 90?
- theirongiant - May 21, 2024 - 2:20pm
What Did You See Today?
- Steely_D - May 20, 2024 - 1:24pm
Shawn Phillips
- Isabeau - May 20, 2024 - 6:20am
The Corporation
- Red_Dragon - May 20, 2024 - 5:08am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- GeneP59 - May 19, 2024 - 4:08pm
What can you hear right now?
- GeneP59 - May 19, 2024 - 4:07pm
China
- Isabeau - May 19, 2024 - 2:22pm
TV shows you watch
- Steely_D - May 19, 2024 - 1:13am
Music library
- nightdrive - May 18, 2024 - 1:28pm
Paul McCartney
- miamizsun - May 18, 2024 - 4:06am
Virginia News
- Steely_D - May 18, 2024 - 2:51am
Gnomad here. Who farking deleted my thread?
- Red_Dragon - May 17, 2024 - 5:59pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- ScottFromWyoming - May 17, 2024 - 1:43pm
DIY
- black321 - May 17, 2024 - 9:16am
Other Medical Stuff
- kurtster - May 16, 2024 - 10:00pm
Your Local News
- Proclivities - May 16, 2024 - 12:51pm
Alexa Show
- thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 12:15pm
Joe Biden
- Steely_D - May 16, 2024 - 1:02am
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:13pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Congress
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10, 11, 12 Next |
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 21, 2013 - 11:38am |
|
aflanigan wrote: I can't wait to hear the whining and complaining when the other side takes their turn at the reigns and this works against the Democrats. Won't be my fault, the only way to truly break the gridlock is to get rid of all the Democrats and Republicans.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
|
haresfur
Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 10, 2013 - 10:15pm |
|
ScottN wrote:gypsyman wrote: Man, you really need to scroll back a few posts to find out what really happened. I am civil to a fault until I am attacked, then its game on. Sorry. However, per usual, the facts don't matter to some folks.
Worth considering. Could be that you have your "facts" wrong. Group Hug!
|
|
ScottN
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 10, 2013 - 9:00pm |
|
gypsyman wrote: Man, you really need to scroll back a few posts to find out what really happened. I am civil to a fault until I am attacked, then its game on. Sorry. However, per usual, the facts don't matter to some folks.
Worth considering. Could be that you have your "facts" wrong.
|
|
DD gypsyman
Location: Joined Nov 27, 2006 Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 10, 2013 - 7:49pm |
|
ScottN wrote: gypsyman wrote:Allow me to respond, Oh Defender of Illogic: (Had to fix your typo) 1. If one had actually read Alinsky, then that would suggest a method. If one had not, it would suggest ignorance. Therefore, there is relevance. 2. So? What correlation to pipelines does that have, specifically? And what statistics, real or even imagined, have you presented? None. 3. Well, what can I say? Your deficiency in making a skillful argument, while displaying embarrassing naivete, conjoined with the obvious lack of a method, makes you a tool. Y'all come back, now. When you are qualified. (BTW, some of my best friends are Bangladeshi... ) I won't feel the tool (or fool) for defending a friend from an inappropriate, vulgar remark you make to them. Goodbye. Man, you really need to scroll back a few posts to find out what really happened. I am civil to a fault until I am attacked, then its game on. Sorry. However, per usual, the facts don't matter to some folks.
|
|
ScottN
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 10, 2013 - 3:19pm |
|
gypsyman wrote:Allow me to respond, Oh Defender of Illogic: (Had to fix your typo) 1. If one had actually read Alinsky, then that would suggest a method. If one had not, it would suggest ignorance. Therefore, there is relevance. 2. So? What correlation to pipelines does that have, specifically? And what statistics, real or even imagined, have you presented? None. 3. Well, what can I say? Your deficiency in making a skillful argument, while displaying embarrassing naivete, conjoined with the obvious lack of a method, makes you a tool. Y'all come back, now. When you are qualified. (BTW, some of my best friends are Bangladeshi... ) I won't feel the tool (or fool) for defending a friend from an inappropriate, vulgar remark you make to them. Goodbye.
|
|
DD gypsyman
Location: Joined Nov 27, 2006 Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 10, 2013 - 1:11pm |
|
ScottN wrote: Excuse me, but your response is illogical, ad hominem, and ah, full of shit. I guess you like to disguise name calling. Doesn't mean you don't do it, you just cloak it in innuendo. 1. Saul Alinky Alinsky and his Rules for Radicals is irrelevant from the perspective of if she read it or not, or is a tool. 2. Bangladeshi engineers (here) are a reality. I am well acquainted with such a person. (a good guy, btw). Many Somalis too. 3. How far up YOUR ass did you go for this response?
Allow me to respond, Oh Defender of Illogic: (Had to fix your typo) 1. If one had actually read Alinsky, then that would suggest a method. If one had not, it would suggest ignorance. Therefore, there is relevance. 2. So? What correlation to pipelines does that have, specifically? And what statistics, real or even imagined, have you presented? None. 3. Well, what can I say? Your deficiency in making a skillful argument, while displaying embarrassing naivete, conjoined with the obvious lack of a method, makes you a tool. Y'all come back, now. When you are qualified. (BTW, some of my best friends are Bangladeshi... )
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 10, 2013 - 12:19pm |
|
|
|
ScottN
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 11:39pm |
|
gypsyman wrote: Sigh. I guess you really can't do this without name-calling. Straight out of Saul Alinky's Rules For Radicals. Have you read it, or are you just a tool? And Bangladesh engineers? How far up your ass did you have to reach to get that one?
Excuse me, but your response is illogical, ad hominem, and ah, full of shit. I guess you like to disguise name calling. Doesn't mean you don't do it, you just cloak it in innuendo. 1. Saul Alinky and his Rules for Radicals is irrelevant from the perspective of if she read it or not, or is a tool. 2. Bangladeshi engineers (here) are a reality. I am well acquainted with such a person. (a good guy, btw). Many Somalis too. 3. How far up YOUR ass did you go for this response?
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 7:45pm |
|
Isabeau wrote: borders? are you serious? there are no borders when it comes to a young Bangladesh man with a wife and child willing to work as an Engineer in the U.S. for only $12,000 a year.
Average U.S. wage for a mid to advanced level of Engineering? $85,000 — $120,000K. Illegals from Mexico are NOT the problem.
LEGAL in and outsourcing by American Corporations is far worse than any low skilled, hard working laborer (who often picks our fruit and cleans homes)
You are Pimple Wise and Tumor Foolish.
Average US wage for American painters, carpenters and related trades ... $25 to $30 hour. Illegal Mexicans $10 hour. You do the math. There are many RPeeps here who work in the trades and will verify my numbers.
|
|
DD gypsyman
Location: Joined Nov 27, 2006 Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 6:49pm |
|
Isabeau wrote: borders? are you serious? there are no borders when it comes to a young Bangladesh man with a wife and child willing to work as an Engineer in the U.S. for only $12,000 a year.
Average U.S. wage for a mid to advanced level of Engineering? $85,000 — $120,000K. Illegals from Mexico are NOT the problem.
LEGAL in and outsourcing by American Corporations is far worse than any low skilled, hard working laborer (who often picks our fruit and cleans homes)
You are Pimple Wise and Tumor Foolish.
Sigh. I guess you really can't do this without name-calling. Straight out of Saul Alinky's Rules For Radicals. Have you read it, or are you just a tool? And Bangladesh engineers? How far up your ass did you have to reach to get that one?
|
|
Isabeau
Location: sou' tex Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 6:32pm |
|
gypsyman wrote: So, you support closing the borders so that American jobs are not stolen by illegals. Didn't see that coming.
borders? are you serious? there are no borders when it comes to a young Bangladesh man with a wife and child willing to work as an Engineer in the U.S. for only $12,000 a year. Average U.S. wage for a mid to advanced level of Engineering? $85,000 — $120,000K. Illegals from Mexico are NOT the problem. LEGAL in and outsourcing by American Corporations is far worse than any low skilled, hard working laborer (who often picks our fruit and cleans homes) You are Pimple Wise and Tumor Foolish.
|
|
DD gypsyman
Location: Joined Nov 27, 2006 Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 5:33pm |
|
Isabeau wrote: And you are the height of naiveté if you believe those positions won't be filled by the cheapest possible foreign Visa workers possible; Canada is Exporting this oil, Not the U.S. the pipeline is merely through our back yard, you honestly believe the Canadian Government will allow most of those jobs to go to American Workers? Man, have I got a Free Trade Agreement to sell ya...
So, you support closing the borders so that American jobs are not stolen by illegals. Didn't see that coming.
|
|
Isabeau
Location: sou' tex Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 5:24pm |
|
gypsyman wrote: 50 permanent positions where? After the build there are thousands of jobs to subcontractors for testing, maintenance, rebuilds. support, etc You really don't seem to understand....
And you are the height of naiveté if you believe those positions won't be filled by the cheapest possible foreign Visa workers possible; Canada is Exporting this oil, Not the U.S. the pipeline is merely through our back yard, you honestly believe the Canadian Government will allow most of those jobs to go to American Workers? Man, have I got a Free Trade Agreement to sell ya...
|
|
DD gypsyman
Location: Joined Nov 27, 2006 Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 5:16pm |
|
Isabeau wrote:The world's Global Oil Barons will NOT allow renewables to get a hold on in the U.S. if they can possibly purchase enough politicians. They are going to get every last bit of profit squeezed out of that last drop of Dinosaur Fuel before suddenly crying a need for other Alternatives. Regarding the controversial Keystone Pipleline: “Jobs created - stated by TransCanada's own Pipeline Application to the State Department - estimates 4,000 - 6,000 temporary jobs throughout construction and approximately 50 permanent positions when the project is finished." 50 might-be American jobs, to transport Canadian Tar sands oil to Port Arthur, TX for Higher Priced Export. Not to help America's oil supply or lower prices for Americans, but merely helping Canada's Oil Producers make more money. By the way, its already leaked 3 times - the last stopping the project for over 5 months. For 50 jobs but a risk to 23 Watersheds across 39 counties and 5 states? Nah. I'll pass. 50 permanent positions where? After the build there are thousands of jobs to subcontractors for testing, maintenance, rebuilds. support, etc You really don't seem to understand....
|
|
Isabeau
Location: sou' tex Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 3:47pm |
|
ScottN wrote: Can you say BP and Gulf of Mexico, or Valdez? These are just two of our worst domestic accidents. There many more World wide are many more too. Hardly "flowers being trampled on". Most estimates put our domestic reserves at 3-5 years current consumption of imported oil. It's deep, it's in fragile ecology, it's expensive and energy intensive to retrieve, thus not allowing an advantageous "net yield". We see our dope dealers until there is an alternate. Drilling and exploiting FULLY the arctic reserves buys us maybe two years, which hardly seems risk advantageous.
The world's Global Oil Barons will NOT allow renewables to get a hold on in the U.S. if they can possibly purchase enough politicians. They are going to get every last bit of profit squeezed out of that last drop of Dinosaur Fuel before suddenly crying a need for other Alternatives. Regarding the controversial Keystone Pipleline: “Jobs created - stated by TransCanada's own Pipeline Application to the State Department - estimates 4,000 - 6,000 temporary jobs throughout construction and approximately 50 permanent positions when the project is finished." 50 might-be American jobs, to transport Canadian Tar sands oil to Port Arthur, TX for Higher Priced Export. Not to help America's oil supply or lower prices for Americans, but merely helping Canada's Oil Producers make more money. By the way, its already leaked 3 times - the last stopping the project for over 5 months. For 50 jobs but a risk to 23 Watersheds across 39 counties and 5 states? Nah. I'll pass.
|
|
ScottN
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 3:26pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
You're right. We will not go round and round.
But I will say that your thinking on the matter is very narrow as you imply that we will never break free from oil, if we expand our domestic supply.
I see it as buying time and a bridge to something better and sooner than later. There is risk in everything. Yes some flowers will be trampled and spilled upon, but not as many as people like you want everyone to believe.
We have no viable alternative to oil yet and until we do, we beholden to our enemies and we finance them with our money when we buy their oil. As soon as alternative energy can be cost competitive without subsidies, it will be used and as widely as possible and as soon as possible. Of that I have no doubt. The more money we send overseas, the less we have to spend at home on research and development ... and yes, for for the liberals, government subsidies for R&D.
As Bill Maher once said (and its what got him kicked off of ABC) Israel is our girlfriend and Saudi Arabia is our dope dealer. Until that changes, we are fucked.
The choice is clear to me. But I'm in a vacuum, alone on this one as I mentioned above.
Can you say BP and Gulf of Mexico, or Valdez? These are just two of our worst domestic accidents. There many more World wide are many more too. Hardly "flowers being trampled on". Most estimates put our domestic reserves at 3-5 years current consumption of imported oil. It's deep, it's in fragile ecology, it's expensive and energy intensive to retrieve, thus not allowing an advantageous "net yield". We see our dope dealers until there is an alternate. Drilling and exploiting FULLY the arctic reserves buys us maybe two years, which hardly seems risk advantageous.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 2:54pm |
|
ScottN wrote: kurtster wrote: There are ways out, but no one in charge and few citizens are willing to do what it takes.
We can drill our way out, baby, and drill for peace at the same time. It was cheap and secure energy that made this country strong and the strongest in the first place. I could add to it, but no one is interested. Hydrocarbons are evil. It begins and ends right there.
And I am relaxed and unafraid.
What is the definition of insanity ?
What do we keep doing with the debt ceiling and expecting to happen everytime we raise it ?
Not going round and round w/ you on this controversial drilling subject. Many people say no, but even if yes, our reserves are not unlimited. Eco damage and other unintended consequences cannot credibly be denied. You're right. We will not go round and round. But I will say that your thinking on the matter is very narrow as you imply that we will never break free from oil, if we expamd our domestic supply. I see it as buying time and a bridge to something better and sooner than later. There is risk in everything. Yes some flowers will be trampled and spilled upon, but not as many as people like you want everyone to believe. We have no viable alternative to oil yet and until we do, we beholden to our enemies and we finance them with our money when we buy their oil. As soon as alternative energy can be cost competitive without subsidies, it will be used and as widely as possiblem and as soon as possible. Of that I have no doubt. The more money we send overseas, the less we have to spend at home on research and development ... and yes, for for the liberals, government subsidies for R&D. As Bill Maher once said (and its what got him kicked off of ABC) Israel is our girlfriend and Saudi Arabia is our dope dealer. Until that changes, we are fucked. The choice is clear to me. But I'm in a vacuum, alone on this one as I mentioned above.
|
|
ScottN
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 2:35pm |
|
kurtster wrote: There are ways out, but no one in charge and few citizens are willing to do what it takes.
We can drill our way out, baby, and drill for peace at the same time. It was cheap and secure energy that made this country strong and the strongest in the first place. I could add to it, but no one is interested. Hydrocarbons are evil. It begins and ends right there.
And I am relaxed and unafraid.
What is the definition of insanity ?
What do we keep doing with the debt ceiling and expecting to happen everytime we raise it ?
Not going round and round w/ you on this controversial drilling subject. Many people say no, but even if yes, our reserves are not unlimited. Eco damage and other unintended consequences cannot credibly be denied.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 9, 2013 - 1:58pm |
|
ScottN wrote: kurtster wrote:.... I am not convinced that default is a horrible thing. Yes, there a few people...a very few (relative to the population that actually thinks about this) who believe as you do. I prefer to defer my opinion to such organizations as the World Bank, The EU, Wall Street, and many, many professional financial folk who have said that failure to raise the "debt ceiling" would be various degrees of catastrophic. Add the default to a government that is not nearly fully staffed to deal with it...well, relax Kurt. There are ways out, but no one in charge and few citizens are willing to do what it takes. We can drill our way out, baby, and drill for peace at the same time. It was cheap and secure energy that made this country strong and the strongest in the first place. I could add to it, but no one is interested. Hydrocarbons are evil. It begins and ends right there. And I am relaxed and unafraid. What is the definition of insanity ? What do we keep doing with the debt ceiling and expecting to happen everytime we raise it ?
|
|
|