[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - May 23, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Odd sayings - ScottFromWyoming - May 23, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - May 23, 2024 - 2:48pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - May 23, 2024 - 2:20pm
 
Fascism In America - R_P - May 23, 2024 - 1:23pm
 
Israel - R_P - May 23, 2024 - 12:25pm
 
Wordle - daily game - Steely_D - May 23, 2024 - 11:44am
 
NY Times Strands - rgio - May 23, 2024 - 11:39am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - May 23, 2024 - 11:02am
 
It's the economy stupid. - R_P - May 23, 2024 - 10:57am
 
Nederland / The Netherlands - R_P - May 23, 2024 - 10:03am
 
Music News - Beaker - May 23, 2024 - 8:30am
 
Interviews with the artists - Beaker - May 23, 2024 - 8:12am
 
NYTimes Connections - ScottFromWyoming - May 23, 2024 - 7:24am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - May 23, 2024 - 5:06am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 23, 2024 - 3:39am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 22, 2024 - 8:51pm
 
Science is bullsh*t - GeneP59 - May 22, 2024 - 4:16pm
 
Maarjamaa - oldviolin - May 22, 2024 - 3:32pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - ScottFromWyoming - May 22, 2024 - 3:25pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - jarro - May 22, 2024 - 11:19am
 
New Music - R_P - May 22, 2024 - 9:18am
 
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful - Isabeau - May 22, 2024 - 7:56am
 
Trump - rgio - May 22, 2024 - 4:44am
 
Coffee - haresfur - May 22, 2024 - 12:12am
 
Rock mix sound quality below Main and Mellow? - theirongiant - May 21, 2024 - 2:23pm
 
Most played: what's the range? Last 30 days? 90? - theirongiant - May 21, 2024 - 2:20pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - May 21, 2024 - 11:59am
 
Name My Band - Isabeau - May 21, 2024 - 10:27am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Isabeau - May 20, 2024 - 2:16pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Steely_D - May 20, 2024 - 1:24pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - May 20, 2024 - 12:00pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - May 20, 2024 - 7:50am
 
Shawn Phillips - Isabeau - May 20, 2024 - 6:20am
 
The Corporation - Red_Dragon - May 20, 2024 - 5:08am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - GeneP59 - May 19, 2024 - 4:08pm
 
What can you hear right now? - GeneP59 - May 19, 2024 - 4:07pm
 
China - Isabeau - May 19, 2024 - 2:22pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Isabeau - May 19, 2024 - 2:18pm
 
TV shows you watch - Steely_D - May 19, 2024 - 1:13am
 
Music library - nightdrive - May 18, 2024 - 1:28pm
 
The Obituary Page - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 18, 2024 - 4:18am
 
Paul McCartney - miamizsun - May 18, 2024 - 4:06am
 
Virginia News - Steely_D - May 18, 2024 - 2:51am
 
Gnomad here. Who farking deleted my thread? - Red_Dragon - May 17, 2024 - 5:59pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - May 17, 2024 - 4:04pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - ScottFromWyoming - May 17, 2024 - 1:43pm
 
DIY - black321 - May 17, 2024 - 9:16am
 
Other Medical Stuff - kurtster - May 16, 2024 - 10:00pm
 
Your Local News - Proclivities - May 16, 2024 - 12:51pm
 
Alexa Show - thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 12:15pm
 
Joe Biden - Steely_D - May 16, 2024 - 1:02am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:13pm
 
how do you feel right now? - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:10pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 12:38pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 11:50am
 
NASA & other news from space - Beaker - May 15, 2024 - 9:29am
 
Artificial Intelligence - thisbody - May 15, 2024 - 8:25am
 
Human Rights (Can Science Point The Way) - miamizsun - May 15, 2024 - 5:50am
 
Play the Blues - Steely_D - May 15, 2024 - 1:50am
 
Animal Resistance - R_P - May 14, 2024 - 6:37pm
 
2024 Elections! - R_P - May 14, 2024 - 6:00pm
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - thisbody - May 14, 2024 - 1:27pm
 
Social Media Are Changing Everything - Red_Dragon - May 14, 2024 - 8:08am
 
Internet connection - ai63 - May 14, 2024 - 7:53am
 
Congress - Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:22pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - May 13, 2024 - 5:50pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 1:25pm
 
Surfing! - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 13, 2024 - 1:21pm
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 11:38am
 
See This Film - Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:35am
 
Podcast recommendations??? - ColdMiser - May 13, 2024 - 7:50am
 
News of the Weird - Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 5:05am
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - May 12, 2024 - 11:31am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - May 12, 2024 - 9:16am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Sex Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 164, 165, 166  Next
Post to this Topic
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:45am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Depends on your local laws, I think.

 


What if he doesn't use adult diapers? Not sexually, anyway.
Zep

Zep Avatar

Location: Funkytown


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:44am

 hippiechick wrote:
People this is sex
.....
You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference
 
My corp firewall is blocking those, and for that, perhaps I should feel grateful.
 
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:42am

 winter wrote:

Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?

 
Depends on your local laws, I think.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:41am

 winter wrote:

Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?

 

As your attorney I advise you, yes. 
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:33am

 sirdroseph wrote:


Quite.

 


Say, if I tip a sex worker after he performs for a potential client, is that deductible as a business expense?
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:30am

 winter wrote:

Yes.

 

Quite.
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:27am

 oldslabsides wrote:


indeed.

 


Yes.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:26am

 winter wrote:

Tax policy is weird.

 

indeed.
winter

winter Avatar

Location: in exile, as always
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 9:22am

 Lazy8 wrote:
 oldslabsides wrote:
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.
 


Tax policy is weird.
hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:41am

People this is sex



This is not



You may feel like you're getting fucked, but there is definitely a difference
Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:37am

 oldslabsides wrote:
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

It goes the other way too: a two-earner household can pay higher rates married than single because they get bumped to a higher bracket (the "marriage penalty"). With one earner making substantially more than the other it works the other way.

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:34am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
 
If you want to talk taxes, go find another thread. Marriage has nothing to do with sex (all too often, unfortunately). But I think someone here doesn't know that.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:30am

 sirdroseph wrote:


According to the GOP, that time is now.{#Rolleyes}

 
Well, some people...

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:29am

 oldslabsides wrote:

Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.
 

According to the GOP, that time is now.{#Rolleyes}
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:26am

 rosedraws wrote:

Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?
 
Those particular tax laws probably date to a time when marriage was considered something the state had a "compelling interest" in because the morality of the day stipulated that only married couples could breed.  It's an example not only of legislating morality but of social engineering via taxation.

Alexandra

Alexandra Avatar

Location: PNW
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:15am

 rosedraws wrote:

Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?


 

Maybe the conservatives (who are religious) feel better about people not living in "sin?"   {#Ask} Good question.
rosedraws

rosedraws Avatar

Location: close to the edge
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am

 Alexandra wrote:


I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.

/2 cents

 
Just yesterday I was talking with my business partner about marrying her life partner of 15+ years.  They didn't want to get married, they feel committed enough without the paper.  But we opened up the Turbo Tax, and plugged in the numbers comparing filing separately as singles, and filing jointly as a married couple.  Their tax savings were at least $2,000 per year.

Then we started wondering why the government would offer incentives for marriage?  What's in it for them?

Alexandra

Alexandra Avatar

Location: PNW
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:13am

 buzz wrote:

maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.

 

I agree, but shit does happen sometimes, even if they do. I dodged two bullets in the past. If I'd married them, I'd probably be divorced now. It really does pay (literally) to be picky. {#Lol}


oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:12am

 buzz wrote:

maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.

 

Thanks. I'll remember that next time around.


buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Jul 12, 2011 - 8:11am

 Alexandra wrote:


I often think to myself that some people should just live together and quit making it legal. All they do is make attorneys rich. I also think (and I know this sounds horrible) that if people do have marriages, there can be renewal period every 5 years to stay or go without any legals becoming involved. That is just the nature of marriage these days...many people settle/choose too quickly....or a partner changes drastically on them...or worse things....and then find that they really don't want to have to pay for the mistake with the rest of their lives. If the "for life" stigma/burden is removed, maybe it would be easier for people to decide to find happiness.

/2 cents

 
maybe people should think a little longer and harder before making a commitment.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 164, 165, 166  Next