[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Impeachment Time: - steeler - Jan 26, 2020 - 5:08pm
 
Trump - kcar - Jan 26, 2020 - 4:51pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jan 26, 2020 - 4:08pm
 
Edward Norton's Neo-Noir film Motherless Brooklyn. - SeriousLee - Jan 26, 2020 - 3:23pm
 
What are you listening to now? - Steely_D - Jan 26, 2020 - 3:10pm
 
The Chomsky / Zinn Reader - R_P - Jan 26, 2020 - 2:02pm
 
The Obituary Page - SeriousLee - Jan 26, 2020 - 12:41pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - SeriousLee - Jan 26, 2020 - 10:51am
 
Pandemics and Rights - miamizsun - Jan 26, 2020 - 7:39am
 
Ask the Libertarian - Lazy8 - Jan 26, 2020 - 7:14am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jan 26, 2020 - 7:03am
 
Yamaha Musiccast - ilveroluca - Jan 26, 2020 - 6:11am
 
Things that make you cautiously optimistic - miamizsun - Jan 26, 2020 - 6:04am
 
Stream Stopping - Multiple Platforms - ilveroluca - Jan 26, 2020 - 5:58am
 
Neil Young - R_P - Jan 25, 2020 - 6:26pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Jan 25, 2020 - 4:41pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - Red_Dragon - Jan 25, 2020 - 4:34pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Chuck1 - Jan 25, 2020 - 4:25pm
 
Official date for our 20th Anniversary? - buddy - Jan 25, 2020 - 1:10pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Jan 25, 2020 - 12:38pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Jan 25, 2020 - 11:57am
 
Brazil - R_P - Jan 25, 2020 - 11:18am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - SeriousLee - Jan 25, 2020 - 10:42am
 
Mars - R_P - Jan 25, 2020 - 10:27am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - SeriousLee - Jan 25, 2020 - 9:42am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - SeriousLee - Jan 25, 2020 - 9:39am
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Jan 25, 2020 - 12:09am
 
Name My Band - Red_Dragon - Jan 24, 2020 - 7:46pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Jan 24, 2020 - 7:29pm
 
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet - gvajda - Jan 24, 2020 - 5:54pm
 
Way Cool Video - Red_Dragon - Jan 24, 2020 - 5:22pm
 
Automotive Lust - Red_Dragon - Jan 24, 2020 - 5:09pm
 
We need some new car names - jahgirl8 - Jan 24, 2020 - 4:00pm
 
how do you feel right now? - Antigone - Jan 24, 2020 - 2:38pm
 
Iran - jahgirl8 - Jan 24, 2020 - 2:32pm
 
THREE WORDS - jahgirl8 - Jan 24, 2020 - 2:27pm
 
A motivational quote - jahgirl8 - Jan 24, 2020 - 2:23pm
 
Interesting Art - Proclivities - Jan 24, 2020 - 1:36pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Jan 24, 2020 - 11:23am
 
Economix - R_P - Jan 24, 2020 - 10:49am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Jan 24, 2020 - 10:10am
 
Acting - R_P - Jan 24, 2020 - 9:55am
 
Graphs, Charts & Maps - black321 - Jan 24, 2020 - 9:44am
 
Strange & Cool Music - Proclivities - Jan 24, 2020 - 9:32am
 
Animal Resistance - cc_rider - Jan 24, 2020 - 9:15am
 
Recommended documentaries - cc_rider - Jan 24, 2020 - 9:05am
 
Documentaries - Proclivities - Jan 24, 2020 - 6:39am
 
Florida - miamizsun - Jan 24, 2020 - 5:31am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Jan 24, 2020 - 2:48am
 
Croatia - EdSe - Jan 24, 2020 - 12:06am
 
Bad News / Good News - haresfur - Jan 23, 2020 - 4:11pm
 
Music News - miamizsun - Jan 23, 2020 - 3:28pm
 
WTF??!! - Antigone - Jan 23, 2020 - 3:04pm
 
The war on funk is over! - Ohmsen - Jan 23, 2020 - 12:59pm
 
Jazz - Ohmsen - Jan 23, 2020 - 12:41pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Ohmsen - Jan 23, 2020 - 12:23pm
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - Ohmsen - Jan 23, 2020 - 12:21pm
 
SFW & Gluttony Pants - Proclivities - Jan 23, 2020 - 9:23am
 
songs that ROCK! - sirdroseph - Jan 23, 2020 - 7:05am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Jan 23, 2020 - 3:53am
 
Your app for Mac needs an update - gtufano - Jan 22, 2020 - 11:36pm
 
RP and Sonos - jarro - Jan 22, 2020 - 5:04pm
 
What Do You Want From RP? - buddy - Jan 22, 2020 - 2:53pm
 
Movie Quote - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 22, 2020 - 10:32am
 
A Sad Day, Indeed - ScottFromWyoming - Jan 22, 2020 - 7:09am
 
Goodnight everyone! - Proclivities - Jan 22, 2020 - 4:06am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Egctheow - Jan 22, 2020 - 1:14am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - BlueHeronDruid - Jan 21, 2020 - 11:33pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jan 21, 2020 - 10:37pm
 
ONE WORD - buddy - Jan 21, 2020 - 9:24pm
 
Internet Addict?? - BlueHeronDruid - Jan 21, 2020 - 7:09pm
 
The Global War on Terror - R_P - Jan 21, 2020 - 3:54pm
 
What Did You See Today? - oldviolin - Jan 21, 2020 - 2:34pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Jan 21, 2020 - 2:26pm
 
A History of Violence - R_P - Jan 21, 2020 - 12:09pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Republican Party Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 195, 196, 197  Next
Post to this Topic
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jan 11, 2020 - 9:43am

MITCH MCCONNELL RECEIVED DONATIONS FROM VOTING MACHINE LOBBYISTS BEFORE BLOCKING ELECTION SECURITY BILLS
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2019 - 9:04am

 Proclivities wrote: 
was it another politician?

because if it was...
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Dec 20, 2019 - 1:34pm



 Proclivities wrote:
 
Bevin's justification: There was no physical evidence of abuse and the girl's hymen was "intact."


Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 20, 2019 - 1:27pm


From another article:

"..Let's just add one more horror: Now that he's a free man with a clean record, Micah Schoettle — who was convicted of raping a little girl multiple times over two years, starting when she was nine — doesn't have to register as a sex offender, and can apply to have his record expunged, because Matt Bevin has a medieval understanding of medicine."

Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 18, 2019 - 7:41am



 haresfur wrote:


 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

If that's what he's willing to give up for free, think about what Parnas is holding in reserve 
 


Yes!!   Why is Mitch McConnell Afraid of This Man?

Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Dec 18, 2019 - 7:37am



 kurtster wrote:
Dossier, Dossier, Dossier !!!! Â©
 

Squirrel! Squirrel! Squirrel!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 11, 2019 - 9:23pm

Dossier, Dossier, Dossier !!!! ©
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Dec 11, 2019 - 5:23pm

The GOP Is Now The Party Of Putin
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 22, 2019 - 9:55pm



 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

If that's what he's willing to give up for free, think about what Parnas is holding in reserve 
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 22, 2019 - 9:40pm



 Red_Dragon wrote:
 

I think Elmore Leonard wrote this book.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Nov 22, 2019 - 9:03pm

Exclusive: Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden
Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 1:18pm



 black321 wrote:


 Isabeau wrote:


 black321 wrote:


 
 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

 

 

I personally dont like them...but thats the usual response to excuse his behavior. 
 
I'm truly grateful, after all these years, for being able to legitimately post the 'moon' emoticon to a post.  I can die now.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: A sunset in the desert
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 10:50am



 Isabeau wrote:


 black321 wrote:


 
 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

 

 

I personally dont like them...but thats the usual response to excuse his behavior. 
Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 10:35am



 black321 wrote:


 
 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

 



black321

black321 Avatar

Location: A sunset in the desert
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 8:35am



 Isabeau wrote:


 KarmaKarma wrote:
 
So you support a porn star payoff lie, going limp in front of Putin at Helsinki, the adolescent name-calling, the misogyny, the vitriol thrown about at the rallies, Trump's ignorance regarding Frederick Douglass and the boundaries of Colorado, the magic marker hurricane path, the making fun of a disabled reporter, the comment of "shithole" countries, family nepotism in his administration, a skeleton 'acting' cabinet where people are leaving in droves, screwing over farmers, not bringing back manufacturing or coal jobs (auto plants are still closing), the Trump businesses and hotels making money via the presidency and state visits, and the desertion of our allies in Syria? 


No defense of the indefensible, so here comes the squirrel pointing to Hillary or Obama, in 3, 2, 1 ...

 
OK, but i like his policies. Ha!

Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 6:59am



 KarmaKarma wrote:
 
So you support a porn star payoff lie, going limp in front of Putin at Helsinki, the adolescent name-calling, the misogyny, the vitriol thrown about at the rallies, Trump's ignorance regarding Frederick Douglass and the boundaries of Colorado, the magic marker hurricane path, the making fun of a disabled reporter, the comment of "shithole" countries, family nepotism in his administration, a skeleton 'acting' cabinet where people are leaving in droves, screwing over farmers, not bringing back manufacturing or coal jobs (auto plants are still closing), the Trump businesses and hotels making money via the presidency and state visits, and the desertion of our allies in Syria? 


No defense of the indefensible, so here comes the squirrel pointing to Hillary or Obama, in 3, 2, 1 ...

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 11, 2019 - 4:02am



 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:
Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option.

Allow me to clarify: he took the only course available that would expose the problem.

He could also have done what everyone else in his position had done: collect his paycheck and keep his mouth shut. Yes, that's an option, but not one his conscience could abide.

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.

There's no comparison. Trump's whistleblower had a majority in the House looking for anything—anything at all—to throw at Trump. He knew he'd get a friendly reception and get offered what protection they could deliver. Snowden had no such allies.

Yes, they're both patriots and deserve our thanks, but the risks Snowden took and the consequences he faces are far worse.
 

That's how I sees it though the motivation and background of the whistle blower will be met with much suspicion if nothing comes from it.  Now if Trump really did commit an impeachable offense, then it is moot, the whistle blower did a great service to our country regardless of motivation.  We shall see.  Maybe we are all not considering a completely different angle here in the big picture.  Is Trump's master plan to pull the curtain off of everything and pull everyone down with him?  The way things are going looks like in Washington, "they are all going to die a little in that war."   Both parties look bad and will be badly damaged when the dust is cleared on this one and I for one think this is ultimately a good thing for our country.   Will Trump's legacy be that he was the domino that set forth the eventual demise of the two party duopoly as we know it?

KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Nov 10, 2019 - 4:18pm

 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:
Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option.

Allow me to clarify: he took the only course available that would expose the problem.

He could also have done what everyone else in his position had done: collect his paycheck and keep his mouth shut. Yes, that's an option, but not one his conscience could abide.

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.

There's no comparison. Trump's whistleblower had a majority in the House looking for anything—anything at all—to throw at Trump. He knew he'd get a friendly reception and get offered what protection they could deliver. Snowden had no such allies.

Yes, they're both patriots and deserve our thanks, but the risks Snowden took and the consequences he faces are far worse.
 
Trump's "whistleblower" will be yet another failed attempt by the Dems to skewer Trump.  This so-called whistle-blower is a gross fraud in itself, being lapped up by culpable and colluding senior officials of an opposition party that is all-in on trying anything, anything at all, to take out Trump.  That this person is a fraud, is obvious to those who have been provided all the facts.  That would be those who do NOT watch MSDNC, CNN, & other blatantly biased sources.  They will fail. Again.  And in doing so, will set the bar for malicious prosecutions once again so low that future political and law courses will study the damage their actions have done to society - and the political process.  Not to mention the precedent they have set that will no doubt be used against them.  Dems have not yet met a rake they don't like ... stepping on.  The idiot party.  Truly. Don't Dem voters ever get tired of getting sold yet another pack of lies and false hopes by the fraudulent media malpracticers?   Asking for a friend.

As for Snowden, he deserves nothing less than a short rope and a long drop.  Only in this country are we willing to allow such wanton destruction of national secrets and call it "whistleblowing".  Had Snowden done this while working on behalf of a less democratic nation, say, oh, China, he would have been seized and disappeared long ago.  The only thing keeping him above ground now is his high profile and name recognition. He's already worn out his welcome elsewhere on this planet, and has apparently voiced the idea that he'd like to come home and face the consequences.  

2013: The damage done by Snowden's Treason
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/snowdens-treason-9020

A comment from a Sept 13-2019 article: "Snowden said it helped that Russia viewed him as useful publicity." 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2019/sep/13/edward-snowden-interview-whistleblowing-russia-ai-permanent-record
Snowden misunderstood.  Russia, and others (like China) view him as a useful idiot.  Big difference.

Killing this treasonous shitstain now would be of questionable value. It might light aflame again the news cycle of damaging stories and give the rabble something more to rabble-on about.  It would also give kooks like Bernie Three Sheds more ammo to spew in his delusional quest to be relevant.  

About the only good that could come of killing Snowden now would be to serve as a warning to others what fate awaits them.  Of course... this country was not the only one harmed by Snowden's treasonous revelations.  Another country, with sufficient interest, or willingness, to do the work that needs to be done on the very unofficial behest of .... well, there you go.  Plausible deniability.

But wtf do I, a stupid deplorable from flyover country know. 

It's voters and commentators like blue checkmark Kyle here, who are setting the tone for the American future.  God help us.





Wikipedia: "Kyle Edward Kulinski is an American political commentator, and the co-founder of Justice Democrats. He is the host and producer of The Kyle Kulinski Show on his channel Secular Talk, an affiliate of The Young Turks network. He is a social democrat, and a registered Democrat in New York state. "




Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 10, 2019 - 10:17am

islander wrote:
Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option.

Allow me to clarify: he took the only course available that would expose the problem.

He could also have done what everyone else in his position had done: collect his paycheck and keep his mouth shut. Yes, that's an option, but not one his conscience could abide.

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.

There's no comparison. Trump's whistleblower had a majority in the House looking for anything—anything at all—to throw at Trump. He knew he'd get a friendly reception and get offered what protection they could deliver. Snowden had no such allies.

Yes, they're both patriots and deserve our thanks, but the risks Snowden took and the consequences he faces are far worse.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Nov 10, 2019 - 7:50am



 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:
So yes there is a little ambiguity. But it's also clear that he had options. I can understand his reluctance to use them, and I can see the reasoning he came up with for his actions. But it strains credibility to say that protections simply don't cover contractors, or that he had no other options.

The law should protect me, and maybe it does, but I know that the administration in power and its current rivals for power will use every tool at their disposal to crush me like a bug. If I go thru legal channels here's what I can expect:

1. I'm reporting a crime to the people who committed it or the people who funded and authorized it. My complaint will never reach the ears of anyone inclined to stop it.

2. Those people will retaliate...harshly. At very least, assuming they stick to the letter of the law, the NSA will find a pretext to cancel the contract with the company I work for and I'll be out of a job, but still forbidden to disclose what was happening...and would continue to happen.

3. Let's say I decide to fight that retaliation under the whistleblower statute. The evidence I need for my defense is classified and I won't be given access to it. If I have the resources to appeal my case all the way to the Supreme Court I might eventually prevail, but the people responsible will suffer no consequences at all.

Options? Yeah, he had options, but all but the one he chose would silence him and the crimes he exposed would continue. He did the right thing.

Yes on all 3 counts. But your last statement is pure speculation.  The original question was whether the whistle blower rules/protections  applied equally to .gov employees and contractors. The answer is not completely clear,  but generally accepted as Yes. Snowden used a 'no' answer to justify his actions. I don't necessarily disagree with his reasoning, but I'm happy he took his course of action. It is still not correct to say he had no other option. 

Leaving aside the employee/contractor question, the current whistle blower faced all the same challenges you listed above. Yet he took a different course of action.  He faced the same 3 challenges that you listed above.  I think you can say he is facing a lot of challenges, but the fact that we are all here discussing it pretty much means that he wasn't (effectively) silenced. As to whether or not the crimes will continue - we have yet to see.   Also, I'd say both Snowden and the current WB di the right thing, and I'd call them both patriots.


Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 195, 196, 197  Next