[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Feb 22, 2020 - 2:17pm
 
Local Scandals, politics and news - R_P - Feb 22, 2020 - 1:58pm
 
New Music - R_P - Feb 22, 2020 - 1:16pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Feb 22, 2020 - 1:13pm
 
Bernie Sanders - sirdroseph - Feb 22, 2020 - 12:36pm
 
Favourite Movie Scene - sirdroseph - Feb 22, 2020 - 9:17am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Feb 22, 2020 - 9:06am
 
What makes you smile? - triskele - Feb 22, 2020 - 6:43am
 
Play the Blues - sirdroseph - Feb 22, 2020 - 6:08am
 
Baseball, anyone? - zevon - Feb 22, 2020 - 5:05am
 
What are you listening to now? - kcar - Feb 21, 2020 - 9:36pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Feb 21, 2020 - 8:02pm
 
Florida - Ohmsen - Feb 21, 2020 - 5:55pm
 
Show us your NEW _______________!!!! - Antigone - Feb 21, 2020 - 5:44pm
 
Bad News / Good News - haresfur - Feb 21, 2020 - 5:12pm
 
Iran - R_P - Feb 21, 2020 - 4:29pm
 
Thanks to BillG & Rebecca! - hayduke2 - Feb 21, 2020 - 3:13pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - miamizsun - Feb 21, 2020 - 2:45pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Feb 21, 2020 - 2:24pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Feb 21, 2020 - 1:59pm
 
Happy RP Anniversary! - the_jake - Feb 21, 2020 - 1:43pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Feb 21, 2020 - 1:35pm
 
Sonos - jarro - Feb 21, 2020 - 1:29pm
 
Live Music - Ohmsen - Feb 21, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Feb 21, 2020 - 11:51am
 
songs that ROCK! - Ohmsen - Feb 21, 2020 - 11:30am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - rmgman - Feb 21, 2020 - 11:24am
 
Make Scott laugh - Red_Dragon - Feb 21, 2020 - 10:22am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Feb 21, 2020 - 8:25am
 
Democratic Party - ColdMiser - Feb 21, 2020 - 7:21am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - ColdMiser - Feb 21, 2020 - 7:07am
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Feb 20, 2020 - 4:17pm
 
Family Ties - Manbird - Feb 20, 2020 - 4:02pm
 
Irony 101 - Manbird - Feb 20, 2020 - 1:21pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - Manbird - Feb 20, 2020 - 1:18pm
 
Tech & Science - dischuckin - Feb 20, 2020 - 12:02pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Red_Dragon - Feb 20, 2020 - 10:36am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Feb 20, 2020 - 9:59am
 
President Elizabeth Warren - cc_rider - Feb 20, 2020 - 9:03am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Feb 20, 2020 - 8:53am
 
Ridiculously easy things to do - miamizsun - Feb 20, 2020 - 5:08am
 
Automotive Lust - miamizsun - Feb 20, 2020 - 4:11am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - BillG - Feb 19, 2020 - 6:04pm
 
The House I Want (Today) - Antigone - Feb 19, 2020 - 4:05pm
 
Canada - westslope - Feb 19, 2020 - 1:38pm
 
WikiLeaks - R_P - Feb 19, 2020 - 11:55am
 
Military Matters - R_P - Feb 19, 2020 - 11:39am
 
Sweet horrible irony. - Steely_D - Feb 19, 2020 - 10:05am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 19, 2020 - 8:19am
 
Celebrity Face Recognition - Proclivities - Feb 19, 2020 - 7:18am
 
Need A Thread Killed? - Coaxial - Feb 19, 2020 - 6:49am
 
You might be getting old if...... - Coaxial - Feb 19, 2020 - 6:47am
 
Things You Thought Today - sirdroseph - Feb 19, 2020 - 4:47am
 
The Obituary Page - R_P - Feb 18, 2020 - 8:57pm
 
Preferred media player? - westslope - Feb 18, 2020 - 7:48pm
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Steely_D - Feb 18, 2020 - 7:22pm
 
Cuba - R_P - Feb 18, 2020 - 4:40pm
 
Israel - R_P - Feb 18, 2020 - 4:21pm
 
Venezuela - miamizsun - Feb 18, 2020 - 4:05pm
 
Health Care Reform - miamizsun - Feb 18, 2020 - 4:02pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - BlueHeronDruid - Feb 18, 2020 - 3:13pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - haresfur - Feb 18, 2020 - 2:31pm
 
Drinking Establishments - miamizsun - Feb 18, 2020 - 2:28pm
 
Maps • Google • GeoGuessr - haresfur - Feb 18, 2020 - 2:16pm
 
Squirrel proof bird feeder? - miamizsun - Feb 18, 2020 - 2:09pm
 
Logos for alt streams? - miamizsun - Feb 18, 2020 - 2:07pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - miamizsun - Feb 18, 2020 - 7:54am
 
RP 20th anniversary, Feb 2020 - sunybuny - Feb 18, 2020 - 5:43am
 
Recommended documentaries - sirdroseph - Feb 18, 2020 - 5:21am
 
Reviews and Pix from your concerts and shows you couldn't... - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 17, 2020 - 6:43pm
 
how do you feel right now? - GeneP59 - Feb 17, 2020 - 4:08pm
 
Google Home - jarro - Feb 16, 2020 - 1:00pm
 
Back to the 90's - R_P - Feb 15, 2020 - 7:34pm
 
March Of The Locusts - R_P - Feb 15, 2020 - 3:31pm
 
Health Care - R_P - Feb 15, 2020 - 2:29pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » I'm a Dem. Which Republican would you recommend I vote for? Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Post to this Topic
jahgirl8

jahgirl8 Avatar



Posted: Jan 15, 2020 - 8:36pm



 FooledAgain wrote:

Shouldn't the Y be blue?

 
YES

maryte

maryte Avatar

Location: Blinding You With Library Science!
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 21, 2012 - 8:28pm

 LordBaltimore wrote:

Well, Jon Huntsman is much more pro-life than Ron Paul is.  Huntsman is in favor of a federal "right-to-life" amendment that would be enforced at the federal level.  Paul is not.  So Rose, I'm sorry you voted for the most pro-life GOP candidate outside of perhaps Santorum.  

I do disagree with Paul on this issue and am strongly pro-choice.  But you have to look at the probabilities — what is Paul more able to accomplish, stopping war or stopping abortion?  As commander in chief, the former, by far!  

Look, among republicans the only candidate more pro-CHOICE than Paul is possibly Mitt Romney, but Mitt Romney will do and say anything to get elected so I don't really believe any of his past actions or statements.  All the others are explicitly more pro-life.  If you can vote in a GOP primary, I'd strongly advise voting for Paul...why not do that now, and then you can vote for Obama against him if you really are a single issue pro-choice voter.  

The media need to stop portraying Huntsman as a moderate and Paul an extremist.  Huntsman is "moderate" on far fewer issues than Paul is.  He's more extreme on abortion, on the NDAA, on the federal government's power, bombing Iran, and on the drug war (the real moderate position on the drug war is to stop jailing nonviolent "offenders").  I don't mind Huntsman, and yes he is a distant second to Paul among the rest of the GOP candidates, but let's be real about the guy.

 

Here's the difference: those other candidates are Republicans - I full well expect them to have those policy positions. Although Ron Paul is running under the *banner* of the Republicans, he professes to be a Libertarian. He can't have it both ways, although he has attempted to do so for years. He is NO Republican.  He is NO Libertarian.
GeneP59

GeneP59 Avatar

Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday.
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 16, 2012 - 8:47pm


Lincoln!
FooledAgain

FooledAgain Avatar

Location: 43°40'N 79°20'W
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 4:34pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yes, the more and more I study the positions of all the candidates, the more and more I have decided to stop all this calculating of who is the most electable and if I vote for this guy who will it hurt and what not. I am just going to vote for the person that reflects my viewpoints on the issues and the hell with it!

                                                       GARY JOHNSON 2012

 
Shouldn't the Y be blue?

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 8:22am

 LordBaltimore wrote:

That's fine, just remember Johnson is a bit of a wash compared to Paul in my view.  He's more hawkish and not quite as good on ending the drug war or protecting civil liberties.  He wants to legalize marijuana and that's great.  But he only wants to "decriminalize" other drugs, and I'm not sure what that means.  

I do agree he is more liberal/libertarian than Paul on abortion, immigration, and gay marriage.  

 
It is all about personal priorities, I am extremely socially liberal especially in matters of individual freedoms and what happens in our bedrooms so Paul is a turnoff to me in that respect. I am only concerned about Marijuana in relation to the drug war and am perfectly content on the war against illicit drugs (cocaine, meth, heroin and so forth) which have absolutely no benefit to society and do tremendous harm (alcohol is on the fence with me because so many cannot use it responsibly). I do not think illicit drugs can be completely eradicated, but freeing up the tremendous resources presently consumed stopping Canibus use and distribution should allow for us to keep them under control not to mention freeing us all to use evolution's greatest gift to humanity with complete freedom.{#Cowboy} 

Edit: read this back to myself and noticed the frequent use of variations of the word "Freedom". Quite revealing in a Freudian kind of way of what is important to me.

LordBaltimore

LordBaltimore Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 8:05am

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yes but the beauty of all that is that only we, the sheeple can affect that change and make it happen. The guns are not pointed at our heads disallowing a break from the parties.......yet. We still have a choice and I, for one am going to make it.
 
That's fine, just remember Johnson is a bit of a wash compared to Paul in my view.  He's more hawkish and not quite as good on ending the drug war or protecting civil liberties.  He wants to legalize marijuana and that's great.  But he only wants to "decriminalize" other drugs, and I'm not sure what that means.  

I do agree he is more liberal/libertarian than Paul on abortion, immigration, and gay marriage.  

If Paul does get the GOP nomination or runs as some unaffiliated independent, I'd love to see him and Gary debate.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 7:29am

 LordBaltimore wrote:

Fair enough.  I like Gary a lot, maybe even more than Paul though I disagree with his "FairTax," and he supports Gitmo.  He got royally screwed in the GOP debates, no doubt.  But realistically Johnson is going to have a very hard time running as a 3rd party.  He'd actually have better odds staying in the GOP and hoping the other candidates become physically incapacitated or melt down.  

Unfortunately, 3rd parties are pariahs in the US.  I'd love to see a viable 3rd party here, but the establishment and the media just hate them and are out to destroy 3rd parties.  The US is not a true democracy or even a very good representative democracy.  There's too much of a mentality here that 3rd parties are nothing but "spoilers" — they are viewed in a negative light instead of a positive angle.  

 
Yes but the beauty of all that is that only we, the sheeple can affect that change and make it happen. The guns are not pointed at our heads disallowing a break from the parties.......yet. We still have a choice and I, for one am going to make it.

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 7:22am

 LordBaltimore wrote:
Abortion has been the "white whale" of Republicans ever since Roe v. Wade.  Nobody can catch it or stop it.  If Reagan, Nixon, Ford, Newt Gingrich, and both George Bushes (the younger GWB having both branches of Congress to the GOP by the way) weren't able to eliminate abortion, Ron Paul certainly isn't going to accomplish it.  

 
That's because even the overwhelming majority of Catholic women in this country use some form of contraception.

LordBaltimore

LordBaltimore Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 7:12am

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yes, the more and more I study the positions of all the candidates, the more and more I have decided to stop all this calculating of who is the most electable and if I vote for this guy who will it hurt and what not. I am just going to vote for the person that reflects my viewpoints on the issues and the hell with it!

                                                       GARY JOHNSON 2012
 
Fair enough.  I like Gary a lot, maybe even more than Paul though I disagree with his "FairTax," and he supports Gitmo.  He got royally screwed in the GOP debates, no doubt.  But realistically Johnson is going to have a very hard time running as a 3rd party.  He'd actually have better odds staying in the GOP and hoping the other candidates become physically incapacitated or melt down.  

Unfortunately, 3rd parties are pariahs in the US.  I'd love to see a viable 3rd party here, but the establishment and the media just hate them and are out to destroy 3rd parties.  The US is not a true democracy or even a very good representative democracy.  There's too much of a mentality here that 3rd parties are nothing but "spoilers" — they are viewed in a negative light instead of a positive angle.  


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 7:07am

 LordBaltimore wrote:
Oh, Huntsman also believes in a border fence, and Paul doesn't.  Again, Huntsman is more EXTREME on immigration than Dr. Paul is but the media still thinks of him as the moderate.  

Huntsman also wants to get rid of the mortgage interest tax deduction, and he supports means testing for social security.  

Ron Paul has explicitly stated on many occasions that while he would allow young people to opt out of Soc Sec, the benefits for current retirees are one of the LAST things he would ever cut as president, even though he believes it is technically unconstitutional he would still fund the program.  Again, another issue where Paul is MORE MODERATE than Huntsman.  

Rose, sorry I couldn't dig some more of this up about Huntsman before you voted, but hopefully it will help others see the truth about the guy.  I still find him the least offensive GOP candidate not named Ron Paul, but I'm starting to realize that the guy is very flawed and a lot more conservative than the media portrays him.  

I do agree with him on the China thing, and that's all well and good, but I'm not a fan of a guy who supports a border fence and is the most extremist GOP candidate on pro-life issues outside of Santorum.   

Also on another note, Gary Johnson is now running as a Libertarian.  I doubt he'll have much opposition for their nomination so again Ron Paul is probably the best choice for most progressives in the primary season, unless you want to make some sort of hopeless "statement" in the Democratic primary by voting for one of the other random candidates who are running against BO there.  

 
Yes, the more and more I study the positions of all the candidates, the more and more I have decided to stop all this calculating of who is the most electable and if I vote for this guy who will it hurt and what not. I am just going to vote for the person that reflects my viewpoints on the issues and the hell with it!

                                                       GARY JOHNSON 2012


LordBaltimore

LordBaltimore Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 6:47am

Oh, Huntsman also believes in a border fence, and Paul doesn't.  Again, Huntsman is more EXTREME on immigration than Dr. Paul is but the media still thinks of him as the moderate.  

Huntsman also wants to get rid of the mortgage interest tax deduction, and he supports means testing for social security.  

Ron Paul has explicitly stated on many occasions that while he would allow young people to opt out of Soc Sec, the benefits for current retirees are one of the LAST things he would ever cut as president, even though he believes it is technically unconstitutional he would still fund the program.  Again, another issue where Paul is MORE MODERATE than Huntsman.  

Rose, sorry I couldn't dig some more of this up about Huntsman before you voted, but hopefully it will help others see the truth about the guy.  I still find him the least offensive GOP candidate not named Ron Paul, but I'm starting to realize that the guy is very flawed and a lot more conservative than the media portrays him.  

I do agree with him on the China thing, and that's all well and good, but I'm not a fan of a guy who supports a border fence and is the most extremist GOP candidate on pro-life issues outside of Santorum.   

Also on another note, Gary Johnson is now running as a Libertarian.  I doubt he'll have much opposition for their nomination so again Ron Paul is probably the best choice for most progressives in the primary season, unless you want to make some sort of hopeless "statement" in the Democratic primary by voting for one of the other random candidates who are running against BO there.  


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 6:42am

 LordBaltimore wrote:

Well, Jon Huntsman is much more pro-life than Ron Paul is.  Huntsman is in favor of a federal "right-to-life" amendment that would be enforced at the federal level.  Paul is not.  So Rose, I'm sorry you voted for the most pro-life GOP candidate outside of perhaps Santorum.  

I do disagree with Paul on this issue and am strongly pro-choice.  But you have to look at the probabilities — what is Paul more able to accomplish, stopping war or stopping abortion?  As commander in chief, the former, by far!  

Look, among republicans the only candidate more pro-CHOICE than Paul is possibly Mitt Romney, but Mitt Romney will do and say anything to get elected so I don't really believe any of his past actions or statements.  All the others are explicitly more pro-life.  If you can vote in a GOP primary, I'd strongly advise voting for Paul...why not do that now, and then you can vote for Obama against him if you really are a single issue pro-choice voter.  

The media need to stop portraying Huntsman as a moderate and Paul an extremist.  Huntsman is "moderate" on far fewer issues than Paul is.  He's more extreme on abortion, on the NDAA, on the federal government's power, bombing Iran, and on the drug war (the real moderate position on the drug war is to stop jailing nonviolent "offenders").  I don't mind Huntsman, and yes he is a distant second to Paul among the rest of the GOP candidates, but let's be real about the guy.

 
A cross post about contraception legislation



LordBaltimore

LordBaltimore Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 14, 2012 - 6:37am

 maryte wrote:


I cannot believe that someone who holds himself out as a Libertarian but would deny reproductive rights to approximately 50% of the population is truly sincere - except in his desire to control.
 
Well, Jon Huntsman is much more pro-life than Ron Paul is.  Huntsman is in favor of a federal "right-to-life" amendment that would be enforced at the federal level.  Paul is not.  So Rose, I'm sorry you voted for the most pro-life GOP candidate outside of perhaps Santorum.  

I do disagree with Paul on this issue and am strongly pro-choice.  But you have to look at the probabilities — what is Paul more able to accomplish, stopping war or stopping abortion?  As commander in chief, the former, by far!  

Look, among republicans the only candidate more pro-CHOICE than Paul is possibly Mitt Romney, but Mitt Romney will do and say anything to get elected so I don't really believe any of his past actions or statements.  All the others are explicitly more pro-life.  If you can vote in a GOP primary, I'd strongly advise voting for Paul...why not do that now, and then you can vote for Obama against him if you really are a single issue pro-choice voter.  

The media need to stop portraying Huntsman as a moderate and Paul an extremist.  Huntsman is "moderate" on far fewer issues than Paul is.  He's more extreme on abortion, on the NDAA, on the federal government's power, bombing Iran, and on the drug war (the real moderate position on the drug war is to stop jailing nonviolent "offenders").  I don't mind Huntsman, and yes he is a distant second to Paul among the rest of the GOP candidates, but let's be real about the guy.
marko86

marko86 Avatar

Location: North TX
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 11:18am

 Romulus wrote:

No I'm not, I'm not against regulating the banking industry and the Federal Reserve. Do we agree there? That the Fed should be transparent and regulated?

And Phil was no proponent of Austrian economics. He was simply a crook who pushed that repeal to replace it with some other fallacious bill that contained an Enron loophole to exploit. Guys like him have no principles or philosophies.. they're corruptible.
 
True that! Should also mention the his wife was and may still be, a lobbist for the banking industry. Funny how that work, huh.

I probably will caucus, here in texas for Ron Paul. not that I am a particualr proponent of his overall philosophy, but I give him credit for actually being consistent and true to his ideals. it will be Obama come the general though.
Romulus

Romulus Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 10:31am

 aflanigan wrote:


Thanks to the politicians I mentioned (such as Phil Gramm) who started buying into the Austrian economists' notion that we don't need regulation of financial institutions/markets.  You're making my case for me by citing the repeal of Glass/Steagal.

 
No I'm not, I'm not against regulating the banking industry and the Federal Reserve. Do we agree there? That the Fed should be transparent and regulated?

And Phil was no proponent of Austrian economics. He was simply a crook who pushed that repeal to replace it with some other fallacious bill that contained an Enron loophole to exploit. Guys like him have no principles or philosophies.. they're corruptible.

aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 9:32am

 Romulus wrote:

Glass Steagal was repealed thanks to who?
 

Thanks to the politicians I mentioned (such as Phil Gramm) who started buying into the Austrian economists' notion that we don't need regulation of financial institutions/markets.  You're making my case for me by citing the repeal of Glass/Steagal.
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:48am

 miamizsun wrote:

{#Lol}

please send bum salve asap
 
nah, you don't believe in all that hocus pocus...{#Wink}

cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:45am

 Beaker wrote:



We have that problem up here, with all of the parties!  None are totally devoid of loons.  
 
Absolutely true. No party, political or otherwise, is free of some crazies. But it seems like the GOP has been hijacked by its loonies. It seems like the nuttiest ones of the bunch are running the show. It's one thing to have a few outlying crackpots, that's to be expected. But to put them into leadership positions seems counter-productive.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:44am

 oldviolin wrote:
lots of pine trees and sand fleas too
 
{#Lol}

please send bum salve asap

oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 11, 2012 - 7:42am

 miamizsun wrote:

listen sugar pants, i'm sure the touchy feely between us would be a mutual exchange
 
lots of pine trees and sand fleas too
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next