I ask myself, "Self, is the Twitter provocateur in originating the comment trying to make a philosophical or behavioral sciences argument or does he try to connect any personal experience or maybe he repeating something he read or heard someone else say who maybe was trying to identify with something positive though wrapped up in a cautionary tale about violence. Perhaps purposely misconstrued in order to make a composite point. If Man in fact shares a brain with a monkey, then as long as he is violent he will be no more than a monkey; "intelligent but savage"; and willing to destroy to prove. If given the opportunity to take an evolutionary step toward actual self determination rather than the hit and miss approach can they or will they hear? Will they listen? Are humans monkeys? How can one possibly overcome the cacophony of spiritual tinnitus sounding out our squandered opportunities to live together and survive? Commonality. Not conformity.
and the larger point for me is that if you seek violence as an answer or solution at best it is temporary and unsustainable how much blood spilled is enough? and who decides? initiating violence against peaceful humans is a sure sign that your argument/premise is false/flawed when it comes to violence/war/conflict it seems that the vulnerable pay for the sins of the invulnerable
political shoehorning will get you revolutionary bunions! pass it on!
The irony is that the individual ants in Sir David's video are not black ants and red fire ants. The wood ant inhabitants are red and black in their coloration; red with black abdomen as are the field ants that he introduces from the jar, not in the jar. Almost if not identical in size and color.
I ask myself, "Self, is the Twitter provocateur in originating the comment trying to make a philosophical or behavioral sciences argument or does he try to connect any personal experience or maybe he repeating something he read or heard someone else say who maybe was trying to identify with something positive though wrapped up in a cautionary tale about violence. Perhaps purposely misconstrued in order to make a composite point. If Man in fact shares a brain with a monkey, then as long as he is violent he will be no more than a monkey; "intelligent but savage"; and willing to destroy to prove. If given the opportunity to take an evolutionary step toward actual self determination rather than the hit and miss approach can they or will they hear? Will they listen? Are humans monkeys? How can one possibly overcome the cacophony of spiritual tinnitus sounding out our squandered opportunities to live together and survive? Commonality. Not conformity. Individual giving of blessings and inner light to other people. How do we deal with the ancient upheavals of tribalism? We don't. Children do. We stand opposed to violent oblivion or we die trying with our beloved ancestors as children in our hearts. Forgiveness. Yes. Irony. Sure, I believe. I make no apologies for having faith in something bigger than all of it. Always listening. Etheric.
Also, ants of all colors and sizes will be fighting for survival here on earth long after they have consumed the remnants of prideful man. That's what I call Formic Acid...
It's the instigators ruining the status quo!!!1!11! PS: No shortage of alt-right crazy on that Twitter account...
Maybe. However some more food for thought. In a world where your physical identity is everything over your individuality, you and I are identical inside and out and will be treated as such. Enjoy.
I don't think so but you'd have to ask Lucy Lawless or Sir Edmund Hillary to be sure...or maybe haresfur or NoEnz. Does Lorde still hang out here? She may help out.
