[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Things You Thought Today - kurtster - Jul 20, 2024 - 12:52am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 19, 2024 - 8:50pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - Steely_D - Jul 19, 2024 - 8:42pm
 
Joe Biden - Steely_D - Jul 19, 2024 - 8:40pm
 
The Human Condition - oldviolin - Jul 19, 2024 - 7:43pm
 
favorite love songs - oldviolin - Jul 19, 2024 - 7:38pm
 
2024 Elections! - Steely_D - Jul 19, 2024 - 6:40pm
 
The Republican Convention - Red_Dragon - Jul 19, 2024 - 6:37pm
 
COVID-19 - Steely_D - Jul 19, 2024 - 6:35pm
 
Name My Band - haresfur - Jul 19, 2024 - 5:41pm
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Jul 19, 2024 - 5:02pm
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - oldviolin - Jul 19, 2024 - 4:50pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 19, 2024 - 4:45pm
 
July 2024 Photo Theme - Summer - Isabeau - Jul 19, 2024 - 3:17pm
 
Russia - R_P - Jul 19, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
Trump - Isabeau - Jul 19, 2024 - 12:54pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - GeneP59 - Jul 19, 2024 - 12:03pm
 
The Obituary Page - GeneP59 - Jul 19, 2024 - 12:00pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - RPnate1 - Jul 19, 2024 - 11:34am
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - Jul 19, 2024 - 10:19am
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Jul 19, 2024 - 10:14am
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - Jul 19, 2024 - 9:57am
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 19, 2024 - 9:49am
 
Song of the Day - buddy - Jul 19, 2024 - 9:29am
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - sunybuny - Jul 19, 2024 - 7:02am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - hialtidude - Jul 19, 2024 - 6:58am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 19, 2024 - 6:07am
 
Republican Party - thisbody - Jul 18, 2024 - 11:03pm
 
Europe - thisbody - Jul 18, 2024 - 10:59pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jul 18, 2024 - 8:43pm
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Jul 18, 2024 - 8:40pm
 
Living in America - black321 - Jul 18, 2024 - 8:14pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jul 18, 2024 - 11:13am
 
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today... - oldviolin - Jul 18, 2024 - 10:28am
 
Jon Stewart interview - Steely_D - Jul 18, 2024 - 7:36am
 
Gardeners Photos - Beaker - Jul 18, 2024 - 5:43am
 
Project 2025 - Beaker - Jul 18, 2024 - 5:09am
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:45pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 17, 2024 - 2:04pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Steely_D - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:51am
 
Best Song Comments. - q4Fry - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:32am
 
Rhetorical questions - sunybuny - Jul 17, 2024 - 7:29am
 
Musky Mythology - Red_Dragon - Jul 17, 2024 - 5:47am
 
What questions would you like to answer for the world? - oldviolin - Jul 16, 2024 - 5:43pm
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 4:48pm
 
Race in America - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:53pm
 
Live Music - skyguy - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:44pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Jul 16, 2024 - 3:43pm
 
New Music - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 2:26pm
 
Gimmie 5 Kurt! - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:30pm
 
China - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 12:05pm
 
Acoustic Guitar - thisbody - Jul 16, 2024 - 11:08am
 
Bear! - Beaker - Jul 16, 2024 - 6:43am
 
Favorite Quotes - Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 3:43pm
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - Isabeau - Jul 15, 2024 - 12:25pm
 
The Truth About (Modern) Popular Music - Proclivities - Jul 15, 2024 - 8:18am
 
Please don't ban me, but: Taylor Swift... - sunybuny - Jul 15, 2024 - 4:55am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Beaker - Jul 14, 2024 - 3:51pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jul 14, 2024 - 12:52pm
 
Media Bias - Beaker - Jul 14, 2024 - 9:46am
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2024 - 7:51am
 
AH! There's an elephant in the room! - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2024 - 3:42pm
 
Outstanding Covers - DaveInSaoMiguel - Jul 13, 2024 - 12:49pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:34am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - oldviolin - Jul 13, 2024 - 10:23am
 
RP on Mac Just Stopped Working - tourtelot - Jul 12, 2024 - 9:35pm
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:51pm
 
Tech & Science - Manbird - Jul 12, 2024 - 2:46pm
 
Classic TV Curiosities - Proclivities - Jul 12, 2024 - 12:50pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jul 12, 2024 - 10:48am
 
Florida - miamizsun - Jul 12, 2024 - 7:05am
 
Regarding Birds - Jiggz - Jul 12, 2024 - 1:41am
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - thisbody - Jul 11, 2024 - 10:36pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 11, 2024 - 2:05pm
 
Record Store Day - Proclivities - Jul 11, 2024 - 8:18am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » About RP » As I feared - Radio 2050 is Lefty Biased
Post to this Topic
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 8, 2024 - 11:44am

 rob311 wrote:


Scott, while I wouldn’t presume to speak for all libertarians or the woke, there may be a few areas where woke and libertarians would agree, e.g., LGBTQ+ rights and, at least for some libertarians, abortion rights. However, many woke positions are diametrically opposed to libertarian ones, including "speech is violence", cancellation or shouting over others' speech, DEI as institutionally implemented, BDS, intersectionality and its related view that creates the oppressor-oppressed duality.


Threadjacking a bit, it hasn't escaped my notice that Libertarians and "far left" and Republicans and 60s hippies all ended up saying the same thing at the end: "leave me alone! Freedom!" And then the practicalities of such a wish become problematic, like a little kid who wants to run away from his parents and then doesn't have an understanding of what that really means a few steps down the road.

We're all connected. All responsible. Living and dying without being considerate of others is a lonely, simplistic, selfish life.

rob311

rob311 Avatar



Posted: Feb 8, 2024 - 8:48am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


My hunch is that Libertarians *delete* *delete* about RP using its platform to voice what they believe, or voice what they think is valuable for their listeners. And I can't speak for them but I doubt they agree that "Woke" and "Libertarian" are mutually exclusive. 


Scott, while I wouldn’t presume to speak for all libertarians or the woke, there may be a few areas where woke and libertarians would agree, e.g., LGBTQ+ rights and, at least for some libertarians, abortion rights. However, many woke positions are diametrically opposed to libertarian ones, including "speech is violence", cancellation or shouting over others' speech, DEI as institutionally implemented, BDS, intersectionality and its related view that creates the oppressor-oppressed duality.
Beaker

Beaker Avatar

Location: Your safe space


Posted: Feb 8, 2024 - 6:50am

Err.  Am curious if the issue is a tad more complicated than merely the selection of content.

William, as always, has been clear that he welcomes all viewpoints.  I've also read that RP is now providing Radio 2050 to some other outlets, including, IIRC, an NPR station. So, this is an element of the Radio 2050 business plan - ie syndication (?)

Q. Are the episodes of the Radio 2050 content being provided to these outlets in a contract where they must take all, or can they cherry-pick as they see fit?  

Some of these other stations may not be interested in episodes that present an alternative view from their own existing programming.  And that could make the Radio 2050 content more difficult to find licensees (and revenue ?).

/idle thots

rob311

rob311 Avatar



Posted: Feb 7, 2024 - 3:51pm

 Steely_D wrote:


Well, I think you’re really asking for thoughtful and useful diversity, which is the problem; you have to find some that’s a valid contribution.
Someone can tell you that the world is a sphere and it’s true there is a dissenting view. But it’s valueless. It’s just noise for the sake of being difficult. 
It’s not just that diverse opinions express a dissenting or different view - but they have to some version of merit, not just disagreement with something.
Otherwise 






Steely (Dan?), I totally agree. See my response to Bill below.

rob311

rob311 Avatar



Posted: Feb 7, 2024 - 3:50pm

 William wrote:

We’d welcome your suggestions about potential guests who meet your political criteria and who are also actively engaged in pursuing solutions to the problems we’re facing.

Not talking about what should be done, or pointing fingers at “them”, but finding something that needs to be done and doing it.

I have no doubt that they’re out there, and we would gladly add their voices to the mix - just like we welcome all civil voices here in the RP forum. 



First off, I was hoping this would be your reaction so I'm very happy with your response. This country definitely needs more dialog.

Here are a few organizations that you might want to contact. All of them are working to make things better. Some on a global level and others on almost individual, case by case, level.

The Copenhagen Consensus Center (https://copenhagenconsensus.co...). A think tank that advises governments and philanthrophists on how to be most effective tackling the world's myriad of problems. The title of a book published in 2014 encapsulates the goal nicely: "How to Spend $75 Billion to Make the World a Better Place". Although primarily the vision of Bjorn Lomborg, heavy use is made of subject experts and interaction between them to obtain a consensus on both how to spend, and how to prioritize between different problems all competing for resources and is encapsulated in a recent book "Best Things First."

The Institute for Justice (https://ij.org/). One might think of IJ as a libertarian version of the ACLU. IJ provides free legal support to people whose rights are being infringed on by government. I suspect that much of what IJ does would appeal to people who are not libertarian: e.g., protecting freedom of speech, enhancing school choice, eliminating civil forfeiture, and enhancing economic liberty. For example, and picking just one of these, economic liberty, IJ has successfully acted on behalf of hair braiders who were forbidden to practice their craft without first completing 2,000 hours of cosmetology training and also on behalf of a casket manufacturer that was blocked from selling caskets without first getting a mortuary license. IJ frequently has cases that go to the Supreme Court, usually coming out on the victorious side. However, their most famous case was a Supreme Court loss. This was the Kelo v. City of New London case with the Kelo family fighting eminent domain seizure of their home by the town in which they lived so that the town could turn around and sell the land to Pfizer who wanted to build on it. The loss of the case, and the Kelo's home, was widely seen as unfair and led to favorable eminent domain reform around the country.

Another organization is Reason (https://reason.org/). A think tank with a focus on individual rights, transportation, pensions, education and psychedelics. Reason has a history of successfully working with local and state governments on pension reforms and transportation planning to name just two areas. Reason started advocating for gay and lesbian rights, particularly the right to marry, long before it became a progressive plank. The earliest article I can find online was in 2004, but I recollect that Reason's support for same-sex marriage goes back much further.

A fourth organization is the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, aka FIRE (https://www.thefire.org/). Like IJ, FIRE provides legal and other support directly to people. FIRE is more focused than IJ, specializing in clients who are being punished by government, their employer or school for what they said or wrote. Historically FIRE has focused on college students and faculty whose speech has been surpressed or who have faced penalties such as being expelled (as students) or fired (as faculty). FIRE is ideologically neutral with respect to clients it supports. Although suppression of speech is more frequent when the speech is conservative, FIRE has also supported a number of people whose speech was progressive. It is my recollection (but I cannot find support for it now) that by FIRE's own count approximately 1/3 of the cases it handles are suppression of progressive speech and the other 2/3 are suppression of conservative speech. FIRE has gotten a lot of media exposure recently in conjunction with congressional testimonies (and the fallout thereof) of the presidents of Harvard, Penn and MIT.

Fifth, there is the AHA Foundation (https://www.theahafoundation.o...). Founded by Aayan Hirsi Ali, a former Muslim who has experienced female genital mutilation and credible death threats (one was pinned to the body of a Dutch filmmaker after he was executed by an Islamic extremist) and is now a champion for women's rights, especially in predominantly Muslim countries.

All of these organizations have competent writers/speakers and if you contact them I would hope they would be happy to work with you on an episode.

Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 6, 2024 - 6:07pm

 rob311 wrote:

So, Radio 2050, are you in favor of diversity? Then how about some viewpoint diversity!



Well, I think you’re really asking for thoughtful and useful diversity, which is the problem; you have to find some that’s a valid contribution.
Someone can tell you that the world is a sphere and it’s true there is a dissenting view. But it’s valueless. It’s just noise for the sake of being difficult. 
It’s not just that diverse opinions express a dissenting or different view - but they have to some version of merit, not just disagreement with something.
Otherwise 




ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 6, 2024 - 3:31pm

 rob311 wrote:
  • Having 5 with a leftist/woke leaning wouldn't bother me if Radio 2050 didn't also have some with a libertarian or conservative viewpoint.


My hunch is that Libertarians *delete* *delete* about RP using its platform to voice what they believe, or voice what they think is valuable for their listeners. And I can't speak for them but I doubt they agree that "Woke" and "Libertarian" are mutually exclusive. 
William

William Avatar

Location: Eureka!
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 6, 2024 - 1:34pm

We’d welcome your suggestions about potential guests who meet your political criteria and who are also actively engaged in pursuing solutions to the problems we’re facing.

Not talking about what should be done, or pointing fingers at “them”, but finding something that needs to be done and doing it.

I have no doubt that they’re out there, and we would gladly add their voices to the mix - just like we welcome all civil voices here in the RP forum. 

rob311

rob311 Avatar



Posted: Feb 6, 2024 - 11:29am

I just went through the abstracts of the current 16 episodes on Radio 2050, and listened to a few, and by my tally the sixteen can roughly be categorized as follows:
  • 7 have a self-help (or community self-help) orientation
  • 5 are anti-capitalist or exhibit woke characteristics
  • 4 are difficult to classify
Having 5 with a leftist/woke leaning wouldn't bother me if Radio 2050 didn't also have some with a libertarian or conservative viewpoint.

The five that I think are leftist are as follows along with a brief explanation of what influenced my categorization:
  • Doughnut Economics. I did a deeper dive on this than the others, looking at their websites, concluding that it looks a lot like socialism. Doughnut Economics come close to echoing the socialist slogan "to each according to their needs, from each according to their abilities", adding a clause that might be "as long as none of our limits are violated". 
  • Partnerism. Seems a lot like socialism. Not sure what is meant by "the current domination-oriented system" but I suspect they mean capitalism. Partnerism seems sort of halfway between indivualism and communitarianism, the former generally associated with capitalism and the latter with socialism.
  • Community and Technology. On the face of it this doesn't seem anti-capitalist, but in the abstract one sees "challenging individualism" and "intersectionalist approaches to AI". The term "intersectionalist" comes straight out of the woke culture.
  • Green Amendment. May not be focused against capitalism, but the presenter lists one of her achievements as "successfully challenging pro-fracking laws", apparently and ironically unaware that fracking in the US is what has allowed the US, maybe alone among all countries, to actually lower its CO2 output over the last two decades.
  • Safe Spaces. This may not be anti capitalism, per se, but the title itself, "bystander intervention," and "economic justice" are all terms popularized in woke cancel culture on our college campuses.
So, Radio 2050, are you in favor of diversity? Then how about some viewpoint diversity!