[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

• • • Clownstock • • •  - Proclivities - Jul 14, 2020 - 1:59pm
 
RPeeps who would have a sense of humor if they were not s... - Proclivities - Jul 14, 2020 - 1:42pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Jul 14, 2020 - 1:20pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - buddy - Jul 14, 2020 - 12:16pm
 
Banksy! - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 14, 2020 - 10:44am
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Jul 14, 2020 - 10:15am
 
Trump - buddy - Jul 14, 2020 - 10:13am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - fractalv - Jul 14, 2020 - 8:59am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Steely_D - Jul 14, 2020 - 8:46am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Steely_D - Jul 14, 2020 - 8:35am
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2020 - 8:12am
 
Today in History - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2020 - 7:56am
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2020 - 7:18am
 
Oh, The Stupidity - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2020 - 7:13am
 
What Did You See Today? - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2020 - 7:11am
 
What Did You Do Today? - Proclivities - Jul 14, 2020 - 7:05am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2020 - 7:03am
 
Manbird's Stones - oldviolin - Jul 14, 2020 - 7:01am
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - Red_Dragon - Jul 14, 2020 - 5:24am
 
Joe Biden - kurtster - Jul 14, 2020 - 3:42am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - haresfur - Jul 13, 2020 - 10:46pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Jul 13, 2020 - 7:31pm
 
China - R_P - Jul 13, 2020 - 3:53pm
 
Excitable Boy: Zevon biography - buddy - Jul 13, 2020 - 12:32pm
 
Oh GOD, they're GAY! - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2020 - 9:37am
 
Counting with Pictures - ndg - Jul 13, 2020 - 8:56am
 
2020 Elections - Red_Dragon - Jul 13, 2020 - 8:17am
 
Sound clicks on announcements - billyrom - Jul 12, 2020 - 9:08pm
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - kcar - Jul 12, 2020 - 8:22pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 12, 2020 - 2:40pm
 
Caretakers Of Our Parents - oldviolin - Jul 12, 2020 - 8:42am
 
Offset between Music and Song/Interpret Text, Silence... - nicolas65 - Jul 12, 2020 - 8:29am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - Red_Dragon - Jul 12, 2020 - 8:09am
 
Gardeners Corner - Red_Dragon - Jul 12, 2020 - 7:49am
 
The Dragons' Roost - triskele - Jul 12, 2020 - 6:58am
 
Name My Album - Antigone - Jul 12, 2020 - 5:01am
 
And the good news is.... - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 11, 2020 - 7:32pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Jul 11, 2020 - 6:25pm
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - R_P - Jul 11, 2020 - 3:10pm
 
Canada - R_P - Jul 11, 2020 - 1:10pm
 
New Doves album ‘The Universal Want’ coming in September - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 11, 2020 - 11:00am
 
Religion as Beer - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 11, 2020 - 10:58am
 
Words that should be put on the substitutes bench for a year - Proclivities - Jul 11, 2020 - 10:23am
 
Environment - Red_Dragon - Jul 11, 2020 - 6:26am
 
RP streams in Opus - Romain98 - Jul 11, 2020 - 6:10am
 
Bad Poetry - sirdroseph - Jul 11, 2020 - 4:46am
 
AppleTV 4K and Radio Paradise stopping - edz - Jul 10, 2020 - 10:10pm
 
Fox Spews - buddy - Jul 10, 2020 - 5:44pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - edz - Jul 10, 2020 - 2:45pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Jul 10, 2020 - 2:29pm
 
Make Scott laugh - kcar - Jul 10, 2020 - 2:29pm
 
Economix - R_P - Jul 10, 2020 - 2:16pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Red_Dragon - Jul 10, 2020 - 1:57pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - ptooey - Jul 10, 2020 - 1:00pm
 
South Korea - islander - Jul 10, 2020 - 12:32pm
 
New Music - miamizsun - Jul 10, 2020 - 12:18pm
 
In My Room - miamizsun - Jul 10, 2020 - 11:58am
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - Jul 10, 2020 - 11:54am
 
Cool Stuff I Really Want - Proclivities - Jul 10, 2020 - 10:43am
 
True Confessions - buddy - Jul 10, 2020 - 9:30am
 
TV shows you watch - ScottN - Jul 10, 2020 - 8:22am
 
Constitution - Red_Dragon - Jul 10, 2020 - 7:05am
 
Race in America - sirdroseph - Jul 10, 2020 - 2:57am
 
Removing rated songs - Cache personalization - BillG - Jul 9, 2020 - 8:36pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 9, 2020 - 3:40pm
 
Social Networking - R_P - Jul 9, 2020 - 12:54pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Jul 9, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
One Reason I Don't Trust the Police - miamizsun - Jul 9, 2020 - 11:19am
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 9, 2020 - 10:32am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2020 - 8:53am
 
Ask the Libertarian - Lazy8 - Jul 9, 2020 - 7:40am
 
Dog - kcar - Jul 8, 2020 - 11:13pm
 
Questions. - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2020 - 6:49pm
 
Sunrise, Sunset - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2020 - 4:01pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2020 - 4:00pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » President Elizabeth Warren Page: 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post to this Topic
jahgirl8

jahgirl8 Avatar



Posted: Feb 28, 2020 - 12:40pm

LOL

 black321 wrote:


 haresfur wrote:

  
Before Kennedy, you couldn't be president without wearing a hat

 
Men Without Hats?

 


Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 28, 2020 - 7:56am



 haresfur wrote:
 
Before Kennedy, you couldn't be president without wearing a hat

 

After 1960 the first lady had to wear a hat instead.
buddy

buddy Avatar

Location: Rocky Mountains
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 28, 2020 - 7:51am



 black321 wrote:


 haresfur wrote:

  
Before Kennedy, you couldn't be president without wearing a hat

 
Men Without Hats?

 
Women Dontneedno Hats.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 28, 2020 - 7:16am



 haresfur wrote:

  
Before Kennedy, you couldn't be president without wearing a hat

 
Men Without Hats?

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 28, 2020 - 4:53am

my uninformed socially backward view is that she should play the common sense card

grab pete or cory booker for vp

throw the soft hammer at the extremists/fringe

shoot for slightly left of right or right of left of the indy voters

is that a sentence?  nevermind

approximately one third of the voters are on the left

approximately one third of the voters are on the right

approximately one third of the voters are in the creamy nougat center

i know what i would do
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 28, 2020 - 1:51am



 Steely_D wrote:


 haresfur wrote:


 R_P wrote:
.
 
or at least a whig 

 

That requires Cool Whip


 

I love that bit.
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 6:25pm



 R_P wrote:
 haresfur wrote:
Before Kennedy, you couldn't be president without wearing a hat
 
Before Washington, you couldn't be president without wearing a crown.
 
or at least a whig 

Isabeau

Isabeau Avatar

Location: sou' tex
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 6:14pm



 jahgirl8 wrote:
She's not going to be president.  She's fairly smart, but she never knows what the hell's going on, and no on will ever elect a woman who only wears black yoga pants with a black tee with a jacket of a different color every other day. You can't dress that way and be POTUS... wtf? Yang too... you can't wear a necktie? OOOOOPs, sorry, you ALSO cannot be POTUS.

 


 
I'll need to see your pass. As far as I can tell no one has voted you Hall Monitor. Are you lost?



R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 6:04pm

 haresfur wrote:
Before Kennedy, you couldn't be president without wearing a hat
 
Before Washington, you couldn't be president without wearing a crown.
haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 5:54pm



 jahgirl8 wrote:
She's not going to be president.  She's fairly smart, but she never knows what the hell's going on, and no on will ever elect a woman who only wears black yoga pants with a black tee with a jacket of a different color every other day. You can't dress that way and be POTUS... wtf? Yang too... you can't wear a necktie? OOOOOPs, sorry, you ALSO cannot be POTUS.
 
Before Kennedy, you couldn't be president without wearing a hat

BlueHeronDruid

BlueHeronDruid Avatar

Location: planting flowers


Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 5:52pm



 jahgirl8 wrote:
She's not going to be president.  She's fairly smart, but she never knows what the hell's going on, and no on will ever elect a woman who only wears black yoga pants with a black tee with a jacket of a different color every other day. You can't dress that way and be POTUS... wtf? Yang too... you can't wear a necktie? OOOOOPs, sorry, you ALSO cannot be POTUS.

 
Oh, the intellect on display here!

haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 5:24pm



 westslope wrote:


 haresfur wrote:


 westslope wrote:
What is Elizabeth Warren's position on increasing federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel?
 

Don't have a clue but they made a terrible mistake at the end of the energy crisis. When oil prices dropped they should have switched to a percentage tax that would have reduced costs in the short run but kept up with costs in the long run. Afterall, the cost to government increases when oil prices go up so it is a huge hit to the deficit. Especially when you maintain as large a military as the US.
 
Forgot that I wanted to respond to this post.   haresfur, I disagree 100%.  

High excise taxes would provide a permanent incentive to use less and use more efficiently.  Automobiles remain one of the most dangerous things that most North Americans use on a regular basis (with the exception of tobacco smoking and heavy alcohol consumption).   Automobile emissions are far less deadly than they once were but they are still deadly.  Close to 40% of Americans are obsese.  Roughly 2/3 of obese Americans have COPD.   To those people, air quality matters and should not be sacrificed for the God of cheap energy.  

Almost all the recessions in the USA in the post-war period have been preceded by an oil price shock.  High excise taxes would encourage Americans to use less and thus reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to oil price shocks.  

Lower income working people are the ones who get hit the hardest by recessions.   

High excise taxes on polluting fossil fuels for automobiles would provide funds for fixing America's dilapidated road system.

American health outcomes are absolutely atrocious and part of the answer requires Americans to use their automobiles less.  Not more.


   
 

But you aren't going to get high excise taxes. I think most developed countries should increase taxes on fossil fuels - especially the US where the tax rate is so low. The thing is the rate isn't even keeping up with inflation so make it a % tax the have the policy discussions to figure out what the % should be
jahgirl8

jahgirl8 Avatar



Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 4:44pm

She's not going to be president.  She's fairly smart, but she never knows what the hell's going on, and no on will ever elect a woman who only wears black yoga pants with a black tee with a jacket of a different color every other day. You can't dress that way and be POTUS... wtf? Yang too... you can't wear a necktie? OOOOOPs, sorry, you ALSO cannot be POTUS.

 BlueHeronDruid wrote:


 jahgirl8 wrote:


 westslope wrote:
Does Elizabeth Warren understand the concepts of adverse selection and moral hazard?
 

no
 
Awesome! We have an expert on Elizabeth Warren! Please school us.

 


westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 4:44pm



 haresfur wrote:


 westslope wrote:
What is Elizabeth Warren's position on increasing federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel?
 

Don't have a clue but they made a terrible mistake at the end of the energy crisis. When oil prices dropped they should have switched to a percentage tax that would have reduced costs in the short run but kept up with costs in the long run. Afterall, the cost to government increases when oil prices go up so it is a huge hit to the deficit. Especially when you maintain as large a military as the US.
 
Forgot that I wanted to respond to this post.   haresfur, I disagree 100%.  

High excise taxes would provide a permanent incentive to use less and use more efficiently.  Automobiles remain one of the most dangerous things that most North Americans use on a regular basis (with the exception of tobacco smoking and heavy alcohol consumption).   Automobile emissions are far less deadly than they once were but they are still deadly.  Close to 40% of Americans are obsese.  Roughly 2/3 of obese Americans have COPD.   To those people, air quality matters and they should not be sacrificed to the God of cheap energy.  

Almost all the recessions in the USA in the post-war period have been preceded by an oil price shock.  High excise taxes would encourage Americans to use less and thus reduce the vulnerability of the US economy to oil price shocks.  

Lower income working people are the ones who get hit the hardest by recessions.   

High excise taxes on polluting fossil fuels for automobiles would provide funds for fixing America's dilapidated road system.

American health outcomes are absolutely atrocious and part of the answer requires Americans to use their automobiles less.  Not more.


   
BlueHeronDruid

BlueHeronDruid Avatar

Location: planting flowers


Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 4:26pm



 jahgirl8 wrote:


 westslope wrote:
Does Elizabeth Warren understand the concepts of adverse selection and moral hazard?
 

no
 
Awesome! We have an expert on Elizabeth Warren! Please school us.

jahgirl8

jahgirl8 Avatar



Posted: Feb 24, 2020 - 4:23pm



 westslope wrote:
Does Elizabeth Warren understand the concepts of adverse selection and moral hazard?
 

no
cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 20, 2020 - 9:03am



 rgio wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:
 
The reality of our democracy is that we are too lazy and too stupid to assess the viability of more complex plans.  Medicare for all may actually be a really good plan, but nobody can follow the cost increases and decreases.  The fact that people are fighting to protect....think about it, protect....unreasonably high premiums that still have risks associated with coverage is insanity.  I left my last job a year ago, and have spent $24k on COBRA premiums over 12 months.  No doctors visits, no prescriptions, 3 dental checkups....$24k.   My elderly parents had medical bills over $400k in 2019.  We're fighting to keep this?

Warren's problem is that there aren't enough rich people to pay for everything.  She throws around spending numbers every minute or two...$100M for this, $2B for that...and her only tangible revenue source is a 2% billionaire tax.

 
I agree with almost everything here. COBRA is a joke, when I've left jobs I was never able to afford the premiums. I'm out of work, and you expect me to pony up that kind of scratch?

What I don't exactly agree with is the number of rich people. Well, the number of really rich people. Consider some simple math. Forget inflation here, let's just use today's numbers.

As a degreed engineer, let's say I make $100,000 year. Nice living, right? Okay, say I worked 40 years. Heck, 50 years. How much money did I make in my lifetime? Any guesses? Again, ignore inflation, taxes, etc.

Now compare that number with many hundreds of CEOs, CFOs, hedge fund traders, etc. etc. make in a year. Their ANNUAL salaries are often many times more, hundreds of times more, than I made IN MY WHOLE LIFE. Remember, I'm a degreed engineer who made a nice living doing my job - I'm not exactly complaining about what I made. But the disparity is obscene.

But it gets better. Due to their outsized income, the really rich have a LOT of money left over after paying their living expenses, no matter how lavish. What's a mansion cost these days? $20 million? That's couch-cushion money. Look at Bloomberg: he's already spent, what, $200 million? For what? A mansion, a yacht? No. Heck, let's not even mention piddling trifles like schools, clean water, health care? No, he's spent that money, crazy money, on campaign ads. Can't live in it, can't drive it, doesn't actually do any 'good' unless you LIKE being bombarded with ads.

Yet again, it gets better. So what do they do with all that extra green? Invest it, of course. Funny thing is, the income they receive from those investments is taxed at roughly HALF of the income I made by the sweat of my brow (furrowed). A dollar invested in, say, a credit-default-swap, is worth more than a dollar earned by, say, digging a ditch. The fiction of financial vehicles is worth more than the fact of hard work. 

Think about campaign contributions for a minute. They aren't tax-deductible, from Intuit/Turbotax:
"According to the IRS:“You can’t deduct contributions made to a political candidate, a campaign committee, or a newsletter fund. Advertisements in convention bulletins and admissions to dinners or programs that benefit a political party or political candidate aren’t deductible.” This includes Political Action Committees (PACs), as well."

So the really rich don't want to pay more taxes, but they are quite happy to throw MILLIONS of dollars at the candidate they think will keep their taxes low. What if they just paid a fraction of those millions in taxes instead? Hey Bloomberg, instead of throwing $200 million into the ether, why not offer grants for education, infrastructure, health initiatives, et al? Can you imagine what communities could do with the hundreds of millions of dollars poured into PACs?  We could have schools, hospitals, and roads that make the Emerald City look like a slum.

The really rich have thoroughly rigged the system. It's not unique, in fact I suspect it's inherently human. Problem is, eventually the rabble get sick of being trod upon. The results are well-documented, and uniformly unpleasant.

I'll make a prediction that has never, not once, failed me. "Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better."

Peace,
c.





sunybuny

sunybuny Avatar

Location: The West & Best Coast of FLA
Gender: Female


Posted: Feb 20, 2020 - 7:21am

  What's the old joke about sausage and legislation? Too damn true.

 miamizsun wrote:
one of the things i enjoy about the niskanen center is that the talking heads there don;t always agree (not an echo chamber)

i heard one them say we debate and argue over issues way more than one might think (or something like that)

i read this piece on warrenism by will wilkinson and while i don't agree with all of it i think it has some value

Building a Better Warrenism

this quote/nugget stood out to me

The result is the confounding spectacle of candidates attempting to attract supporters with proposals they know they cannot implement. Reporters ask how candidates plan to pay for policies that will never be enacted. Pundits and wonks add up the “total cost” of agendas that would require unified partisan control of government to get even partially enacted. Voters are left systematically misled about what they can realistically expect and disappointed that they never get what they’re promised. When this happens again and again, bomb-throwing “outsider” candidates who promise to blow up the system and barrel through gridlock end up looking better and better.
 


rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 20, 2020 - 6:07am



 miamizsun wrote:
one of the things i enjoy about the niskanen center is that the talking heads there don;t always agree (not an echo chamber)

i heard one them say we debate and argue over issues way more than one might think (or something like that)

i read this piece on warrenism by will wilkinson and while i don't agree with all of it i think it has some value

Building a Better Warrenism

this quote/nugget stood out to me

The result is the confounding spectacle of candidates attempting to attract supporters with proposals they know they cannot implement. Reporters ask how candidates plan to pay for policies that will never be enacted. Pundits and wonks add up the “total cost” of agendas that would require unified partisan control of government to get even partially enacted. Voters are left systematically misled about what they can realistically expect and disappointed that they never get what they’re promised. When this happens again and again, bomb-throwing “outsider” candidates who promise to blow up the system and barrel through gridlock end up looking better and better.
 
The reality of our democracy is that we are too lazy and too stupid to assess the viability of more complex plans.  Medicare for all may actually be a really good plan, but nobody can follow the cost increases and decreases.  The fact that people are fighting to protect....think about it, protect....unreasonably high premiums that still have risks associated with coverage is insanity.  I left my last job a year ago, and have spent $24k on COBRA premiums over 12 months.  No doctors visits, no prescriptions, 3 dental checkups....$24k.   My elderly parents had medical bills over $400k in 2019.  We're fighting to keep this?

Warren's problem is that there aren't enough rich people to pay for everything.  She throws around spending numbers every minute or two...$100M for this, $2B for that...and her only tangible revenue source is a 2% billionaire tax.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 20, 2020 - 5:32am

one of the things i enjoy about the niskanen center is that the talking heads there don;t always agree (not an echo chamber)

i heard one them say we debate and argue over issues way more than one might think (or something like that)

i read this piece on warrenism by will wilkinson and while i don't agree with all of it i think it has some value

Building a Better Warrenism

this quote/nugget stood out to me

The result is the confounding spectacle of candidates attempting to attract supporters with proposals they know they cannot implement. Reporters ask how candidates plan to pay for policies that will never be enacted. Pundits and wonks add up the “total cost” of agendas that would require unified partisan control of government to get even partially enacted. Voters are left systematically misled about what they can realistically expect and disappointed that they never get what they’re promised. When this happens again and again, bomb-throwing “outsider” candidates who promise to blow up the system and barrel through gridlock end up looking better and better.
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4  Next