NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Jun 26, 2024 - 2:41pm
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Jun 26, 2024 - 1:45pm
Russia
- R_P - Jun 26, 2024 - 1:27pm
iOS app download manager problem
- RPnate1 - Jun 26, 2024 - 12:25pm
What is your favorite music video?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 26, 2024 - 11:39am
Post your favorite 'You Tube' Videos Here
- Red_Dragon - Jun 26, 2024 - 10:10am
2024 Elections!
- R_P - Jun 26, 2024 - 9:13am
June 2024 Photo Theme - Eyes
- fractalv - Jun 26, 2024 - 8:30am
Wordle - daily game
- JrzyTmata - Jun 26, 2024 - 8:24am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jun 26, 2024 - 8:10am
WikiLeaks
- R_P - Jun 26, 2024 - 6:50am
Trump
- R_P - Jun 26, 2024 - 6:21am
Anti-War
- R_P - Jun 26, 2024 - 6:11am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jun 26, 2024 - 5:52am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Jun 26, 2024 - 5:15am
Ukraine
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 26, 2024 - 5:11am
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Jun 25, 2024 - 9:24pm
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey
- GeneP59 - Jun 25, 2024 - 8:59pm
::odd but intriguing::
- Beaker - Jun 25, 2024 - 4:09pm
Israel
- R_P - Jun 25, 2024 - 2:42pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jun 25, 2024 - 12:08pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2024 - 11:26am
*** PUNS *** FRUIT
- Proclivities - Jun 25, 2024 - 11:23am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2024 - 11:10am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jun 25, 2024 - 9:45am
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Jun 25, 2024 - 9:40am
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Jun 25, 2024 - 8:37am
Music Videos
- miamizsun - Jun 25, 2024 - 8:11am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- wossName - Jun 25, 2024 - 4:47am
China
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 25, 2024 - 4:44am
MTV's The Real World
- R_P - Jun 24, 2024 - 11:11pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Jun 24, 2024 - 7:14pm
Breaking News
- Red_Dragon - Jun 24, 2024 - 5:35pm
Baseball, anyone?
- rgio - Jun 24, 2024 - 5:02pm
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Jun 24, 2024 - 10:45am
Little known information... maybe even facts
- Proclivities - Jun 24, 2024 - 8:56am
How do you create optimism?
- R_P - Jun 24, 2024 - 8:27am
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- R_P - Jun 23, 2024 - 8:04pm
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - Jun 23, 2024 - 7:49pm
favorite love songs
- thisbody - Jun 23, 2024 - 3:35pm
Prog Rockers Anonymous
- thisbody - Jun 23, 2024 - 2:24pm
The Dragons' Roost
- thisbody - Jun 23, 2024 - 2:01pm
Dumb Laws
- thisbody - Jun 23, 2024 - 1:51pm
BEATLES Make History AGAIN!!
- thisbody - Jun 23, 2024 - 9:12am
TV shows you watch
- R_P - Jun 23, 2024 - 8:57am
Congress
- R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 5:53pm
Song of the Day
- thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:32pm
What do you snack on?
- thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 3:20pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:44pm
What did you have for dinner?
- triskele - Jun 22, 2024 - 2:31pm
Jam! (why should a song stop)
- thisbody - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:53pm
Things I Saw Today...
- R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 1:38pm
Some bands or songs are recurring too much in Rock channe...
- mlebihan29 - Jun 22, 2024 - 9:26am
Fox Spews
- R_P - Jun 22, 2024 - 9:19am
Sonos
- thatslongformud - Jun 22, 2024 - 6:18am
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Jun 22, 2024 - 4:44am
Too much classic rock lately?
- thisbody - Jun 21, 2024 - 4:01pm
Girls Just Want to Have Fun
- oldviolin - Jun 21, 2024 - 2:22pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:26pm
Electronic Music
- Manbird - Jun 21, 2024 - 12:14pm
LeftWingNutZ
- Steely_D - Jun 21, 2024 - 8:07am
The Obituary Page
- ColdMiser - Jun 21, 2024 - 7:56am
Basketball
- GeneP59 - Jun 20, 2024 - 4:53pm
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- Antigone - Jun 20, 2024 - 4:04pm
Shall We Dance?
- Steely_D - Jun 20, 2024 - 1:18pm
Predictions
- oldviolin - Jun 20, 2024 - 11:18am
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone
- oldviolin - Jun 20, 2024 - 11:10am
Just Wrong
- ColdMiser - Jun 20, 2024 - 7:43am
Pink Floyd Set?
- Coaxial - Jun 20, 2024 - 5:46am
Whatever happened to Taco Wagon?
- Coaxial - Jun 19, 2024 - 6:14pm
20+ year listeners?
- islander - Jun 18, 2024 - 7:41pm
Other Medical Stuff
- miamizsun - Jun 18, 2024 - 2:35pm
Hello from Greece!
- miamizsun - Jun 18, 2024 - 2:35pm
Europe
- R_P - Jun 18, 2024 - 9:33am
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 16, 2024 - 8:57pm
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
Europe »
Europe
|
Page: 1, 2, 3 Next |
R_P
Gender:
|
|
thisbody
Location: North (doubtful) Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 18, 2024 - 3:33am |
|
ColdMiser wrote:
This should be a wake up call to the US Democratic party. Seems that the lurch to the right is a result of folks unhappy with higher prices and immigration. The same things that keep Biden's poll numbers in the crapper.
What many people in Europe want (as per the EU elections) are things the media and political establishment try to publicly ignore, like:
Less weapons for Ukraine, less bellicosity, more cheap energy, low prices in the supermarket, and less foreigners.
|
|
thisbody
Location: North (doubtful) Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 11, 2024 - 1:23am |
|
Europeâs insurgent Right wonât change anything
The right-wing populists do not have a common agenda on Europeâs most pressing issues, and when they get a sniff of power they tend to bend towards the EU establishment anyway.
|
|
thisbody
Location: North (doubtful) Gender:
|
|
ColdMiser
Location: On the Trail Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 10, 2024 - 7:44am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
As for the elections over the weekend, the expected lurch to the far right has occurred. Democracy is like a drunkard stumbling home, it very rarely can follow a straight line. That said, there is still a strong center in the European Parliament.
This lurch to the right is basically a protest vote and will reverse some time in the future, when people realise the far right don't have any solutions either. It's like Brexit all over again.
In Germany the groundswell behind the AfD is fuelled by the disaffected, namely eastern German states and also rural areas in Western Europe. Much like the States I guess. All the people who don't want to change, or at least don't want to feel forced to have to change. Denial sums it up quite nicely. Also supported by a lot of affluent voters who are scared of losing what they have.
For Europe's climate goals it is a disaster.
This should be a wake up call to the US Democratic party. Seems that the lurch to the right is a result of folks unhappy with higher prices and immigration. The same things that keep Biden's poll numbers in the crapper.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 10, 2024 - 3:43am |
|
kurtster wrote:
You are very wrong about how NATO is funded.
The 2% defence investment guideline
In 2014, NATO Heads of State and Government agreed to commit 2% of their national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defence spending, to help ensure the Alliance's continued military readiness. This decision was taken in response to Russiaâs illegal annexation of Crimea, and amid broader instability in the Middle East. The 2014 Defence Investment Pledge built on an earlier commitment to meet this 2% of GDP guideline, agreed in 2006 by NATO Defence Ministers. The 2% of GDP guideline is an important indicator of the political resolve of individual Allies to contribute to NATOâs common defence efforts.
In 2024, two thirds of Allies are expected to meet or exceed the target of investing at least 2% of GDP in defence, compared to only three Allies in 2014.
There are still deadbeat NATO members even though Trump decreased the number with his threats. Before Trump it was less than half of the members honored their commitments. Namely one third of the members as illustrated above.
Here's something recent which states that currently only 35% of NATO members are making that 2% commitment in contrast to NATO's own statements above.
Only 35% of NATO Countries Meet the Groupâs Defense Spending Target
Controversial comments by former President Donald Trump turned attention to the alliance. Here's which member countries are meeting a defense spending benchmark.
By Elliott Davis Jr.
March 7, 2024, at 3:55 p.m.
your reading comprehension skills leave something to be desired. What I wrote is totally consistent with NATO's 2% investment guideline.
Moreover, my point was that post-Trump, the failure for most NATO members to meet the 2% guideline in 2023 is pretty much unchanged (as your figures so clearly show). In other words, Trump didn't achieve a damn thing. The uptick in 2024 in defence spending in 2024 can be solely attributed to Russian aggression.
PS .. quotes from Trump "they fail to pay the bills", "they owe us an enormous amount of money".. etc. .. do I need to go on?
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 10, 2024 - 1:22am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: kurtster wrote: All that Trump did was shake down the deadbeats. Made them pay up. Made a call for the rest of the members to start pulling their own weight. So who needs NATO ? Is its usefulness and purpose over ? I could ask the same about the U N.
Sorry to disillusion you, but Trump didn't make anybody pay up. NATO is not a protection racket and doesn't work that way (to flog a dead horse, but hey, if you think it is just injured or lame, feel free to keep pushing the idea). Each NATO member itself decides on its defence budget, the U.S. included. The only person who made NATO members reconsider their defence spending was Putin. You can see that the closer a nation is to Russia, the higher its defence spending relative to GDP. I wonder why? You are very wrong about how NATO is funded. The 2% defence investment guideline In 2014, NATO Heads of State and Government agreed to commit 2% of their national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defence spending, to help ensure the Alliance's continued military readiness. This decision was taken in response to Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea, and amid broader instability in the Middle East. The 2014 Defence Investment Pledge built on an earlier commitment to meet this 2% of GDP guideline, agreed in 2006 by NATO Defence Ministers. The 2% of GDP guideline is an important indicator of the political resolve of individual Allies to contribute to NATO’s common defence efforts. In 2024, two thirds of Allies are expected to meet or exceed the target of investing at least 2% of GDP in defence, compared to only three Allies in 2014.
There are still deadbeat NATO members even though Trump decreased the number with his threats. Before Trump it was less than half of the members honored their commitments. Namely one third of the members as illustrated above.
Here's something recent which states that currently only 35% of NATO members are making that 2% commitment in contrast to NATO's own statements above.
Only 35% of NATO Countries Meet the Group’s Defense Spending Target
Controversial comments by former President Donald Trump turned attention to the alliance. Here's which member countries are meeting a defense spending benchmark. By Elliott Davis Jr. March 7, 2024, at 3:55 p.m.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 10, 2024 - 12:33am |
|
As for the elections over the weekend, the expected lurch to the far right has occurred. Democracy is like a drunkard stumbling home, it very rarely can follow a straight line. That said, there is still a strong center in the European Parliament.
This lurch to the right is basically a protest vote and will reverse some time in the future, when people realise the far right don't have any solutions either. It's like Brexit all over again.
In Germany the groundswell behind the AfD is fuelled by the disaffected, namely eastern German states and also rural areas in Western Europe. Much like the States I guess. All the people who don't want to change, or at least don't want to feel forced to have to change. Denial sums it up quite nicely. Also supported by a lot of affluent voters who are scared of losing what they have.
For Europe's climate goals it is a disaster.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 10, 2024 - 12:08am |
|
kurtster wrote:
All that Trump did was shake down the deadbeats. Made them pay up. Made a call for the rest of the members to start pulling their own weight.
So who needs NATO ? Is its usefulness and purpose over ?
I could ask the same about the U N.
Sorry to disillusion you, but Trump didn't make anybody pay up. NATO is not a protection racket and doesn't work that way (to flog a dead horse, but hey, if you think it is just injured or lame, feel free to keep pushing the idea).
Each NATO member itself decides on its defence budget, the U.S. included. The only person who made NATO members reconsider their defence spending was Putin. You can see that the closer a nation is to Russia, the higher its defence spending relative to GDP. I wonder why?
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 9, 2024 - 11:04pm |
|
thisbody wrote: The result, as this week has demonstrated, is an infantilised political class terrified at the prospect of losing its transatlantic overlord.
Which brings us to the alternative view: that a more isolationist America under Trump would be an opportunity for Europe to finally develop its own strategic autonomy. (UnHerd) All that Trump did was shake down the deadbeats. Made them pay up. Made a call for the rest of the members to start pulling their own weight. So who needs NATO ? Is its usefulness and purpose over ? I could ask the same about the U N.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jun 9, 2024 - 5:38pm |
|
|
|
haresfur
Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm |
|
thisbody wrote:
Nato is one of the key institutions through which the US has exercised its control over post-war Western Europe
So perhaps we shouldnât be surprised that this is exactly what the US has achieved by dragging the whole of Europe, via Nato, into a proxy war with Russia in Ukraine. It has allowed the US to reassert its waning hegemony over Europe; it has driven a deep wedge between Europe and Russia; and it has condemned Germany to deindustrialisation.
Of course, one could argue that European leaders have largely brought this upon themselves. But it is also the natural outcome of an âallianceâ that has always treated European nations as subordinates. The result, as this week has demonstrated, is an infantilised political class terrified at the prospect of losing its transatlantic overlord. Which brings us to the alternative view: that a more isolationist America under Trump would be an opportunity for Europe to finally develop its own strategic autonomy.
(UnHerd)
Russia invading Ukraine is not a proxy war started by the US. Ukraine was kept out of NATO to reduce Russia's perception that it would be a threat to them. Fat lot of good that did. You are right that the European countries need to up their military and their influence to counteract Russia.
Nice troll, though.
|
|
thisbody
Location: North (doubtful) Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 5, 2024 - 10:09am |
|
Nato is one of the key institutions through which the US has exercised its control over post-war Western Europe
So perhaps we shouldnât be surprised that this is exactly what the US has achieved by dragging the whole of Europe, via Nato, into a proxy war with Russia in Ukraine. It has allowed the US to reassert its waning hegemony over Europe; it has driven a deep wedge between Europe and Russia; and it has condemned Germany to deindustrialisation.
Of course, one could argue that European leaders have largely brought this upon themselves. But it is also the natural outcome of an âallianceâ that has always treated European nations as subordinates. The result, as this week has demonstrated, is an infantilised political class terrified at the prospect of losing its transatlantic overlord. Which brings us to the alternative view: that a more isolationist America under Trump would be an opportunity for Europe to finally develop its own strategic autonomy.
(UnHerd)
|
|
thisbody
Location: North (doubtful) Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 25, 2023 - 1:08pm |
|
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 25, 2023 - 11:32am |
|
thisbody wrote:
|
|
thisbody
Location: North (doubtful) Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 25, 2023 - 7:27am |
|
|
|
thisbody
Location: North (doubtful) Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 25, 2023 - 12:51am |
|
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Apr 3, 2022 - 7:31pm |
|
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2022 - 5:25am |
|
kurtster wrote:
Trump actually sent weapons (defensive).
FTA: In 2019, Trump moved to block the delivery of lethal aid to Ukraine as part of an effort to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce an investigation connected to Bidenâs son. Zelensky made no such announcement, and the hold-up triggered the first impeachment of Trump.
https://www.politico.com/news/...
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 8, 2022 - 9:31pm |
|
haresfur wrote: So here's the thing I don't get. If putin wanted to invade Ukraine, he easily could have done it with no US response when trump was president. As soon as trump was elected, I figured Ukraine was a goner. Why did he stop at Crimea? My only guess is that he doesn't really give a shit about Ukraine but is using it to drive a wedge between US and western Europe. But I really don't know. imo ... You are completely wrong on everything you stated. While Obama only gave Ukraine blankets and pillows, Trump actually sent weapons (defensive). Putin stopped at Crimea because Trump was elected. I know you and nearly everyone else here still believes the Steele Dossier and that Trump was Putin's bitch. The demonetization of Putin /Russia by the democratic party with the phony Russia, Russia, Russia hoax is why things are the way they are today. And it drove Putin into the open arms of Xi. I hold the DNC directly responsible for this. Putin does not want Ukraine to join NATO. Putin wants Ukraine back more than anything else and for a multitude of reasons. Also reading the comments below, everyone seems to forget the genocide of 4+ million Ukrainians starved to death by Stalin. . In spring 1933 death rates in Ukraine spiked. Between 1931 and 1934 at least 5 million people perished of hunger all across the U.S.S.R. Among them, according to a study conducted by a team of Ukrainian demographers, were at least 3.9 million Ukrainians.Another win for socialism and collectivism. Not.
|
|
|