Framed - movie guessing game
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2025 - 9:42am
Wordle - daily game
- marko86 - May 12, 2025 - 9:41am
Trump
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2025 - 9:29am
NY Times Strands
- ptooey - May 12, 2025 - 8:48am
Today in History
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:47am
Celebrity Face Recognition
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:07am
Radio Paradise Comments
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:02am
NYTimes Connections
- ptooey - May 12, 2025 - 7:42am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- rgio - May 12, 2025 - 5:46am
Global Warming
- rgio - May 12, 2025 - 4:39am
New Music
- miamizsun - May 12, 2025 - 3:47am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- winter - May 11, 2025 - 8:41pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - May 11, 2025 - 6:47pm
The Dragons' Roost
- triskele - May 11, 2025 - 5:58pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Manbird - May 11, 2025 - 5:26pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- epsteel - May 11, 2025 - 12:30pm
Ukraine
- R_P - May 11, 2025 - 11:03am
Things You Thought Today
- GeneP59 - May 11, 2025 - 9:52am
Breaking News
- Steely_D - May 10, 2025 - 8:52pm
May 2025 Photo Theme - Action
- fractalv - May 10, 2025 - 7:54pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - May 10, 2025 - 3:50pm
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 2:16pm
Israel
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 1:18pm
Real Time with Bill Maher
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 12:21pm
Artificial Intelligence
- q4Fry - May 10, 2025 - 10:01am
No Rock Mix on Alexa?
- epsteel - May 10, 2025 - 9:45am
Kodi Addon
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 10, 2025 - 9:19am
What Makes You Laugh?
- Isabeau - May 10, 2025 - 5:53am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 9, 2025 - 9:34pm
Immigration
- R_P - May 9, 2025 - 5:35pm
Basketball
- GeneP59 - May 9, 2025 - 4:58pm
The Obituary Page
- GeneP59 - May 9, 2025 - 4:45pm
Pink Floyd
- miamizsun - May 9, 2025 - 3:52pm
Freedom of speech?
- R_P - May 9, 2025 - 2:19pm
Questions.
- kurtster - May 8, 2025 - 11:56pm
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - May 8, 2025 - 9:08pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - May 8, 2025 - 7:27pm
Save NPR and PBS - SIGN THE PETITION
- R_P - May 8, 2025 - 3:32pm
How about a stream of just the metadata?
- ednazarko - May 8, 2025 - 11:22am
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - May 8, 2025 - 9:23am
no-money fun
- islander - May 8, 2025 - 7:55am
UFO's / Aliens blah blah blah: BOO !
- dischuckin - May 8, 2025 - 7:03am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- miamizsun - May 8, 2025 - 5:53am
Into The Wild
- Red_Dragon - May 7, 2025 - 7:34pm
Get the Money out of Politics!
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 5:06pm
What Makes You Sad?
- Antigone - May 7, 2025 - 2:58pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 2:33pm
The Perfect Government
- Proclivities - May 7, 2025 - 2:05pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 10:13am
Living in America
- islander - May 7, 2025 - 9:38am
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- JimTreadwell - May 7, 2025 - 8:08am
Pakistan
- Red_Dragon - May 6, 2025 - 2:21pm
SCOTUS
- R_P - May 6, 2025 - 1:53pm
Canada
- R_P - May 6, 2025 - 11:00am
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- ColdMiser - May 6, 2025 - 10:00am
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- ColdMiser - May 6, 2025 - 8:06am
What's your mood today?
- GeneP59 - May 6, 2025 - 6:57am
China
- R_P - May 5, 2025 - 6:01pm
Trump Lies™
- R_P - May 5, 2025 - 5:50pm
Song of the Day
- rgio - May 5, 2025 - 5:33am
Love the Cinco de Mayo celebration!
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:53am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:49am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:48am
The Bucket List
- Red_Dragon - May 4, 2025 - 1:08pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- winter - May 4, 2025 - 9:28am
Australia
- R_P - May 3, 2025 - 11:37pm
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - May 3, 2025 - 6:52pm
Democratic Party
- Isabeau - May 3, 2025 - 5:04pm
Philly
- Proclivities - May 3, 2025 - 6:26am
Race in America
- R_P - May 2, 2025 - 12:01pm
Multi-Room AirPlay using iOS app on Mac M
- downbeat - May 2, 2025 - 8:11am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- black321 - May 1, 2025 - 6:44pm
Museum of Iconic Album Covers
- Proclivities - May 1, 2025 - 12:24pm
Regarding cats
- Isabeau - May 1, 2025 - 12:11pm
When I need a Laugh I ...
- Isabeau - May 1, 2025 - 10:37am
|
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
Elsewhere »
NATO
|
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Jul 9, 2026 - 2:42pm |
|
ð¯ Yellow Peril Reloaded
NB: The lunatic is called Ruht-tuh
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Jul 9, 2026 - 1:48pm |
|
And yet...
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Jul 8, 2026 - 12:03pm |
|
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Jul 8, 2026 - 11:24am |
|
Deep Throat Rutte
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Jul 8, 2026 - 10:05am |
|
ð¤¡
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Jul 8, 2026 - 9:03am |
|
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Jul 5, 2026 - 4:35pm |
|
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
May 8, 2026 - 1:56pm |
|
The silent projectionists
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
May 4, 2026 - 3:20pm |
|
|
|
mannixj

Location: little insight 
|
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2026 - 9:01am |
|
islander wrote:
What's a little ethnic cleansing between business partners, right?
Your addled little mind can't wait to justify any bigoted atrocities.
That wasn't a NATO act, although major NATO countries were involved in bombing Serbia to Dumbfuckistan, I believe.
It was the first time German military got involved in a conflict on foreign territory after WWII (as US vassal nation). Back then, their Green party already recommended themselves for major future warmongering through then AuÃenminister Joschka Fischer.
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 7, 2026 - 8:47am |
|
kurtster wrote:
So what was Yugoslavia / Serbia about then ? NATO got involved there pretty intensely. IIRC they even took out all the electric power in Serbia. That was OK, but doing the same in Iran is a war crime ?
Oh so short memories.
Don't bother answering. It doesn't really matter what I think or pay attention to.
What's a little ethnic cleansing between business partners, right?
Your addled little mind can't wait to justify any bigoted atrocities.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 10:04pm |
|
buddy wrote:
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
thx for the reality check!
|
|
buddy

Location: Rocky Mountain Way Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 8:32pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
So what was Yugoslavia / Serbia about then ? NATO got involved there pretty intensely. IIRC they even took out all the electric power in Serbia. That was OK, but doing the same in Iran is a war crime ?
Oh so short memories.
Don't bother answering. It doesn't really matter what I think or pay attention to.
You can read. Pick up a history book. And I didnât say a thing about war crimes. Off the topic spin.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 8:07pm |
|
steeler wrote:
I am curious, Who is in this new coalition?
Not ignoring you. A valid question if you're not seeing or paying attention to what I am. Just not ready to start down a new rabbit hole right now.
Got work tomorrow and my monthly treatment on Wednesday that I am psyching myself up for. I'll get back to you later this week.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 7:53pm |
|
buddy wrote:
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
So what was Yugoslavia / Serbia about then ? NATO got involved there pretty intensely. IIRC they even took out all the electric power in Serbia. That was OK, but doing the same in Iran is a war crime ?
Oh so short memories.
Don't bother answering. It doesn't really matter what I think or pay attention to.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 6:52pm |
|
buddy wrote:
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
+1
|
|
buddy

Location: Rocky Mountain Way Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 5:30pm |
|
Before its declared that NATO doesnât work, perhaps the facts might matter.
The only time in NATO history that the collective defense clause was invoked was following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
Under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, an armed attack against one member is considered an attack against all. While NATO had engaged in several operations prior to 2001 (such as in the Balkans during the 1990s), those were based on UN mandates or "non-Article 5" crisis management rather than a formal declaration of collective defense.
Meanwhile back to the current reality, the US War on Iran is a war of Trumpâs choice, not a war due to an attack on the US. Article 5 does not apply.
Thank you NATO for coming to our aid after 9/11, and thanks for the sacrifice of your troops who gave their lives in the effort.
Oh yeah, and in the entire history of NATO, the USSR/Russia has never attacked a member nation.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 4:33pm |
|
Red_Dragon wrote:The Iranians don't need nukes anyway. (...)
There's a good chance that they have now changed their minds.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 4:22pm |
|
Steely_D wrote:
Well, it proves he felt unable to negotiate a better deal. It was true that it was going to expire in 2030, but a real deal maker could've stepped in and said, "I'll do even better than that other guy did; here are terms you'll accept and we'll both look like heroes."
But the senile felon rapist loser couldn't. So he played mobster/bully instead and now the world knows he's as impotent as his little mushroom dick.
The Iranians don't need nukes anyway. If they want to irradiate Israel all they have to do is fire enough of a missile/drone swarm at Dimona - something they are already capable of doing - to destroy it. Which they're unlikely to do, because Israel would incinerate them in return.
|
|
Steely_D

Location: At the dude ranch / above the sea Gender:  
|
|
Posted:
Apr 6, 2026 - 4:01pm |
|
VV wrote:
Yes, it was working. Just because Trump proclaimed without any justification that it was not⦠doesnât negate that fact.
Well, it proves he felt unable to negotiate a better deal. It was true that it was going to expire in 2030, but a real deal maker could've stepped in and said, "I'll do even better than that other guy did; here are terms you'll accept and we'll both look like heroes."
But the senile felon rapist loser couldn't. So he played mobster/bully instead and now the world knows he's as impotent as his little mushroom dick.
|
|
Warning: pg_close(): supplied resource is not a valid PostgreSQL link resource in /var/www/html/rp3.php on line 474
|